You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2014/04/02 08:58:52 UTC
[Bug 7031] New: spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
Bug ID: 7031
Summary: spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.4.0
Hardware: PC
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: spamc/spamd
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Reporter: igor@newnn.ru
Hello
Users complain that sent emails cut an attached file. The investigation
revealed that they cut passing through Spamassassin.
logviewer showed that the program produces an error spamc
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/smtpd[20328]: connect from
mail.exch01.*****.ru[192.168.208.16]
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/smtpd[20328]: 903302C9114:
client=mail.exch01.*****.ru[192.168.208.16]
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/cleanup[20157]: 903302C9114:
message-id=<30...@EXCH01.skfnn.local>
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/qmgr[82598]: 903302C9114: from=<tsm@*****.ru>,
size=1285941, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/smtpd[20328]: disconnect from
mail.exch01.*****.ru[192.168.208.16]
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail spamc[20341]: skipped message, greater than max message
size (512000 bytes)
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/pickup[20106]: BD7752C9117: uid=107
from=<tsm@*****.ru>
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/cleanup[20157]: BD7752C9117:
message-id=<30...@EXCH01.skfnn.local>
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/qmgr[82598]: BD7752C9117: from=<tsm@*****.ru>,
size=2415, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail clamsmtpd: 104C78: accepted connection from: 127.0.0.1
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/smtpd[20337]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail spamc[20342]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned different
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail last message repeated 91 times
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail spamc[20342]: oops! message_dump of 3711 returned different
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/pipe[19876]: 903302C9114:
to=<ig...@gmail.com>, relay=spam, delay=0.23, delays=0.13/0/0/0.09,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via spam service)
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/pipe[19876]: 903302C9114: to=<igor@*****.ru>,
relay=spam, delay=0.23, delays=0.13/0/0/0.09, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered
via spam service)
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail postfix/qmgr[82598]: 903302C9114: removed
mail# uname -a
FreeBSD mail.*****.ru 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r263103: Thu Mar 13
09:07:10 MSK 2014 iv*****@mail.*****.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mail.conf i386
Apr 1 14:10:29 mail postfix/master[22853]: daemon started -- version 2.11.0,
configuration /usr/local/etc/postfix
mail# spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0
running on Perl version 5.18.2
mail# zcat /var/log/maillog.0.bz2 | grep oops
Apr 1 01:42:18 mail spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 01:42:18 mail spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 1885 returned
different
Apr 1 03:10:28 mail spamc[13799]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 03:10:28 mail spamc[13799]: oops! message_dump of 6517 returned
different
Apr 1 10:57:32 mail spamc[19421]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 10:57:32 mail spamc[19421]: oops! message_dump of 7465 returned
different
Apr 1 11:36:09 mail spamc[20073]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 11:36:09 mail spamc[20073]: oops! message_dump of 3510 returned
different
Apr 1 11:40:23 mail spamc[20132]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 11:40:23 mail spamc[20132]: oops! message_dump of 3492 returned
different
Apr 1 11:46:01 mail spamc[20249]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 11:46:01 mail spamc[20249]: oops! message_dump of 3634 returned
different
Apr 1 11:48:33 mail spamc[20287]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 11:48:33 mail spamc[20287]: oops! message_dump of 3588 returned
different
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail spamc[20342]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Apr 1 11:50:17 mail spamc[20342]: oops! message_dump of 3711 returned
different
Apr 1 21:29:56 mail spamc[5539]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned different
Apr 1 21:29:56 mail spamc[5539]: oops! message_dump of 7094 returned different
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
(In reply to Igor from comment #13)
> (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #12)
> >
> > Sorry, the wording is a little confusing (though much better than I would be
> > able to write in your native language).
> >
> > I think you are saying you resolved this and it was not a spamassassin issue?
>
> Sorry for my bad English. :-)
> The problem is solved.
> I changed the settings master.cf
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |igor@newnn.ru
--- Comment #2 from Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #1)
> Not sure where to start on this one. From looking at the code, it's a very
> basic function of spamc.
>
> We'll need samples of emails before and after that show the issue.
>
> Also more information at least for me on how your mail flow works. My
> curiosity is something like ClamAV triggering that the email is a virus and
> interrupting things.
master.cf
....
# ${nexthop} ${user}
# AV scan filter (used by content_filter)
scan unix - - n - 16 smtp
-o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
-o smtp_enforce_tls=no
# For injecting mail back into postfix from the filter
127.0.0.1:10026 inet n - n - 16 smtpd
-o content_filter=
-o receive_override_options=no_unknown_recipient_checks,no_header_body_checks
-o smtpd_helo_restrictions=
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=
-o smtpd_sender_restrictions=
-o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject
-o mynetworks_style=host
-o smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts=127.0.0.0/8
# Check spam
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spam:dummy
spam unix - n n - - pipe
flags=R user=virtual argv=/usr/local/bin/spamc -u virtual -e
/usr/sbin/sendmail -f $sender $recipient
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #3 from Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #1)
>
> Also more information at least for me on how your mail flow works. My
> curiosity is something like ClamAV triggering that the email is a virus and
> interrupting things.
Received: from mxfront2o.mail.yandex.net ([127.0.0.1])
by mxfront2o.mail.yandex.net with LMTP id 4JMClRYp
for <ju...@newnn.ru>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:04:19 +0400
Received: from mail.zaoskf.ru (mail.zaoskf.ru [195.122.241.242])
by mxfront2o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id
NFQnT8NmWD-4IYe8AFs;
Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:04:18 +0400
X-Yandex-Front: mxfront2o.mail.yandex.net
X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1396454658
X-Yandex-Uniq: 4893684f-eaca-4be1-8ff3-c979876969b0
Authentication-Results: mxfront2o.mail.yandex.net; spf=softfail
(mxfront2o.mail.yandex.net: transitioning domain of zaoskf.ru does not
designate 195.122.241.242 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mapotehina@zaoskf.ru
X-Yandex-Spam: 1
Received: from mail.zaoskf.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.zaoskf.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D92A2C9060
for <ju...@newnn.ru>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:04:18 +0400 (MSK)
Received: by mail.zaoskf.ru (Postfix, from userid 107)
id 45F4B2C905F; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:04:18 +0400 (MSK)
Received: from EXCH01.skfnn.local (mail.exch01.zaoskf.ru [192.168.208.16])
by mail.zaoskf.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D2F2C9012
for <ju...@newnn.ru>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:04:18 +0400 (MSK)
Received: from EXCH01.skfnn.local ([::1]) by EXCH01.skfnn.local ([::1]) with
mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:04:17 +0400
From: =?koi8-r?B?8M/UxcjJzsEg7cHSydEg4czFy9PFxdfOwQ==?= <ma...@zaoskf.ru>
To: "julia@newnn.ru" <ju...@newnn.ru>
Subject:
=?koi8-r?B?Rlc6IPPPx8zB08/Xwc7OwdEg8/og0M8gxMXH1dPUwcPJySDXIMHQ0sXMxSAy?=
=?koi8-r?Q?014=C7.?=
Thread-Topic:
=?koi8-r?B?88/HzMHTz9fBzs7B0SDz+iDQzyDExcfV09TBw8nJINcgwdDSxczFIDIwMTTH?=
=?koi8-r?Q?.?=
Thread-Index: Ac9OTqVWbKkDh6IvTtKEaoonR9xAywAPofVA
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:04:17 +0000
Message-ID: <16...@EXCH01.skfnn.local>
References: <9B...@EXCH01.skfnn.local>
In-Reply-To: <9B...@EXCH01.skfnn.local>
Accept-Language: ru-RU, en-US
Content-Language: ru-RU
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.208.200]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_004_163A1556EAF109488DDEF76E785287B004601BE8EXCH01skfnnloca_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Scanned
Return-Path: mapotehina@zaoskf.ru
X-Yandex-Forward: f8ec758dd2a4e2c5d914dd408a8a9e7b
--_004_163A1556EAF109488DDEF76E785287B004601BE8EXCH01skfnnloca_
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_163A1556EAF109488DDEF76E785287B004601BE8EXCH01skfnnloca_"
--_000_163A1556EAF109488DDEF76E785287B004601BE8EXCH01skfnnloca_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=F3 =F5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD,
=E7=CF=CC=CF=D7=C9=CE=CF=D7 =E9=C7=CF=D2=D8 =F7=CC=C1=C4=C9=CD=C9=D2=CF=D7=
=C9=DE
=D3=C9=D3=D4=C5=CD=CE=D9=CA =C1=C4=CD=C9=CE=C9=D3=D4=D2=C1=D4=CF=D2
=C7. =EE=C9=D6=CE=C9=CA =EE=CF=D7=C7=CF=D2=CF=C4, =FA=E1=EF "=F3=CF=D2=CD=
=CF=D7=D3=CB=C1=D1 =CB=CF=CE=C4=C9=D4=C5=D2=D3=CB=C1=D1 =C6=C1=C2=D2=C9=CB=
=C1"
(831) 225-58-75, +7-910-137-80-94
From: =F0=CF=D4=C5=C8=C9=CE=C1 =ED=C1=D2=C9=D1 =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C5=C5=D7=CE=
=C1
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 12:37 PM
To: =E1=D2=C8=C1=D2=CF=D7 =F7=CC=C1=C4=C9=CD=C9=D2 =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C5=C5=D7=
=C9=DE; =F4=CF=CC=D8=D3=CB=C9=CA =E5=D7=C7=C5=CE=C9=CA; =EB=D2=C9=D7=CF=D2=
=CF=D4=CF=D7 =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2 (a.krivorotov21@gmail.com); =EC=D9=
=D3=A3=D7 =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2 (las_58@mail.ru); =ED=C1=D2=C3=C5=CE=
=C0=CB =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2; =F3=CF=CE=CF=D7 =EB=CF=CE=D3=D4=C1=CE=
=D4=C9=CE; =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C5=CA =FB=C9=D4=CF=D7; =E1=D4=C1=D0=C9=CE=C1 =E1=
=CE=D4=CF=CE=C9=CE=C1(=E9=EF =F3=C1=D2=C1=D4=CF=D7); =F2=D5=C2=C1=CE=C9=D3=
=D4=C1=D1 =E9=CC=D8=CD=C9=D2=C1; =F3=D5=C4=C1=D2=C9=CB=CF=D7 =E1=CC=C5=CB=
=D3=C5=CA =E7=C5=CE=CE=C1=C4=D8=C5=D7=C9=DE; =FE=D5=D2=D3=C9=CE =E1=CC=C5=
=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2; =E2=C5=D2=C5=DA=C9=CE=C1 =F6=C5=CE=D1 (=CE=CF=D7); =FB=
=C5=D7=DE=C5=CE=CB=CF=D7=C1 =E1=CE=C1=D3=D4=C1=D3=C9=D1 =F7=CC=C1=C4=C9=CD=
=C9=D2=CF=D7=CE=C1; =F3=C1=CB=D3=CF=CE=CF=D7=C1 =F4=C1=D4=D8=D1=CE=C1; =E9=
=D2=C9=CE=C1 =EB=D5=DA=CE=C5=C3=CF=D7=C1; =E1=C7=C1=C6=CF=CE=CF=D7=C1 =E0=
=CC=D1; =EE=C9=CB=D5=CC=D8=CE=C9=CB=CF=D7=C1 =F4=C1=D4=D8=D1=CE=C1; =F6=C9=
=C7=C1=DE=C5=D7=C1 =E5=CB=C1=D4=C5=D2=C9=CE=C1; =FA=C1=CB=C9=D2=CF=D7=C1 =
=E7=D5=DA=C5=CC=D8; =E0=CC=D1 =EE=C9=CB=C9=D4=C9=CE=C1; =F4=CF=CC=CF=D7=C1 =
=E5=D7=C7=C5=CE=C9=D1; =F4=D2=D5=C2=C9=C3=D9=CE=C1 =E5=CC=C9=DA=C1=D7=C5=D4=
=C1 (trubitsina@dik.udm.ru); =EC=CF=C7=C9=CE=CF=D7=C1 =E5=CC=C5=CE=C1; =E5=
=D7=C4=CF=CB=C9=CD=CF=D7=C1 =ED=C1=D2=C9=D1
Subject: =F3=CF=C7=CC=C1=D3=CF=D7=C1=CE=CE=C1=D1 =F3=FA =D0=CF =C4=C5=C7=D5=
=D3=D4=C1=C3=C9=C9 =D7 =C1=D0=D2=C5=CC=C5 2014=C7.
=E4=CF=C2=D2=D9=CA =C4=C5=CE=D8!
=F7=CF =D7=CC=CF=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5 =D3=CF=C7=CC=C1=D3=CF=D7=C1=CE=CE=C1=D1 =F3=
=FA =D0=CF =C4=C5=C7=D5=D3=D4=C1=C3=C9=C9 =CE=C1 =C1=D0=D2=C5=CC=D8 2014=C7=
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #13 from Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #12)
>
> Sorry, the wording is a little confusing (though much better than I would be
> able to write in your native language).
>
> I think you are saying you resolved this and it was not a spamassassin issue?
Sorry for my bad English. :-)
The problem is solved.
I changed the settings master.cf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #9 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
I'm not saying it isn't a spamc bug but you need an email and you need to run
it with spamc on the command line to replicate the issue outside of postfix.
Can you do anything like mirror all your mail prior to postfix for a day and
then cross reference to the oops in the log to get an unaltered email?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jhardin@impsec.org
--- Comment #8 from John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #6)
> Have you tried posting about this in a postfix forum?
> Perhaps someone there can assist you in saving the email for analysis.
If the un-truncated message is in the postfix queue it can be exported for
analysis to an rfc-822-format text file using postcat. See
http://www.postfix.org/postcat.1.html
Use -bh for headers and body, envelope metadata should not be needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
This is the truncated email, correct? Will it reproduce the issue if
reinjected into your mailstream?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #5 from Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #4)
> This is the truncated email, correct? Will it reproduce the issue if
> reinjected into your mailstream?
Yes Kevin, the problem with truncation as to give mail to me and from me.
What's weird, is not cut all the letters
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@pccc.com
--- Comment #1 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
Not sure where to start on this one. From looking at the code, it's a very
basic function of spamc.
We'll need samples of emails before and after that show the issue.
Also more information at least for me on how your mail flow works. My
curiosity is something like ClamAV triggering that the email is a virus and
interrupting things.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #6 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
(In reply to Igor from comment #5)
> (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #4)
> > This is the truncated email, correct? Will it reproduce the issue if
> > reinjected into your mailstream?
>
> Yes Kevin, the problem with truncation as to give mail to me and from me.
> What's weird, is not cut all the letters
Have you tried posting about this in a postfix forum? I will say this is
unlikely to be SA and more likely something in your setup.
Perhaps someone there can assist you in saving the email for analysis. Without
a pre-injection email the replicates the issue with JUST spamc/spamd from the
command line, there is very little we can do to help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #12 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
(In reply to Igor from comment #11)
> (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #9)
> > I'm not saying it isn't a spamc bug but you need an email and you need to
> > run it with spamc on the command line to replicate the issue outside of
> > postfix.
> >
> > Can you do anything like mirror all your mail prior to postfix for a day and
> > then cross reference to the oops in the log to get an unaltered email?
>
> Play with the postfix I came to the conclusion that SA has become normal to
> miss the mail.
>
> master.cf
> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
> < flags=R user=virtual argv=/usr/local/bin/spamc -u virtual -e
> /usr/sbin/sendmail -f $sender $recipient
> > user=virtual argv=/usr/local/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
>
> And it's workerd :-) Strange.
Sorry, the wording is a little confusing (though much better than I would be
able to write in your native language).
I think you are saying you resolved this and it was not a spamassassin issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #11 from Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #9)
> I'm not saying it isn't a spamc bug but you need an email and you need to
> run it with spamc on the command line to replicate the issue outside of
> postfix.
>
> Can you do anything like mirror all your mail prior to postfix for a day and
> then cross reference to the oops in the log to get an unaltered email?
Play with the postfix I came to the conclusion that SA has become normal to
miss the mail.
master.cf
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
< flags=R user=virtual argv=/usr/local/bin/spamc -u virtual -e
/usr/sbin/sendmail -f $sender $recipient
> user=virtual argv=/usr/local/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
And it's workerd :-) Strange.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #10 from Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #9)
> I'm not saying it isn't a spamc bug but you need an email and you need to
> run it with spamc on the command line to replicate the issue outside of
> postfix.
>
> Can you do anything like mirror all your mail prior to postfix for a day and
> then cross reference to the oops in the log to get an unaltered email?
All right. Tomorrow night will gather for all mail in one file. And what
command to feed his spam assassin?
I think the problem for ten years, as shown by google
:-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7031] spamc[12692]: oops! message_dump of 8192 returned
different
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
--- Comment #7 from Igor <ig...@newnn.ru> ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #6)
>
> Perhaps someone there can assist you in saving the email for analysis.
> Without a pre-injection email the replicates the issue with JUST spamc/spamd
> from the command line, there is very little we can do to help.
Tried on different forums. All cite that this is a bug spamc and sent here. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.