You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@onami.apache.org by "Mikhail Mazursky (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/03/30 09:45:23 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-88) Consistent policy for exception handling

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13618021#comment-13618021 ] 

Mikhail Mazursky commented on ONAMI-88:
---------------------------------------

I experimented a bit with catching RuntimeException and wrapping it in ProvisionException vs just letting exception propagate. I used existing code in UUIDConverter as a testcase. So, the current behaviour (catch&wrap) results in this output (i obused a test in other project for experiments - don't take it into account):

com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:

1) String value 'abcasd' is not a valid UUID
  while locating java.util.UUID annotated with @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
    for field at org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
  while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase

1 error
	at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
	[...]
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
	at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
	[...]

If we don't catch - this is the output:

com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:

1) Error converting 'abcasd' (bound at org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase$1.configure(URLConverterTestCase.java:54)) to java.util.UUID
 using java.util.UUID which matches only(java.util.UUID) (bound at org.apache.onami.converters.core.AbstractConverter.configure(AbstractConverter.java:44)).
 Reason: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
  while locating java.util.UUID annotated with @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
    for field at org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
  while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase

1 error
	at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
	[...]
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
	at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
	[...]

As you can see, wrapping in ProvisionException gives us less information - apparently Guice treats ProvisionException somehow not like other exceptions. I propose to get rid of wrapping in ProvisionException and wrap only checked exceptions in RuntimeException where necessary. WDYT?
                
> Consistent policy for exception handling
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ONAMI-88
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88
>             Project: Apache Onami
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: configuration
>    Affects Versions: configuration-6.3.0
>            Reporter: Mikhail Mazursky
>            Priority: Minor
>
> No consistent policy for exception handling - for example SQLTimestampConverter catches Throwable and rethrows it as ProvisionException but CharsetConverter do not catch anything at all. Should we catch at all or Guice handles this itself?
> I guess we should rethrow only checked exceptions. Also no need to catch Errors in such places in any case (catch Exception vs Throwable).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-88) Consistent policy for exception handling

Posted by Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>.
Like I thought I didn't got the exact point.

Thx for clarification. I'm totally with you. (but I still don't like the guide exceptions - it is hard to write a highly customisable application around it)
On Mar 30, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Mikhail Mazursky <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> advantages are Guice shows:
> - where the offending constant was bound;
> - to what type it tried to convert it (not necessary the type that is
> required - can be subtype);
> - where the converter was bound.
> 
> I think this can be helpfull information :)
> 
> 2013/3/30 Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I don't see any advantage from 2. But I'm not familiar with the test case
>> maybe I just don't get the point of the information which is not delivered
>> with 1 but in 2.
>> Could you explain it a little bit more? :)
>> 
>> 
>> Thx,
>> Daniel
>> 
>> On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Mikhail Mazursky (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>>   [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13618021#comment-13618021]
>>> 
>>> Mikhail Mazursky commented on ONAMI-88:
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> I experimented a bit with catching RuntimeException and wrapping it in
>> ProvisionException vs just letting exception propagate. I used existing
>> code in UUIDConverter as a testcase. So, the current behaviour (catch&wrap)
>> results in this output (i obused a test in other project for experiments -
>> don't take it into account):
>>> 
>>> com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:
>>> 
>>> 1) String value 'abcasd' is not a valid UUID
>>> while locating java.util.UUID annotated with
>> @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
>>>   for field at
>> org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
>>> while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase
>>> 
>>> 1 error
>>>      at
>> com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
>>>      [...]
>>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string:
>> abcasd
>>>      at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
>>>      [...]
>>> 
>>> If we don't catch - this is the output:
>>> 
>>> com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:
>>> 
>>> 1) Error converting 'abcasd' (bound at
>> org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase$1.configure(URLConverterTestCase.java:54))
>> to java.util.UUID
>>> using java.util.UUID which matches only(java.util.UUID) (bound at
>> org.apache.onami.converters.core.AbstractConverter.configure(AbstractConverter.java:44)).
>>> Reason: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
>>> while locating java.util.UUID annotated with
>> @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
>>>   for field at
>> org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
>>> while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase
>>> 
>>> 1 error
>>>      at
>> com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
>>>      [...]
>>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string:
>> abcasd
>>>      at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
>>>      [...]
>>> 
>>> As you can see, wrapping in ProvisionException gives us less information
>> - apparently Guice treats ProvisionException somehow not like other
>> exceptions. I propose to get rid of wrapping in ProvisionException and wrap
>> only checked exceptions in RuntimeException where necessary. WDYT?
>>> 
>>>> Consistent policy for exception handling
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>>               Key: ONAMI-88
>>>>               URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88
>>>>           Project: Apache Onami
>>>>        Issue Type: Improvement
>>>>        Components: configuration
>>>>  Affects Versions: configuration-6.3.0
>>>>          Reporter: Mikhail Mazursky
>>>>          Priority: Minor
>>>> 
>>>> No consistent policy for exception handling - for example
>> SQLTimestampConverter catches Throwable and rethrows it as
>> ProvisionException but CharsetConverter do not catch anything at all.
>> Should we catch at all or Guice handles this itself?
>>>> I guess we should rethrow only checked exceptions. Also no need to
>> catch Errors in such places in any case (catch Exception vs Throwable).
>>> 
>>> --
>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> administrators
>>> For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>> 
>> 


Re: [jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-88) Consistent policy for exception handling

Posted by Mikhail Mazursky <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

advantages are Guice shows:
- where the offending constant was bound;
- to what type it tried to convert it (not necessary the type that is
required - can be subtype);
- where the converter was bound.

I think this can be helpfull information :)

2013/3/30 Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>

> Hi,
>
> I don't see any advantage from 2. But I'm not familiar with the test case
> maybe I just don't get the point of the information which is not delivered
> with 1 but in 2.
> Could you explain it a little bit more? :)
>
>
> Thx,
> Daniel
>
> On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Mikhail Mazursky (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13618021#comment-13618021]
> >
> > Mikhail Mazursky commented on ONAMI-88:
> > ---------------------------------------
> >
> > I experimented a bit with catching RuntimeException and wrapping it in
> ProvisionException vs just letting exception propagate. I used existing
> code in UUIDConverter as a testcase. So, the current behaviour (catch&wrap)
> results in this output (i obused a test in other project for experiments -
> don't take it into account):
> >
> > com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:
> >
> > 1) String value 'abcasd' is not a valid UUID
> >  while locating java.util.UUID annotated with
> @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
> >    for field at
> org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
> >  while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase
> >
> > 1 error
> >       at
> com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
> >       [...]
> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string:
> abcasd
> >       at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
> >       [...]
> >
> > If we don't catch - this is the output:
> >
> > com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:
> >
> > 1) Error converting 'abcasd' (bound at
> org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase$1.configure(URLConverterTestCase.java:54))
> to java.util.UUID
> > using java.util.UUID which matches only(java.util.UUID) (bound at
> org.apache.onami.converters.core.AbstractConverter.configure(AbstractConverter.java:44)).
> > Reason: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
> >  while locating java.util.UUID annotated with
> @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
> >    for field at
> org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
> >  while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase
> >
> > 1 error
> >       at
> com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
> >       [...]
> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string:
> abcasd
> >       at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
> >       [...]
> >
> > As you can see, wrapping in ProvisionException gives us less information
> - apparently Guice treats ProvisionException somehow not like other
> exceptions. I propose to get rid of wrapping in ProvisionException and wrap
> only checked exceptions in RuntimeException where necessary. WDYT?
> >
> >> Consistent policy for exception handling
> >> ----------------------------------------
> >>
> >>                Key: ONAMI-88
> >>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88
> >>            Project: Apache Onami
> >>         Issue Type: Improvement
> >>         Components: configuration
> >>   Affects Versions: configuration-6.3.0
> >>           Reporter: Mikhail Mazursky
> >>           Priority: Minor
> >>
> >> No consistent policy for exception handling - for example
> SQLTimestampConverter catches Throwable and rethrows it as
> ProvisionException but CharsetConverter do not catch anything at all.
> Should we catch at all or Guice handles this itself?
> >> I guess we should rethrow only checked exceptions. Also no need to
> catch Errors in such places in any case (catch Exception vs Throwable).
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators
> > For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>

Re: [jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-88) Consistent policy for exception handling

Posted by Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,

I don't see any advantage from 2. But I'm not familiar with the test case maybe I just don't get the point of the information which is not delivered with 1 but in 2.
Could you explain it a little bit more? :)


Thx,
Daniel

On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Mikhail Mazursky (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:

> 
>    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13618021#comment-13618021 ] 
> 
> Mikhail Mazursky commented on ONAMI-88:
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> I experimented a bit with catching RuntimeException and wrapping it in ProvisionException vs just letting exception propagate. I used existing code in UUIDConverter as a testcase. So, the current behaviour (catch&wrap) results in this output (i obused a test in other project for experiments - don't take it into account):
> 
> com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:
> 
> 1) String value 'abcasd' is not a valid UUID
>  while locating java.util.UUID annotated with @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
>    for field at org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
>  while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase
> 
> 1 error
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
> 	[...]
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
> 	at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
> 	[...]
> 
> If we don't catch - this is the output:
> 
> com.google.inject.ConfigurationException: Guice configuration errors:
> 
> 1) Error converting 'abcasd' (bound at org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase$1.configure(URLConverterTestCase.java:54)) to java.util.UUID
> using java.util.UUID which matches only(java.util.UUID) (bound at org.apache.onami.converters.core.AbstractConverter.configure(AbstractConverter.java:44)).
> Reason: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
>  while locating java.util.UUID annotated with @com.google.inject.name.Named(value=a)
>    for field at org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase.u(URLConverterTestCase.java:43)
>  while locating org.apache.onami.converters.net.URLConverterTestCase
> 
> 1 error
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.getProvider(InjectorImpl.java:1004)
> 	[...]
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid UUID string: abcasd
> 	at java.util.UUID.fromString(UUID.java:194)
> 	[...]
> 
> As you can see, wrapping in ProvisionException gives us less information - apparently Guice treats ProvisionException somehow not like other exceptions. I propose to get rid of wrapping in ProvisionException and wrap only checked exceptions in RuntimeException where necessary. WDYT?
> 
>> Consistent policy for exception handling
>> ----------------------------------------
>> 
>>                Key: ONAMI-88
>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-88
>>            Project: Apache Onami
>>         Issue Type: Improvement
>>         Components: configuration
>>   Affects Versions: configuration-6.3.0
>>           Reporter: Mikhail Mazursky
>>           Priority: Minor
>> 
>> No consistent policy for exception handling - for example SQLTimestampConverter catches Throwable and rethrows it as ProvisionException but CharsetConverter do not catch anything at all. Should we catch at all or Guice handles this itself?
>> I guess we should rethrow only checked exceptions. Also no need to catch Errors in such places in any case (catch Exception vs Throwable).
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira