You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Michael Brooks <mi...@michaelbrooks.ca> on 2011/12/17 19:48:40 UTC
Apache CLA: Documentation Contributors
Hello Apache mentors,
Can you please briefly explain our stance on signing the Apache CLA for
contributions to Callback-Docs?
The documentation is a set of markdown files. Some contributions are minor
edits for accuracy, while other contributions will translate the English
documentation to another language (extremely large commit that touches or
creates many files).
Thanks,
Michael
Re: Apache CLA: Documentation Contributors
Posted by Michael Brooks <mi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Ross!
On 2011-12-17, at 1:09 PM, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
> On 17 December 2011 18:48, Michael Brooks <mi...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote:
>> Can you please briefly explain our stance on signing the Apache CLA for
>> contributions to Callback-Docs?
>
> Documentation that is delivered from ASF hardware and/or as part of a
> release is treated the same way as code. What this means is that
> significant contributions will require an iCLA.
>
> The exception to this is documentation that is publicly editable such
> as a wiki. However, such documentation cannot be a part of a release.
>
>> The documentation is a set of markdown files. Some contributions are minor
>> edits for accuracy, while other contributions will translate the English
>> documentation to another language (extremely large commit that touches or
>> creates many files).
>
> With respect to translations see the access levels defined for (our
> brand spanking new) Pootle server:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/translate+pootle+service+auth+levels
>
> Ross
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Apache CLA: Documentation Contributors
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
On 17 December 2011 18:48, Michael Brooks <mi...@michaelbrooks.ca> wrote:
> Can you please briefly explain our stance on signing the Apache CLA for
> contributions to Callback-Docs?
Documentation that is delivered from ASF hardware and/or as part of a
release is treated the same way as code. What this means is that
significant contributions will require an iCLA.
The exception to this is documentation that is publicly editable such
as a wiki. However, such documentation cannot be a part of a release.
> The documentation is a set of markdown files. Some contributions are minor
> edits for accuracy, while other contributions will translate the English
> documentation to another language (extremely large commit that touches or
> creates many files).
With respect to translations see the access levels defined for (our
brand spanking new) Pootle server:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/translate+pootle+service+auth+levels
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com