You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Twice <tw...@apache.org> on 2026/08/18 13:46:31 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
This vote has now passed with 5 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding votes.
+1 binding:
Xuanwo
tison
hulk
Alin Jerpelea
Twice
+1 non-binding:
mingcheng
Lok Andy
Best,
Twice
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:42 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ahh also with my own +1. 😝
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:34 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you all! I'll announce the result soon.
> >
> > Best,
> > Twice
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:15 PM Alin Jerpelea <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Alin J
> > >
> > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, 03:54 hulk, <hu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <or...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <xu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote:
> > > > > > > My +1 binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its name", which
> > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is done. Given
> > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users pinning
> > > > it,
> > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep publishing
> > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something else... and
> > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would reach out
> > > > to
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new asyncband
> > > > crate.
> > > > > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite straightforward. I
> > > > don't
> > > > > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead working on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > concrete migration work.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to asyncband 0.6.7
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > > they are logically identical.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; should
> > > > be
> > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You may find it
> > > > is
> > > > > > "The
> > > > > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at
> > > > https://docs.rs/asyncband"
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > the proposal now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies because it
> > > > > > shows
> > > > > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband has been
> > > > under
> > > > > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate representation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual form is
> > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Updated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background says "four
> > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and Core
> > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers tell one
> > > > > > >> story.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example. Answer
> > > > has
> > > > > > 111
> > > > > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now includes 18
> > > > > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these numbers
> > > > should
> > > > > > > be aligned? It is a common community status.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5 contributors
> > > > make
> > > > > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git history, but
> > > > he
> > > > > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I count on him
> > > > for
> > > > > > > several significant decisions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > tison.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > mingcheng <mi...@apache.org> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming concern, so
> > > > I'm
> > > > > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing during or right
> > > > > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the crate has been
> > > > > > >> downloaded more than 5M times.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its name", which
> > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is done. Given
> > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users pinning
> > > > it,
> > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep publishing
> > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something else... and
> > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea; should
> > > > be
> > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual form is
> > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background says "four
> > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and Core
> > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers tell one
> > > > > > >> story.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > >> mingcheng
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <tw...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Following the discussion thread
> > > > > > >> > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs),
> > > > I
> > > > > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the Apache
> > > > Incubator.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Please cast your vote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
> > > > > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care
> > > > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator,
> > > > because ...
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and only votes
> > > > from
> > > > > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from everyone are
> > > > > > >> > welcome.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks!
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Best wishes,
> > > > > > >> > Twice
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Xuanwo
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://xuanwo.io/
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > - Hulk Lin
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
Posted by Twice <tw...@apache.org>.
Sorry. I'm not sure why but these emails don't appear in my inbox.
I've confirmed this with lists.apache.org.
I'll resend the vote result.
Best,
Twice
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:52 PM tison <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ... and Sheng Wu's +1 binding.
>
> You can resend an email with the corrected result.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> tison <wa...@gmail.com> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:50写道：
>
> > A minor comment, you miss to count Orthur Black <or...@gmail.com>'s +1
> > non-binding.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Twice <tw...@apache.org> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:46写道：
> >
> >> This vote has now passed with 5 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding
> >> votes.
> >>
> >> +1 binding:
> >> Xuanwo
> >> tison
> >> hulk
> >> Alin Jerpelea
> >> Twice
> >>
> >> +1 non-binding:
> >> mingcheng
> >> Lok Andy
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Twice
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:42 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ahh also with my own +1. 😝
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:34 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you all! I'll announce the result soon.
> >> > >
> >> > > Best,
> >> > > Twice
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:15 PM Alin Jerpelea <je...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +1 binding
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Best regards
> >> > > > Alin J
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, 03:54 hulk, <hu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > +1 binding
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <or...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <xu...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > +1 binding
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > My +1 binding
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
> >> name", which
> >> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
> >> done. Given
> >> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
> >> pinning
> >> > > > > it,
> >> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
> >> publishing
> >> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
> >> else... and
> >> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would
> >> reach out
> >> > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > all
> >> > > > > > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new
> >> asyncband
> >> > > > > crate.
> >> > > > > > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite
> >> straightforward. I
> >> > > > > don't
> >> > > > > > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead
> >> working on
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > concrete migration work.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to
> >> asyncband 0.6.7
> >> > > > > > > since
> >> > > > > > > > they are logically identical.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
> >> should
> >> > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You
> >> may find it
> >> > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > "The
> >> > > > > > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at
> >> > > > > https://docs.rs/asyncband"
> >> > > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > > > the proposal now.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies
> >> because it
> >> > > > > > > shows
> >> > > > > > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband
> >> has been
> >> > > > > under
> >> > > > > > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate
> >> representation.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
> >> form is
> >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Updated.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
> >> says "four
> >> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9",
> >> and Core
> >> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the
> >> numbers tell one
> >> > > > > > > >> story.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example.
> >> Answer
> >> > > > > has
> >> > > > > > > 111
> >> > > > > > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now
> >> includes 18
> >> > > > > > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these
> >> numbers
> >> > > > > should
> >> > > > > > > > be aligned? It is a common community status.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > [2]
> >> https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5
> >> contributors
> >> > > > > make
> >> > > > > > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git
> >> history, but
> >> > > > > he
> >> > > > > > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I
> >> count on him
> >> > > > > for
> >> > > > > > > > several significant decisions.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > > > > tison.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > mingcheng <mi...@apache.org> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道：
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming
> >> concern, so
> >> > > > > I'm
> >> > > > > > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing
> >> during or right
> >> > > > > > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking:
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the
> >> crate has been
> >> > > > > > > >> downloaded more than 5M times.
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
> >> name", which
> >> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
> >> done. Given
> >> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
> >> pinning
> >> > > > > it,
> >> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
> >> publishing
> >> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
> >> else... and
> >> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
> >> should
> >> > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> >> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
> >> form is
> >> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
> >> says "four
> >> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9",
> >> and Core
> >> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the
> >> numbers tell one
> >> > > > > > > >> story.
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> Best,
> >> > > > > > > >> mingcheng
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <tw...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > Following the discussion thread
> >> > > > > > > >> > (
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs),
> >> > > > > I
> >> > > > > > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the
> >> Apache
> >> > > > > Incubator.
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here:
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > Please cast your vote:
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
> >> > > > > > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care
> >> > > > > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache
> >> Incubator,
> >> > > > > because ...
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and
> >> only votes
> >> > > > > from
> >> > > > > > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from
> >> everyone are
> >> > > > > > > >> > welcome.
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks!
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > Best wishes,
> >> > > > > > > >> > Twice
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> > > > > general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > Xuanwo
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > https://xuanwo.io/
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Best Regards,
> >> > > > > - Hulk Lin
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
... and Sheng Wu's +1 binding.
You can resend an email with the corrected result.
Best,
tison.
tison <wa...@gmail.com> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:50写道：
> A minor comment, you miss to count Orthur Black <or...@gmail.com>'s +1
> non-binding.
>
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Twice <tw...@apache.org> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:46写道：
>
>> This vote has now passed with 5 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding
>> votes.
>>
>> +1 binding:
>> Xuanwo
>> tison
>> hulk
>> Alin Jerpelea
>> Twice
>>
>> +1 non-binding:
>> mingcheng
>> Lok Andy
>>
>> Best,
>> Twice
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:42 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ahh also with my own +1. 😝
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:34 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Thank you all! I'll announce the result soon.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Twice
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:15 PM Alin Jerpelea <je...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 binding
>> > > >
>> > > > Best regards
>> > > > Alin J
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, 03:54 hulk, <hu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 binding
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <or...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <xu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1 binding
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote:
>> > > > > > > > My +1 binding
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
>> name", which
>> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
>> done. Given
>> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
>> pinning
>> > > > > it,
>> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
>> publishing
>> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
>> else... and
>> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would
>> reach out
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > > > all
>> > > > > > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new
>> asyncband
>> > > > > crate.
>> > > > > > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite
>> straightforward. I
>> > > > > don't
>> > > > > > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead
>> working on
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > concrete migration work.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to
>> asyncband 0.6.7
>> > > > > > > since
>> > > > > > > > they are logically identical.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
>> should
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You
>> may find it
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > "The
>> > > > > > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at
>> > > > > https://docs.rs/asyncband"
>> > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > the proposal now.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies
>> because it
>> > > > > > > shows
>> > > > > > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband
>> has been
>> > > > > under
>> > > > > > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate
>> representation.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
>> form is
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Updated.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
>> says "four
>> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9",
>> and Core
>> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the
>> numbers tell one
>> > > > > > > >> story.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example.
>> Answer
>> > > > > has
>> > > > > > > 111
>> > > > > > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now
>> includes 18
>> > > > > > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these
>> numbers
>> > > > > should
>> > > > > > > > be aligned? It is a common community status.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [2]
>> https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5
>> contributors
>> > > > > make
>> > > > > > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git
>> history, but
>> > > > > he
>> > > > > > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I
>> count on him
>> > > > > for
>> > > > > > > > several significant decisions.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > tison.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > mingcheng <mi...@apache.org> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道：
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming
>> concern, so
>> > > > > I'm
>> > > > > > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing
>> during or right
>> > > > > > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the
>> crate has been
>> > > > > > > >> downloaded more than 5M times.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
>> name", which
>> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
>> done. Given
>> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
>> pinning
>> > > > > it,
>> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
>> publishing
>> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
>> else... and
>> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
>> should
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
>> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
>> form is
>> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
>> says "four
>> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9",
>> and Core
>> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the
>> numbers tell one
>> > > > > > > >> story.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Best,
>> > > > > > > >> mingcheng
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <tw...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Hi everyone,
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Following the discussion thread
>> > > > > > > >> > (
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs),
>> > > > > I
>> > > > > > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the
>> Apache
>> > > > > Incubator.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Please cast your vote:
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
>> > > > > > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care
>> > > > > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache
>> Incubator,
>> > > > > because ...
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and
>> only votes
>> > > > > from
>> > > > > > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from
>> everyone are
>> > > > > > > >> > welcome.
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Best wishes,
>> > > > > > > >> > Twice
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> > > > > general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Xuanwo
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://xuanwo.io/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Best Regards,
>> > > > > - Hulk Lin
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
Posted by tison <wa...@gmail.com>.
A minor comment, you miss to count Orthur Black <or...@gmail.com>'s +1
non-binding.
Best,
tison.
Twice <tw...@apache.org> 于2026年8月18日周二 21:46写道：
> This vote has now passed with 5 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding
> votes.
>
> +1 binding:
> Xuanwo
> tison
> hulk
> Alin Jerpelea
> Twice
>
> +1 non-binding:
> mingcheng
> Lok Andy
>
> Best,
> Twice
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:42 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ahh also with my own +1. 😝
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 9:34 PM Twice <tw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you all! I'll announce the result soon.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Twice
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 2:15 PM Alin Jerpelea <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Alin J
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, 03:54 hulk, <hu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 00:31, Orthur Black <or...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:45 AM Xuanwo <xu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, at 22:41, tison wrote:
> > > > > > > > My +1 binding
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
> name", which
> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
> done. Given
> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
> pinning
> > > > > it,
> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
> publishing
> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
> else... and
> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The rebrand has been done at [1]. The proposed PPMC would
> reach out
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > downstream projects and help them to migrate to the new
> asyncband
> > > > > crate.
> > > > > > > > The plan has been answered here and it's quite
> straightforward. I
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > think we should spend time on writing it down but instead
> working on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > concrete migration work.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You may help in opendal's migration from mea 0.6.7 to
> asyncband 0.6.7
> > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > they are logically identical.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/fast/asyncband/pull/149
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
> should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Where do you find a pointer to https://docs.rs/mea? You may
> find it
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > "The
> > > > > > > > API documentation of Asyncband is hosted at
> > > > > https://docs.rs/asyncband"
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the proposal now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I kept https://crates.io/crates/mea/reverse_dependencies
> because it
> > > > > > > shows
> > > > > > > > the current downstream status. The migration to asyncband
> has been
> > > > > under
> > > > > > > > processed. This should be the proper intermediate
> representation.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
> form is
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Updated.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
> says "four
> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and
> Core
> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers
> tell one
> > > > > > > >> story.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Take Apache Answer you serve as a PMC member as an example.
> Answer
> > > > > has
> > > > > > > 111
> > > > > > > > contributors on the GitHub contributor graph [2] and now
> includes 18
> > > > > > > > committers and a PMC of 14 members. Why do you think these
> numbers
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > be aligned? It is a common community status.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [2]
> https://github.com/apache/answer/graphs/contributors?all=1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you really want a concrete explanation: The other 5
> contributors
> > > > > make
> > > > > > > > 1~2 commits randomly. Andy has one commit from the Git
> history, but
> > > > > he
> > > > > > > > spent adequate time in design discussion and review. I count
> on him
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > several significant decisions.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > tison.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > mingcheng <mi...@apache.org> 于2026年8月14日周五 22:11写道：
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The project is well discussed and addressed the naming
> concern, so
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > >> in favour of accepting it. A few things worth fixing during
> or right
> > > > > > > >> after the vote which none of them were blocking:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Right now, we have four active contributors and the crate
> has been
> > > > > > > >> downloaded more than 5M times.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> First, Initial Source said "The crate will retain its
> name", which
> > > > > > > >> reads ambiguously now that the rebrand to `asyncband` is
> done. Given
> > > > > > > >> that `mea` has 5M+ downloads and existing downstream users
> pinning
> > > > > it,
> > > > > > > >> it would help to write down the plan: deprecate it, keep
> publishing
> > > > > > > >> pointer releases to the new crate, yank it, or something
> else... and
> > > > > > > >> who ends up owning that name.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Second, Documentation still points at https://docs.rs/mea;
> should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > >> https://docs.rs/asyncband, and community also links to
> > > > > > > >> https://crates.io/crates/asyncband/reverse_dependencies.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Third, Git Repositories has the gitbox URL as
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/asf/repos/asyncband , the usual
> form is
> > > > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/asyncband.git
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Lastly, contributor counts don't line up: The background
> says "four
> > > > > > > >> active contributors", Community says "Contributors: 9", and
> Core
> > > > > > > >> Developers names four people. Worth aligning so the numbers
> tell one
> > > > > > > >> story.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > > >> mingcheng
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:16 PM Twice <tw...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Following the discussion thread
> > > > > > > >> > (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/f31qd3jm3odomjwy3lqkk21coyqsr9xs),
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > >> > call for a formal vote to accept Asyncband into the Apache
> > > > > Incubator.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > As a reminder, the Asyncband proposal is here:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/INCUBATOR/pages/446071349/Asyncband+Proposal
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Please cast your vote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > [ ] +1, Accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator
> > > > > > > >> > [ ] 0, I don't care
> > > > > > > >> > [ ] -1, Do not accept Asyncband into the Apache Incubator,
> > > > > because ...
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, and only
> votes
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > >> > the Incubator PMC members are binding. Votes from
> everyone are
> > > > > > > >> > welcome.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Best wishes,
> > > > > > > >> > Twice
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Xuanwo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://xuanwo.io/
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > - Hulk Lin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>