You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu> on 2007/11/06 18:06:14 UTC
S2: input by method for validations
I need to define a custom input for method in the same action.
For example, I have the "methodA" that receive the information from
inputA.jsp
I have "methodB" that receive from inputB.jsp
I use the validation for each one:
classAction_methodA-validation.xml
classAction_methodB-validation.xml
The problem occurs when the validations fails(some input field is
wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this case are two inputs in
the same Action but in different methods... In some way to say to the
action the default input.
Something like:
<result name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
<result name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
<result name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result> (Other method by default
use the input)
But he validations understands to which input goes.
Manuel Correa.
RE: S2: input by method for validations
Posted by Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu>.
Break in different classes is not the idea, in that way we need a class for each method or action. The solution is:
<result name="input">{1}.jsp</result>
In that way the method has the same name of the jsp, and the input is variable!! Works fine!
Manuel Correa.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Affonso [mailto:glists2@greywether.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:58 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
Maybe this is obvious, but why not just break this into two different
action classes? Then you get easy control of where you map the "INPUT"
result code generated when the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor detects a
validation error.
- Gary
Manuel Correa wrote:
> I found this:
> <interceptor-ref name="workflow">
> <param name="inputResultName" >inputA</param>
> </interceptor-ref>
>
> That is the way that you can change the default input.
> My question is:
>
> I using wildcards for instance the methods... I can do this:
>
> <interceptor-ref name="workflow">
> <param name="inputResultName" >input_{1}</param> (This doesn't work)
> </interceptor-ref>
>
> I need to find a way to define dynamically the input depends of the method that is call.!!
> Thanks
>
> Manuel Correa.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Newton [mailto:newton.dave@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:00 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: S2: input by method for validations
>
> You *might* be able to use an OGNL property to
> configure the name of the input result as an
> interceptor param; I don't know if they support
> parsing, though.
>
> d.
>
> --- Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu> wrote:
>
>> The validations works fine. Sorry about the mistake.
>> The problem is the result: The input. When something
>> is wrong with the fields..by default the validation
>> stack forward to the INPUT, I need to define depends
>> of the method which is the input.
>>
>> Manuel Correa.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: F�tima Silveira [mailto:fawixfa@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:20 PM
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
>>
>> the name of the XML must be like
>>
>> ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
>>
>> so you must rename your xml to
>>
>> Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>>
>> Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>>
>>
>> On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu>
>> wrote:
>>> I need to define a custom input for method in the
>> same action.
>>>
>>>
>>> For example, I have the "methodA" that receive
>> the information from
>>> inputA.jsp
>>>
>>> I have "methodB" that receive from inputB.jsp
>>>
>>> I use the validation for each one:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>>>
>>> classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem occurs when the validations
>> fails(some input field is
>>> wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this
>> case are two inputs in
>>> the same Action but in different methods... In
>> some way to say to the
>>> action the default input.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> <result name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <result name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <result name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result>
>> (Other method by default
>>> use the input)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But he validations understands to which input
>> goes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Manuel Correa.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> user-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: S2: input by method for validations
Posted by Gary Affonso <gl...@greywether.com>.
Maybe this is obvious, but why not just break this into two different
action classes? Then you get easy control of where you map the "INPUT"
result code generated when the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor detects a
validation error.
- Gary
Manuel Correa wrote:
> I found this:
> <interceptor-ref name="workflow">
> <param name="inputResultName" >inputA</param>
> </interceptor-ref>
>
> That is the way that you can change the default input.
> My question is:
>
> I using wildcards for instance the methods... I can do this:
>
> <interceptor-ref name="workflow">
> <param name="inputResultName" >input_{1}</param> (This doesn't work)
> </interceptor-ref>
>
> I need to find a way to define dynamically the input depends of the method that is call.!!
> Thanks
>
> Manuel Correa.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Newton [mailto:newton.dave@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:00 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: S2: input by method for validations
>
> You *might* be able to use an OGNL property to
> configure the name of the input result as an
> interceptor param; I don't know if they support
> parsing, though.
>
> d.
>
> --- Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu> wrote:
>
>> The validations works fine. Sorry about the mistake.
>> The problem is the result: The input. When something
>> is wrong with the fields..by default the validation
>> stack forward to the INPUT, I need to define depends
>> of the method which is the input.
>>
>> Manuel Correa.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: F�tima Silveira [mailto:fawixfa@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:20 PM
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
>>
>> the name of the XML must be like
>>
>> ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
>>
>> so you must rename your xml to
>>
>> Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>>
>> Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>>
>>
>> On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu>
>> wrote:
>>> I need to define a custom input for method in the
>> same action.
>>>
>>>
>>> For example, I have the "methodA" that receive
>> the information from
>>> inputA.jsp
>>>
>>> I have "methodB" that receive from inputB.jsp
>>>
>>> I use the validation for each one:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>>>
>>> classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem occurs when the validations
>> fails(some input field is
>>> wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this
>> case are two inputs in
>>> the same Action but in different methods... In
>> some way to say to the
>>> action the default input.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> <result name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <result name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <result name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result>
>> (Other method by default
>>> use the input)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But he validations understands to which input
>> goes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Manuel Correa.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> user-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
RE: S2: input by method for validations
Posted by Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu>.
I found this:
<interceptor-ref name="workflow">
<param name="inputResultName" >inputA</param>
</interceptor-ref>
That is the way that you can change the default input.
My question is:
I using wildcards for instance the methods... I can do this:
<interceptor-ref name="workflow">
<param name="inputResultName" >input_{1}</param> (This doesn't work)
</interceptor-ref>
I need to find a way to define dynamically the input depends of the method that is call.!!
Thanks
Manuel Correa.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Newton [mailto:newton.dave@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:00 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: S2: input by method for validations
You *might* be able to use an OGNL property to
configure the name of the input result as an
interceptor param; I don't know if they support
parsing, though.
d.
--- Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu> wrote:
> The validations works fine. Sorry about the mistake.
> The problem is the result: The input. When something
> is wrong with the fields..by default the validation
> stack forward to the INPUT, I need to define depends
> of the method which is the input.
>
> Manuel Correa.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: F�tima Silveira [mailto:fawixfa@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:20 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
>
> the name of the XML must be like
>
> ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
>
> so you must rename your xml to
>
> Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>
> Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>
>
> On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > I need to define a custom input for method in the
> same action.
> >
> >
> >
> > For example, I have the "methodA" that receive
> the information from
> > inputA.jsp
> >
> > I have "methodB" that receive from inputB.jsp
> >
> > I use the validation for each one:
> >
> >
> >
> > classAction_methodA-validation.xml
> >
> > classAction_methodB-validation.xml
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem occurs when the validations
> fails(some input field is
> > wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this
> case are two inputs in
> > the same Action but in different methods... In
> some way to say to the
> > action the default input.
> >
> >
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > <result name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result>
> (Other method by default
> > use the input)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But he validations understands to which input
> goes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Manuel Correa.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
RE: S2: input by method for validations
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
You *might* be able to use an OGNL property to
configure the name of the input result as an
interceptor param; I don't know if they support
parsing, though.
d.
--- Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu> wrote:
> The validations works fine. Sorry about the mistake.
> The problem is the result: The input. When something
> is wrong with the fields..by default the validation
> stack forward to the INPUT, I need to define depends
> of the method which is the input.
>
> Manuel Correa.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: F�tima Silveira [mailto:fawixfa@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:20 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
>
> the name of the XML must be like
>
> ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
>
> so you must rename your xml to
>
> Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>
> Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>
>
> On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > I need to define a custom input for method in the
> same action.
> >
> >
> >
> > For example, I have the "methodA" that receive
> the information from
> > inputA.jsp
> >
> > I have "methodB" that receive from inputB.jsp
> >
> > I use the validation for each one:
> >
> >
> >
> > classAction_methodA-validation.xml
> >
> > classAction_methodB-validation.xml
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem occurs when the validations
> fails(some input field is
> > wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this
> case are two inputs in
> > the same Action but in different methods... In
> some way to say to the
> > action the default input.
> >
> >
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > <result name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result>
> (Other method by default
> > use the input)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But he validations understands to which input
> goes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Manuel Correa.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
RE: S2: input by method for validations
Posted by Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu>.
The validations works fine. Sorry about the mistake. The problem is the result: The input. When something is wrong with the fields..by default the validation stack forward to the INPUT, I need to define depends of the method which is the input.
Manuel Correa.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fátima Silveira [mailto:fawixfa@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:20 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
the name of the XML must be like
ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
so you must rename your xml to
Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu> wrote:
>
> I need to define a custom input for method in the same action.
>
>
>
> For example, I have the "methodA" that receive the information from
> inputA.jsp
>
> I have "methodB" that receive from inputB.jsp
>
> I use the validation for each one:
>
>
>
> classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>
> classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>
>
>
> The problem occurs when the validations fails(some input field is
> wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this case are two inputs in
> the same Action but in different methods... In some way to say to the
> action the default input.
>
>
>
> Something like:
>
> <result name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
>
>
>
> <result name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
>
>
>
> <result name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result> (Other method by default
> use the input)
>
>
>
>
>
> But he validations understands to which input goes.
>
>
>
> Manuel Correa.
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: S2: input by method for validations
Posted by Fátima Silveira <fa...@gmail.com>.
the name of the XML must be like
ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
so you must rename your xml to
Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mc...@itos.uga.edu> wrote:
>
> I need to define a custom input for method in the same action.
>
>
>
> For example, I have the "methodA" that receive the information from
> inputA.jsp
>
> I have "methodB" that receive from inputB.jsp
>
> I use the validation for each one:
>
>
>
> classAction_methodA-validation.xml
>
> classAction_methodB-validation.xml
>
>
>
> The problem occurs when the validations fails(some input field is
> wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this case are two inputs in
> the same Action but in different methods... In some way to say to the
> action the default input.
>
>
>
> Something like:
>
> <result name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
>
>
>
> <result name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
>
>
>
> <result name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result> (Other method by default
> use the input)
>
>
>
>
>
> But he validations understands to which input goes.
>
>
>
> Manuel Correa.
>
>
>
>