You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Deborah Schmidt <fr...@mpi-cbg.de> on 2019/02/28 10:37:23 UTC
Where to go with code depending on jackrabbit-webdav-3.0-SNAPSHOT
Hi all,
I wanted to use jackrabbit for our webdav client [1] and made a now
obviously bad decision and chose the 3.0-SNAPSHOT-version. It was easy
to use, the client seems to work fine, but I would like to fix the
situation and to depend on stable releases..
Now the implementation with 2.X seems to be quite different. Do you have
any tips for me how to resolve the situation? Should I have a look at Oak?
Thank you and regards,
Deborah
[1]
https://github.com/juglab/imagej-plugins-uploader-webdav/blob/fix-https-upload/src/main/java/net/imagej/plugins/uploaders/webdav/WebDAVUploader.java
Re: Where to go with code depending on jackrabbit-webdav-3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Deborah Schmidt <fr...@mpi-cbg.de>.
Thank you so much! 2.12.10 worked and now I also have an idea where to
search for the necessary code adjustments since I can follow the release
changes.
Best,
Deborah
On 28.02.19 14:01, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 28.02.2019 13:50, Deborah Schmidt wrote:
>> Thank you for answering!
>>
>> It's on our main imagej.net repository [1] and on
>> repository.apache.org [2] as well.
>>
>> Here [3] are some messages I found regarding the work on 3.0 which I
>> found in the mailing list archive.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://maven.imagej.net/content/groups/public/org/apache/jackrabbit/jackrabbit-webdav/3.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>> [2]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/jackrabbit/jackrabbit-webdav/3.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>> [3]
>> https://jackrabbit.markmail.org/search/?q=3.0-SNAPSHOT#query:3.0-SNAPSHOT+page:1+mid:6kkkdmyf6ni5pgte+state:results
>> ...
>
> Ah. SNAPSHOT.
>
> So it seems in 2014 (when work on Oak started) we were indeed
> temporarily using a 3.* number for Jackrabbit, but we did not make
> releases.
>
> Given that, you probably should be able to use a later stable release
> which predates the switch to the new HttpClient - for instance 2.12.10.
>
> That said, sooner or later you should upgrade to a later Jackrabbit
> release, because the old HttpClient is out of maintenance and has
> known security issues. (see
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2406> and related tickets)
>
> Best regards, Julian
Re: Where to go with code depending on jackrabbit-webdav-3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 28.02.2019 13:50, Deborah Schmidt wrote:
> Thank you for answering!
>
> It's on our main imagej.net repository [1] and on repository.apache.org
> [2] as well.
>
> Here [3] are some messages I found regarding the work on 3.0 which I
> found in the mailing list archive.
>
> [1]
> http://maven.imagej.net/content/groups/public/org/apache/jackrabbit/jackrabbit-webdav/3.0-SNAPSHOT/
>
> [2]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/jackrabbit/jackrabbit-webdav/3.0-SNAPSHOT/
>
> [3]
> https://jackrabbit.markmail.org/search/?q=3.0-SNAPSHOT#query:3.0-SNAPSHOT+page:1+mid:6kkkdmyf6ni5pgte+state:results
> ...
Ah. SNAPSHOT.
So it seems in 2014 (when work on Oak started) we were indeed
temporarily using a 3.* number for Jackrabbit, but we did not make releases.
Given that, you probably should be able to use a later stable release
which predates the switch to the new HttpClient - for instance 2.12.10.
That said, sooner or later you should upgrade to a later Jackrabbit
release, because the old HttpClient is out of maintenance and has known
security issues. (see <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2406>
and related tickets)
Best regards, Julian
Re: Where to go with code depending on jackrabbit-webdav-3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Deborah Schmidt <fr...@mpi-cbg.de>.
Thank you for answering!
It's on our main imagej.net repository [1] and on repository.apache.org
[2] as well.
Here [3] are some messages I found regarding the work on 3.0 which I
found in the mailing list archive.
[1]
http://maven.imagej.net/content/groups/public/org/apache/jackrabbit/jackrabbit-webdav/3.0-SNAPSHOT/
[2]
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/jackrabbit/jackrabbit-webdav/3.0-SNAPSHOT/
[3]
https://jackrabbit.markmail.org/search/?q=3.0-SNAPSHOT#query:3.0-SNAPSHOT+page:1+mid:6kkkdmyf6ni5pgte+state:results
On 28.02.19 12:06, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 28.02.2019 11:37, Deborah Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wanted to use jackrabbit for our webdav client [1] and made a now
>> obviously bad decision and chose the 3.0-SNAPSHOT-version. It was
>> easy to use, the client seems to work fine, but I would like to fix
>> the situation and to depend on stable releases..
>>
>> Now the implementation with 2.X seems to be quite different. Do you
>> have any tips for me how to resolve the situation? Should I have a
>> look at Oak?
>>
>> Thank you and regards,
>>
>> Deborah
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/juglab/imagej-plugins-uploader-webdav/blob/fix-https-upload/src/main/java/net/imagej/plugins/uploaders/webdav/WebDAVUploader.java
>
>
> I don't know anything about a 3.0.* version. Where did you get it from?
>
> Best regards, Julian
Re: Where to go with code depending on jackrabbit-webdav-3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 28.02.2019 11:37, Deborah Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to use jackrabbit for our webdav client [1] and made a now
> obviously bad decision and chose the 3.0-SNAPSHOT-version. It was easy
> to use, the client seems to work fine, but I would like to fix the
> situation and to depend on stable releases..
>
> Now the implementation with 2.X seems to be quite different. Do you have
> any tips for me how to resolve the situation? Should I have a look at Oak?
>
> Thank you and regards,
>
> Deborah
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/juglab/imagej-plugins-uploader-webdav/blob/fix-https-upload/src/main/java/net/imagej/plugins/uploaders/webdav/WebDAVUploader.java
I don't know anything about a 3.0.* version. Where did you get it from?
Best regards, Julian