You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ambari.apache.org by "Vitaly Brodetskyi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/26 15:39:19 UTC
[jira] [Created] (AMBARI-4843) Ambari DDL for MySQL should not
create ambarirca database
Vitaly Brodetskyi created AMBARI-4843:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: Ambari DDL for MySQL should not create ambarirca database
Key: AMBARI-4843
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-4843
Project: Ambari
Issue Type: Bug
Components: agent
Reporter: Vitaly Brodetskyi
Assignee: Vitaly Brodetskyi
Priority: Critical
Attachments: AMBARI-4843.patch
Ambari-DDL-MySQL-CREATE.sql includes "create ambarirca" database.
{code}
CREATE DATABASE ambarirca;
USE ambarirca;
{code}
1) At minimum, this DDL should not be creating an ambarirca database and instead mix in the RCA tables with core Ambari tables (that's how Oracle DDL does it -- I think). Not ideal but better than creating an ambarirca database in this script (a user would be surprised to see this).
2) Alternatively, we need to split out RCA DDL from the core Ambari. We can doc that if you plan to use HDP 1.3.x stack that you need to to setup an RCA database (since RCA is only applicable to those with HDP 1.3.x stack). If we go this route, for consistency, we would need to do the same for the oracle DDL.
Note: Right now, looks like the oracle DDL just puts the RCA tables in the same database as ambari core tables (basically #1 above).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)