You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@rocketmq.apache.org by "yuz10 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/02/15 03:47:02 UTC
[GitHub] [rocketmq] yuz10 opened a new issue, #6071: Tiered storage on slave
yuz10 opened a new issue, #6071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6071
Hi, teams!
Currently the we have only local file tiered storage implementation, if we implement OSS/S3 tiered storage, the master and slave write to the same file on OSS/S3, I think only master should write to OSS/S3, Is there any design about this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Tiered storage on slave [rocketmq]
Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] closed issue #6071: Tiered storage on slave
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6071
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Tiered storage on slave [rocketmq]
Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #6071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6071#issuecomment-1953297567
This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 3 days since being marked as stale.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [rocketmq] RongtongJin commented on issue #6071: Tiered storage on slave
Posted by "RongtongJin (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
RongtongJin commented on issue #6071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6071#issuecomment-1432337507
> Tiered storage should be only enabled in the master. But the compatibility of tiered storage and HA needs more discussion, such as tiered storage should not upload data beyond the confirmed offset and how to quickly enable tiered storage when the slave broker promotes to master.
I think this can be considered. The new version of HA has the concept of confirm offset. In addition, we can complete enable tiered storage during role switching, just as we handle timing messages.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits commented on issue #6071: Tiered storage on slave
Posted by "ShadowySpirits (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
ShadowySpirits commented on issue #6071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6071#issuecomment-1430726611
Tiered storage should be only enabled in the master. But the compatibility of tiered storage and HA needs more discussion, such as tiered storage should not upload data beyond the confirmed offset and how to quickly enable tiered storage when the slave broker promotes to master.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org