You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Henry Saputra <hs...@apache.org> on 2012/02/07 21:41:11 UTC

Review Request: SHINDIG-1701 Change the action_container.js rpc registration to call the Container.rpcRegister instead directly call gadgets.rpc.register

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and Dan Dumont.


Summary
-------

See jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701


This addresses bug SHINDIG-1701.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701


Diffs
-----

  trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js 1241570 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/diff


Testing
-------

Run mvn clean install and sanity test with conservcontainer


Thanks,

Henry


Re: Review Request: SHINDIG-1701 Change the action_container.js rpc registration to call the Container.rpcRegister instead directly call gadgets.rpc.register

Posted by Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/#review4892
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


LGTM

- Ryan


On 2012-02-07 22:41:01, Henry Saputra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-02-07 22:41:01)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and Dan Dumont.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> See jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SHINDIG-1701.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js 1241570 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Run mvn clean install and sanity test with conservcontainer
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Henry
> 
>


Re: Review Request: SHINDIG-1701 Change the action_container.js rpc registration to call the Container.rpcRegister instead directly call gadgets.rpc.register

Posted by Henry Saputra <hs...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/#review4893
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks, committed as rev 1241749

- Henry


On 2012-02-07 22:41:01, Henry Saputra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-02-07 22:41:01)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and Dan Dumont.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> See jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SHINDIG-1701.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js 1241570 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Run mvn clean install and sanity test with conservcontainer
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Henry
> 
>


Re: Review Request: SHINDIG-1701 Change the action_container.js rpc registration to call the Container.rpcRegister instead directly call gadgets.rpc.register

Posted by Henry Saputra <hs...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated 2012-02-07 22:41:01.934131)


Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and Dan Dumont.


Changes
-------

Upload new diff based on Ryan review


Summary
-------

See jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701


This addresses bug SHINDIG-1701.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701


Diffs (updated)
-----

  trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js 1241570 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/diff


Testing
-------

Run mvn clean install and sanity test with conservcontainer


Thanks,

Henry


Re: Review Request: SHINDIG-1701 Change the action_container.js rpc registration to call the Container.rpcRegister instead directly call gadgets.rpc.register

Posted by Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/#review4879
-----------------------------------------------------------



trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/#comment10753>

    Instead of having these new wrapper functions I would prefer if we could make them inline functions passed to rpcRegister


- Ryan


On 2012-02-07 20:41:11, Henry Saputra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-02-07 20:41:11)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and Dan Dumont.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> See jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SHINDIG-1701.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1701
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/actions/actions_container.js 1241570 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3777/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Run mvn clean install and sanity test with conservcontainer
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Henry
> 
>