You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> on 2022/06/14 16:26:19 UTC
[VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've caught
so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes implementing
how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and logs in a
common open specification called OpenTelemetry (opentelemetry.io). The
proposal was based on the several POC's that were conducted to test the
feasibility of the specification.
Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better
'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways
to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the
core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
Howard
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Pankaj Singh <aa...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:15 PM Leah Cole <co...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:19 PM Drew Hubl <dr...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Mateusz Henc <mh...@google.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding) Looking forward to seeing it in Airflow
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:15 PM Ryan Hamilton <
>> ryan.hamilton@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:13 AM Josh Fell <
>>> josh.d.fell@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding) Nice!
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:08 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> + 1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar <
>>>>> phani.kumar@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding), let's do it !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov <
>>>>>> ikholopov@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <
>>>>>>> turbaszek@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see
>>>>>>>>> more and more need from users who want it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks
>>>>>>>>>> I've caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with
>>>>>>>>>> OpenTelemetry Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00
>>>>>>>>>> UTC.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>>>>>>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>>>>>>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>>>>>>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's
>>>>>>>>>> that were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become
>>>>>>>>>> better 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better
>>>>>>>>>> ways to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use
>>>>>>>>>> cases.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational
>>>>>>>>>> to the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Howard
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Leah Cole (she/her) | Developer Programs Engineer, Data Analytics |
> coleleah@google.com | +1 (925) 257-2112
> *My working hours may not be your working hours. Please ping me anytime if
> you'd like a status update on anything we are working on together - my goal
> is to never be a blocker for you. *
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Pankaj Singh
Senior Software Engineer, Freshworks
Connect on LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/aa3pankaj/>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Leah Cole <co...@google.com.INVALID>.
+1 non-binding
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:19 PM Drew Hubl <dr...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Jun 15, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Mateusz Henc <mh...@google.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding) Looking forward to seeing it in Airflow
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:15 PM Ryan Hamilton <
> ryan.hamilton@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:13 AM Josh Fell <
>> josh.d.fell@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding) Nice!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:08 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> + 1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar <
>>>> phani.kumar@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding), let's do it !
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov <
>>>>> ikholopov@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <
>>>>>> turbaszek@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see
>>>>>>>> more and more need from users who want it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks
>>>>>>>>> I've caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with
>>>>>>>>> OpenTelemetry Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00
>>>>>>>>> UTC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>>>>>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>>>>>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>>>>>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's
>>>>>>>>> that were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become
>>>>>>>>> better 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better
>>>>>>>>> ways to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use
>>>>>>>>> cases.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational
>>>>>>>>> to the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Howard
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>
--
Leah Cole (she/her) | Developer Programs Engineer, Data Analytics |
coleleah@google.com | +1 (925) 257-2112
*My working hours may not be your working hours. Please ping me anytime if
you'd like a status update on anything we are working on together - my goal
is to never be a blocker for you. *
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Drew Hubl <dr...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding)
> On Jun 15, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Mateusz Henc <mh...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding) Looking forward to seeing it in Airflow
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:15 PM Ryan Hamilton <ry...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:13 AM Josh Fell <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (binding) Nice!
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:08 AM Elad Kalif <eladkal@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> + 1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), let's do it !
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov <ik...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <turbaszek@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com <ma...@potiuk.com>> wrote:
> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more and more need from users who want it.
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <howardyoo@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow>
>
> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
>
> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (opentelemetry.io <http://opentelemetry.io/>). The proposal was based on the several POC's that were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>
> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
>
> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>
> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>
> Howard
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Mateusz Henc <mh...@google.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding) Looking forward to seeing it in Airflow
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:15 PM Ryan Hamilton
<ry...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:13 AM Josh Fell
> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding) Nice!
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:08 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> + 1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar
>>> <ph...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding), let's do it !
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov
>>>> <ik...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see
>>>>>>> more and more need from users who want it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've
>>>>>>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
>>>>>>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00
>>>>>>>> UTC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>>>>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>>>>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>>>>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's
>>>>>>>> that were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become
>>>>>>>> better 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better
>>>>>>>> ways to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use
>>>>>>>> cases.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to
>>>>>>>> the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Howard
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Ryan Hamilton <ry...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:13 AM Josh Fell
<jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (binding) Nice!
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:08 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> + 1 (binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar
>> <ph...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding), let's do it !
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov
>>> <ik...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more
>>>>>> and more need from users who want it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've
>>>>>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
>>>>>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00
>>>>>>> UTC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>>>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>>>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>>>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's that
>>>>>>> were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become
>>>>>>> better 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better
>>>>>>> ways to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use
>>>>>>> cases.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to
>>>>>>> the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Howard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Josh Fell <jo...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 (binding) Nice!
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:08 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> + 1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar
> <ph...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding), let's do it !
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov
>> <ik...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more
>>>>> and more need from users who want it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've
>>>>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
>>>>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's that
>>>>>> were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better
>>>>>> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways
>>>>>> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to
>>>>>> the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Howard
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>.
+ 1 (binding)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar
<ph...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), let's do it !
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov <ik...@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more
>>>> and more need from users who want it.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've
>>>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
>>>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
>>>>>
>>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's that
>>>>> were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better
>>>>> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways
>>>>> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
>>>>>
>>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to
>>>>> the core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>>>
>>>>> Howard
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding), let's do it !
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov <ik...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more
>>> and more need from users who want it.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've
>>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
>>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>>
>>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
>>>>
>>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's that
>>>> were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>>
>>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better
>>>> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways
>>>> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
>>>>
>>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the
>>>> core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>>
>>>> Howard
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Igor Kholopov <ik...@google.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding), let's make it happen!
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more and
>> more need from users who want it.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've
>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>>
>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
>>>
>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes
>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and
>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry (
>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's that
>>> were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification.
>>>
>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better
>>> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways
>>> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
>>>
>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the
>>> core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>>
>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>>
>>> Howard
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more and
> more need from users who want it.
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've
>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>>
>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
>>
>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes implementing
>> how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and logs in a
>> common open specification called OpenTelemetry (opentelemetry.io). The
>> proposal was based on the several POC's that were conducted to test the
>> feasibility of the specification.
>>
>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better
>> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways
>> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
>>
>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the
>> core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>>
>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>>
>> Howard
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more and
more need from users who want it.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've caught
> so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry
> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
>
> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC.
>
> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes implementing
> how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and logs in a
> common open specification called OpenTelemetry (opentelemetry.io). The
> proposal was based on the several POC's that were conducted to test the
> feasibility of the specification.
>
> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better
> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways
> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases.
>
> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the
> core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :).
>
> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible,
>
> Howard
>