You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Olga Smola <ol...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/20 17:26:02 UTC

UI tickets: Review request

Hi,

Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:

http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
ticket last comment
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already discussed
with Jessica.

Thanks,
Olga

Re: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Olga Smola <ol...@gmail.com>.
Pranav,

thanks, done.

Olga

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>wrote:

> Hi Olga,****
>
> ** **
>
> You could upload your updated patch on the review board tool (
> https://reviews.apache.org) , which you have been doing earlier also .
> Brian/Jessica would carry it forward from there. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks & Regards,****
>
> Pranav****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:59 PM
> *To:* Pranav Saxena; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
> *Subject:* Fwd: UI tickets: Review request****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Olga Smola* <ol...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:27 AM
> Subject: Re: UI tickets: Review request
> To: Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>
>
>
> Pranav,
>
> you are right, I'll remove "async: false" from the list operation right
> now and update patch from the ticket.
>
> Thanks,
> Olga****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi olga, ****
>
>  ****
>
> I got the point you are trying to make. I thought that the
> “listOSCategories” command did not exist before and we just had
>  “listOsTypes “ command to work with. ****
>
>  ****
>
> $.ajax({****
>
>             url: createURL("*listOsTypes*"),****
>
>             dataType: "json"****
>
>  ****
>
> $.ajax({                                      ****
>
>             url: createURL("*listOsCategories*") – This has been created by you.****
>
>  ****
>
> This looks perfectly ok . I apologize for the inconvenience caused.****
>
>  ****
>
> Question - Any reasons for setting the “*async*” variable to “False”
> under the OStype ID category because as far as I know we keep “async” to
> true for all the list operations ? Please correct me in case I am missing
> out on something here.****
>
> /*****
>
> $.ajax({****
>
>                                                      url: createURL(apiCmd),****
>
>                                                      dataType: "json",****
>
>                                                      *async: false,* //true****
>
>                                                      success: function(json****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> */****
>
> @Brian – I have tested this functionality on my set up and it’s working
> fine .You might want to review it once as well before you could merge it
> with the apache branch.****
>
>  ****
>
> Regards,****
>
> Pranav****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:05 PM
> *To:* Brian Federle
> *Cc:* Pranav Saxena; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jessica Wang
> *Subject:* Re: UI tickets: Review request****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi Pranav,
>
> Excuse me, I can't understand what you mean from here "...however since
> the backend API command hasn't been implemented for listing the specific OS
> types". Could you please clarify which API should be implemented? Because
> I've used already exists API commands "listOsCategories" and "listOsTypes".
> For "listOsTypes" I use param "oscategoryid" to get only OsTypes from
> specific Category.
>
> Best regards,
> Olga****
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>
> wrote:****
>
> That is a good idea too, I agree.
>
> Also keep in mind that it will require a fair bit of UI testing too, since
> this would affect numerous dialog boxes and forms throughout the UI.
>
> -Brian****
>
>
> On 6/25/12 1:04 PM, "Pranav Saxena" <pr...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Olga ,
> >
> >I reviewed your code for the following bug which you raised -
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292 . This looks like a more
> >modular improvement in displaying the OS types as split categories. Your
> >patch looks good however since the backend API command hasn't been
> >implemented for listing the specific OS types , you'll have to probably
> >wait a bit for this patch of yours to be merged ( Where you have written
> >"api command" explicitly in your patch ).
> >
> >The idea definitely looks good to me.
> >
> >@Brian/Jessica - what are your suggestions for the same ?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Pranav
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:56 PM
> >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: UI tickets: Review request
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
> >
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
> >ticket last comment
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
> >latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
> >Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
> >correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already
> >discussed with Jessica.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Olga****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>

RE: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>.
Hi Olga,

You could upload your updated patch on the review board tool (https://reviews.apache.org) , which you have been doing earlier also . Brian/Jessica would carry it forward from there.

Thanks & Regards,
Pranav

From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:59 PM
To: Pranav Saxena; Brian Federle; Jessica Wang
Subject: Fwd: UI tickets: Review request


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Olga Smola <ol...@gmail.com>>
Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: UI tickets: Review request
To: Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>>


Pranav,

you are right, I'll remove "async: false" from the list operation right now and update patch from the ticket.

Thanks,
Olga

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi olga,

I got the point you are trying to make. I thought that the "listOSCategories" command did not exist before and we just had  "listOsTypes " command to work with.

$.ajax({
            url: createURL("listOsTypes"),
            dataType: "json"


$.ajax({

            url: createURL("listOsCategories") - This has been created by you.



This looks perfectly ok . I apologize for the inconvenience caused.

Question - Any reasons for setting the "async" variable to "False" under the OStype ID category because as far as I know we keep "async" to true for all the list operations ? Please correct me in case I am missing out on something here.
/*

$.ajax({

                                                     url: createURL(apiCmd),

                                                     dataType: "json",

                                                     async: false, //true

                                                     success: function(json


*/
@Brian - I have tested this functionality on my set up and it's working fine .You might want to review it once as well before you could merge it with the apache branch.

Regards,
Pranav

From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:05 PM
To: Brian Federle
Cc: Pranav Saxena; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>; Jessica Wang
Subject: Re: UI tickets: Review request

Hi Pranav,

Excuse me, I can't understand what you mean from here "...however since the backend API command hasn't been implemented for listing the specific OS types". Could you please clarify which API should be implemented? Because I've used already exists API commands "listOsCategories" and "listOsTypes". For "listOsTypes" I use param "oscategoryid" to get only OsTypes from specific Category.

Best regards,
Olga
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>> wrote:
That is a good idea too, I agree.

Also keep in mind that it will require a fair bit of UI testing too, since
this would affect numerous dialog boxes and forms throughout the UI.

-Brian

On 6/25/12 1:04 PM, "Pranav Saxena" <pr...@citrix.com>> wrote:

>Hi Olga ,
>
>I reviewed your code for the following bug which you raised -
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292 . This looks like a more
>modular improvement in displaying the OS types as split categories. Your
>patch looks good however since the backend API command hasn't been
>implemented for listing the specific OS types , you'll have to probably
>wait a bit for this patch of yours to be merged ( Where you have written
>"api command" explicitly in your patch ).
>
>The idea definitely looks good to me.
>
>@Brian/Jessica - what are your suggestions for the same ?
>
>Regards,
>Pranav
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:56 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>
>Subject: UI tickets: Review request
>
>Hi,
>
>Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
>
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
>ticket last comment
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
>latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
>Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
>correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already
>discussed with Jessica.
>
>Thanks,
>Olga




RE: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>.
Hi olga,

I got the point you are trying to make. I thought that the "listOSCategories" command did not exist before and we just had  "listOsTypes " command to work with.

$.ajax({
            url: createURL("listOsTypes"),
            dataType: "json"


$.ajax({

            url: createURL("listOsCategories") - This has been created by you.



This looks perfectly ok . I apologize for the inconvenience caused.

Question - Any reasons for setting the "async" variable to "False" under the OStype ID category because as far as I know we keep "async" to true for all the list operations ? Please correct me in case I am missing out on something here.
/*

$.ajax({

                                                     url: createURL(apiCmd),

                                                     dataType: "json",

                                                     async: false, //true

                                                     success: function(json


*/
@Brian - I have tested this functionality on my set up and it's working fine .You might want to review it once as well before you could merge it with the apache branch.

Regards,
Pranav

From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:05 PM
To: Brian Federle
Cc: Pranav Saxena; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jessica Wang
Subject: Re: UI tickets: Review request

Hi Pranav,

Excuse me, I can't understand what you mean from here "...however since the backend API command hasn't been implemented for listing the specific OS types". Could you please clarify which API should be implemented? Because I've used already exists API commands "listOsCategories" and "listOsTypes". For "listOsTypes" I use param "oscategoryid" to get only OsTypes from specific Category.

Best regards,
Olga
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>> wrote:
That is a good idea too, I agree.

Also keep in mind that it will require a fair bit of UI testing too, since
this would affect numerous dialog boxes and forms throughout the UI.

-Brian

On 6/25/12 1:04 PM, "Pranav Saxena" <pr...@citrix.com>> wrote:

>Hi Olga ,
>
>I reviewed your code for the following bug which you raised -
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292 . This looks like a more
>modular improvement in displaying the OS types as split categories. Your
>patch looks good however since the backend API command hasn't been
>implemented for listing the specific OS types , you'll have to probably
>wait a bit for this patch of yours to be merged ( Where you have written
>"api command" explicitly in your patch ).
>
>The idea definitely looks good to me.
>
>@Brian/Jessica - what are your suggestions for the same ?
>
>Regards,
>Pranav
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:56 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>
>Subject: UI tickets: Review request
>
>Hi,
>
>Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
>
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
>ticket last comment
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
>latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
>Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
>correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already
>discussed with Jessica.
>
>Thanks,
>Olga


Re: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Olga Smola <ol...@gmail.com>.
Hi Pranav,

Excuse me, I can't understand what you mean from here "...however since the
backend API command hasn't been implemented for listing the specific OS
types". Could you please clarify which API should be implemented? Because
I've used already exists API commands "listOsCategories" and "listOsTypes".
For "listOsTypes" I use param "oscategoryid" to get only OsTypes from
specific Category.

Best regards,
Olga

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>wrote:

> That is a good idea too, I agree.
>
> Also keep in mind that it will require a fair bit of UI testing too, since
> this would affect numerous dialog boxes and forms throughout the UI.
>
> -Brian
>
> On 6/25/12 1:04 PM, "Pranav Saxena" <pr...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Olga ,
> >
> >I reviewed your code for the following bug which you raised -
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292 . This looks like a more
> >modular improvement in displaying the OS types as split categories. Your
> >patch looks good however since the backend API command hasn't been
> >implemented for listing the specific OS types , you'll have to probably
> >wait a bit for this patch of yours to be merged ( Where you have written
> >"api command" explicitly in your patch ).
> >
> >The idea definitely looks good to me.
> >
> >@Brian/Jessica - what are your suggestions for the same ?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Pranav
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:56 PM
> >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: UI tickets: Review request
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
> >
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
> >ticket last comment
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
> >http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
> >latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
> >Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
> >correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already
> >discussed with Jessica.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Olga
>
>

Re: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>.
That is a good idea too, I agree.

Also keep in mind that it will require a fair bit of UI testing too, since
this would affect numerous dialog boxes and forms throughout the UI.

-Brian

On 6/25/12 1:04 PM, "Pranav Saxena" <pr...@citrix.com> wrote:

>Hi Olga ,
>
>I reviewed your code for the following bug which you raised -
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292 . This looks like a more
>modular improvement in displaying the OS types as split categories. Your
>patch looks good however since the backend API command hasn't been
>implemented for listing the specific OS types , you'll have to probably
>wait a bit for this patch of yours to be merged ( Where you have written
>"api command" explicitly in your patch ).
>
>The idea definitely looks good to me.
>
>@Brian/Jessica - what are your suggestions for the same ?
>
>Regards,
>Pranav
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:56 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: UI tickets: Review request
>
>Hi,
>
>Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
>
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
>ticket last comment
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
>latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
>Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
>correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already
>discussed with Jessica.
>
>Thanks,
>Olga


RE: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>.
Hi Olga ,

I reviewed your code for the following bug which you raised - http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292 . This looks like a more modular improvement in displaying the OS types as split categories. Your patch looks good however since the backend API command hasn't been implemented for listing the specific OS types , you'll have to probably wait a bit for this patch of yours to be merged ( Where you have written "api command" explicitly in your patch ). 

The idea definitely looks good to me. 

@Brian/Jessica - what are your suggestions for the same ?

Regards,
Pranav


-----Original Message-----
From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.smola@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:56 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: UI tickets: Review request

Hi,

Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:

http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the ticket last comment
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already discussed with Jessica.

Thanks,
Olga

RE: UI tickets: Review request - CS-15026 DeployVm dialog, Templates tab: have to make listTemplates/listIsos calls based on what is selected on the previous step (Template or ISO)

Posted by Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com>.
The patch of CS-15026 looks good to me.
I just pushed it into to master branch.


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Federle 
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:15 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Jessica Wang
Subject: Re: UI tickets: Review request

Hey Olga, I'll review the tickets below that are not commented on yet.

Jessica, would you be able to check out CS-15026 when you have the chance?

Thanks,
Brian

On 6/20/12 8:26 AM, "Olga Smola" <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
>
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
>ticket last comment
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
>latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
>Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
>correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already discussed
>with Jessica.
>
>Thanks,
>Olga


Re: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>.
CS-14110 was verified and pushed to master.

http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110

On 6/20/12 2:24 PM, "Brian Federle" <Br...@citrix.com> wrote:

>CS-15286 was verified and pushed to master.
>
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>
>
>On 6/20/12 11:14 AM, "Brian Federle" <Br...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>Hey Olga, I'll review the tickets below that are not commented on yet.
>>
>>Jessica, would you be able to check out CS-15026 when you have the
>>chance?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Brian
>>
>>On 6/20/12 8:26 AM, "Olga Smola" <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
>>>
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
>>>ticket last comment
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
>>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
>>>latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with
>>>Jessica
>>>Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
>>>correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already
>>>discussed
>>>with Jessica.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Olga
>>
>


Re: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>.
CS-15286 was verified and pushed to master.

http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286


On 6/20/12 11:14 AM, "Brian Federle" <Br...@citrix.com> wrote:

>Hey Olga, I'll review the tickets below that are not commented on yet.
>
>Jessica, would you be able to check out CS-15026 when you have the chance?
>
>Thanks,
>Brian
>
>On 6/20/12 8:26 AM, "Olga Smola" <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
>>
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
>>ticket last comment
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
>>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
>>latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
>>Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
>>correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already
>>discussed
>>with Jessica.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Olga
>


Re: UI tickets: Review request

Posted by Brian Federle <Br...@citrix.com>.
Hey Olga, I'll review the tickets below that are not commented on yet.

Jessica, would you be able to check out CS-15026 when you have the chance?

Thanks,
Brian

On 6/20/12 8:26 AM, "Olga Smola" <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Could you please review my patches for the following tickets:
>
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15026
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15292
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14110
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15290
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15286
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14047
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15287 - Please take a look at the
>ticket last comment
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15315
>http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-4460 - Please take a look at the
>latest ticket comment. There is a problem, already discussed with Jessica
>Wang, but not completed, still need feedback, maybe some ideas how to
>correct. If you have ideas, write to me and I'll forward already discussed
>with Jessica.
>
>Thanks,
>Olga