You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com> on 2007/03/22 16:21:55 UTC

Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors

Hi, all!

I'd like to announce the contribution of JMX implementation and JMX
optional remote connectors implementation on behalf of Intel
Corporation.

They could be found at:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3473 (JMX)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3474 (connectors).

I think it would be helpful to use some solutions of this contribution
for improving MX4J and creating state-of-the-art JMX implementation for
Harmony.

I welcome you to try the contribution and share your opinions.

Thanks,

Vasily Zakharov
Intel ESSD

Re: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors

Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:

>
>> Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based implementation, or
> enhance it?
>
> To enhance, of course. Why replace a good thing?

:)

>
>  Vasily
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:25 AM
> To: dev@harmony.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi, all!
>>
>> I'd like to announce the contribution of JMX implementation and JMX
>> optional remote connectors implementation on behalf of Intel
>> Corporation.
>>
>> They could be found at:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3473 (JMX)
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3474 (connectors).
>>
>> I think it would be helpful to use some solutions of this  
>> contribution
>> for improving MX4J and creating state-of-the-art JMX implementation
>> for
>> Harmony.
>
> I don't understand.  Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based
> implementation, or enhance it?
>
>>
>> I welcome you to try the contribution and share your opinions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Vasily Zakharov
>> Intel ESSD

RE: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors

Posted by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com>.
> Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based implementation, or
enhance it?

To enhance, of course. Why replace a good thing?

 Vasily


-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:25 AM
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors


On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:

> Hi, all!
>
> I'd like to announce the contribution of JMX implementation and JMX
> optional remote connectors implementation on behalf of Intel
> Corporation.
>
> They could be found at:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3473 (JMX)
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3474 (connectors).
>
> I think it would be helpful to use some solutions of this contribution
> for improving MX4J and creating state-of-the-art JMX implementation  
> for
> Harmony.

I don't understand.  Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based  
implementation, or enhance it?

>
> I welcome you to try the contribution and share your opinions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD

Re: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors

Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:

> Hi, all!
>
> I'd like to announce the contribution of JMX implementation and JMX
> optional remote connectors implementation on behalf of Intel
> Corporation.
>
> They could be found at:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3473 (JMX)
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3474 (connectors).
>
> I think it would be helpful to use some solutions of this contribution
> for improving MX4J and creating state-of-the-art JMX implementation  
> for
> Harmony.

I don't understand.  Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based  
implementation, or enhance it?

>
> I welcome you to try the contribution and share your opinions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD