You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/26 16:44:58 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (CXF-5970) review org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.ProviderFactory.Message*ReaderComparator

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sergey Beryozkin reassigned CXF-5970:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin

> review org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.ProviderFactory.Message*ReaderComparator
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5970
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5970
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>
> Actually the task can be rephrase saying rework org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.ProviderFactory#*Comparators
> Current implementations don't seem to have an absolute order which means sorting is not as deterministic as it should be under java >= 7.
> Other point is as a user you set a List of providers (you probably already sorted if important) so you want to ensure *your* order is respected at runtime (ie org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.ProviderFactory#message[Readers|Writers] respect it).
> If you think this sorting is important maybe introducing in org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.AbstractJAXRSFactoryBean and org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.ProviderFactory a boolean sortProviders can be enough to prevent calling sortXXX().



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)