You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2000/12/03 06:11:54 UTC

RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS

> rbb         00/12/02 19:31:12
> 
>   Modified:    .        STATUS
>   Log:
>   This STATUS item doesn't belong in APR.
>   
>        * API documentation
>   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
>   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)

Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a generally useful
    entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?



Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 11:22:54PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 11:19 PM
> > 
> > > >        * API documentation
> > > >   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
> > > >   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)
> > > 
> > > Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a 
> > generally useful
> > >     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?
> > 
> > I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
> > the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
> > move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.

Yup. I *just* created APRUTIL last night. While Ryan and I can go hog-wild
and start shifting a bunch of code from Apache and APR over to APRUTIL, it
would be nice to at least hear a bit of other input.

I'm going to send out a detailed plan in a while. This will go to new-httpd
and to dev@apr. (I just realized that new-httpd might not be entirely keyed
in on the new package)

> +1 here, but I'll wait for consensus (assuming, of course, that we leave
> history and tags in their original location, esp. for something like ap_hooks.h)

Absolutely... have no fear on that one.

(and after the copy, the tags will be removed from new loc)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 11:22:54PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 11:19 PM
> > 
> > > >        * API documentation
> > > >   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
> > > >   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)
> > > 
> > > Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a 
> > generally useful
> > >     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?
> > 
> > I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
> > the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
> > move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.

Yup. I *just* created APRUTIL last night. While Ryan and I can go hog-wild
and start shifting a bunch of code from Apache and APR over to APRUTIL, it
would be nice to at least hear a bit of other input.

I'm going to send out a detailed plan in a while. This will go to new-httpd
and to dev@apr. (I just realized that new-httpd might not be entirely keyed
in on the new package)

> +1 here, but I'll wait for consensus (assuming, of course, that we leave
> history and tags in their original location, esp. for something like ap_hooks.h)

Absolutely... have no fear on that one.

(and after the copy, the tags will be removed from new loc)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
> > > Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a 
> > generally useful
> > >     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?
> > 
> > I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
> > the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
> > move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.
> 
> +1 here, but I'll wait for consensus (assuming, of course, that we leave
> history and tags in their original location, esp. for something like ap_hooks.h)

It will all stay in the apache-2.0 repo, but it will not be in the
httpd-2.0 repo, which is what Roy's new repo will be called IIRC.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
> > > Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a 
> > generally useful
> > >     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?
> > 
> > I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
> > the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
> > move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.
> 
> +1 here, but I'll wait for consensus (assuming, of course, that we leave
> history and tags in their original location, esp. for something like ap_hooks.h)

It will all stay in the apache-2.0 repo, but it will not be in the
httpd-2.0 repo, which is what Roy's new repo will be called IIRC.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 11:19 PM
> 
> > >        * API documentation
> > >   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
> > >   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)
> > 
> > Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a 
> generally useful
> >     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?
> 
> I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
> the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
> move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.

+1 here, but I'll wait for consensus (assuming, of course, that we leave
history and tags in their original location, esp. for something like ap_hooks.h)

Bill

RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 11:19 PM
> 
> > >        * API documentation
> > >   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
> > >   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)
> > 
> > Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a 
> generally useful
> >     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?
> 
> I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
> the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
> move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.

+1 here, but I'll wait for consensus (assuming, of course, that we leave
history and tags in their original location, esp. for something like ap_hooks.h)

Bill

RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
> >        * API documentation
> >   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
> >   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)
> 
> Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a generally useful
>     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?

I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS

Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
> >        * API documentation
> >   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
> >   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)
> 
> Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a generally useful
>     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?

I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------