You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/05/14 12:20:55 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28977] New: - ProxyOutpoutStream: no need to define proxy

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977

ProxyOutpoutStream: no need to define proxy

           Summary: ProxyOutpoutStream: no need to define proxy
           Product: Commons
           Version: 1.0 Final
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: IO
        AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: lbe.tech@spree.de


- Why don't you use the out-member of the java.io.FilterOutputStream class?
- perhaps a getProxy() and setProxy() would be nice to leave the reference to
the ProxyOutputStream constant but change the underlying output stream -
currently with the private proxy-member this is not possible

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org