You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> on 2010/06/28 02:51:47 UTC
"Old" vs "new" area tree/IF
Hi
I'm looking at using the area tree to transform some output, but am
concerned that it seems to be being replaced with a new format in svn
trunk. The new format doesn't contain some of the information I need,
like what elements are in what columns within a region-body.
If I use the old format, will it be sticking around, or is it likely to
get dropped at some point?
--
Craig Ringer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: "Old" vs "new" area tree/IF
Posted by Pascal Sancho <pa...@takoma.fr>.
Hi Craig,
With the Fop trunk version, you can produce either the new IF file (the
default), or the old AT file. The IF page [1] should give you further
information.
[1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/intermediate.html
--
Pascal
Le 28/06/2010 02:51, Craig Ringer a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I'm looking at using the area tree to transform some output, but am
> concerned that it seems to be being replaced with a new format in svn
> trunk. The new format doesn't contain some of the information I need,
> like what elements are in what columns within a region-body.
>
> If I use the old format, will it be sticking around, or is it likely to
> get dropped at some point?
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org