DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39029] - Stax verifier JSR105 implementation

[bu...@apache.org]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029


raul-info@r-bg.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #18360|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Additional Comments From raul-info@r-bg.com  2006-12-15 08:20 -------
Created an attachment (id=19265)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19265&action=view)
A new patch with signature verification

Hi,
As work related to my master thesis, I have been working on this patch a
little. Now it can check if the signature was tampered, and it is much faster
and can handler any length documents (that is the main point of my master
thesis). I will publish the doc, and the powerpoint of it in my webpage. But
sadly it is written in Spanish. But anyway I think is useful as it contains
some graphics showing the memory consumption of the DOM library versus the STAX
library. 

If anybody wants to play with it have fun.

Changelog:
* Siganture & reference validation (the patch before only does reference
validation) 
* Size & Performance improvement: the patch can handle now arbitrary big
documents, and the performance is better. 

TODO:
* Inclusive C14n
* Enveloped signature verification.
* UTF16->UTF8 optimizations

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.