You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/04/06 19:35:25 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33926] - [configuration] The Iterator returned by getKeys() should support remove()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33926>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33926


oliver.heger@t-online.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From oliver.heger@t-online.de  2005-04-06 19:35 -------
I will try to implement the wrapper iterator approach. Because
AbstractConfiguration.getKeys() will then contain some logic, this requires a
new abstract method in AbstractConfiguration, say createIterator(). getKeys()
will delegate to this method and then create the wrapper iterator around the
obtained iterator. The getKeys() method in derived classes will have to be
renamed to createIterator().

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org