1.1-BETA3 last call

[Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>]

Now that I have a pretty good handle on the licensing/build issues I think
we can actually get a beta release of shindig 1.1 through the IPMC.
If you'd like to get an issue applied to this release let me know and I'll
apply it.  I was anticipating doing the build on tuesday afternoon.

After that we'll have a BETA4..

Thanks!
Paul

Re: 1.1-BETA3 last call

[David Boyer <ma...@gmail.com>]

Can't tell, I'm having other problems with the samplecontainer right now


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:
> Does Arne's patch fix this for you?
> I tested it locally and the evil/setstate seems to be working.
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:58 AM, David Boyer <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see SHINDIG-1083 fixed.  "SampleContainer uses
>> Content-Type application/x-www-form-urlencoded, even though Shindig
>> Java disallows it"
>>
>> You can't use OAuth in the samplecontainer, if I'm reading that issue
>> correctly.  And my own tests, moving from 1.0, to 1.1 with an OAuth
>> gadget fail with this error.
>>
>



-- 
David S Boyer
mangr3n@gmail.com
703.499.8728(h)
703.408.5395(m)

Re: 1.1-BETA3 last call

[Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>]

Does Arne's patch fix this for you?
I tested it locally and the evil/setstate seems to be working.

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:58 AM, David Boyer <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to see SHINDIG-1083 fixed.  "SampleContainer uses
> Content-Type application/x-www-form-urlencoded, even though Shindig
> Java disallows it"
>
> You can't use OAuth in the samplecontainer, if I'm reading that issue
> correctly.  And my own tests, moving from 1.0, to 1.1 with an OAuth
> gadget fail with this error.
>

Re: 1.1-BETA3 last call

[David Boyer <ma...@gmail.com>]

I'd like to see SHINDIG-1083 fixed.  "SampleContainer uses
Content-Type application/x-www-form-urlencoded, even though Shindig
Java disallows it"

You can't use OAuth in the samplecontainer, if I'm reading that issue
correctly.  And my own tests, moving from 1.0, to 1.1 with an OAuth
gadget fail with this error.

Re: 1.1-BETA3 last call

[Louis Ryan <lr...@google.com>]

Paul

Im working on a patch to upgrade to Neko to 1.9.13 which also removes cleans
up the parser usage in general. Should be in by this evening.


-Louis

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Chabot <ch...@google.com> wrote:

> Awesome, thanks!
>
> No blockers from my perspective then
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:
>
> > I cleaned out the rhino jar that was buried there.  It was totally
> > unnecessary.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Chris Chabot <ch...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The one remaining issue I had with the maven PHP packaging was that it
> > > included rhino (which is located in features/...something../bin) in the
> > > distribution.
> > >
> > > The problem reported was that it's license wasn't mentioned in the
> > > php/LICENSE file, which I guess I could add, but I would much prefer to
> > > just
> > > not include it in the php distro, it's just wasting bytes and not used
> at
> > > all.
> > >
> > > Has anyone been able to look at that since that was reported? My maven
> > > knowledge is near statistical 0 so I'm not really the person who's
> going
> > to
> > > be able to figure out how to include / remove it without breaking stuff
> > on
> > > my first few attempts :)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now that I have a pretty good handle on the licensing/build issues I
> > > think
> > > > we can actually get a beta release of shindig 1.1 through the IPMC.
> > > > If you'd like to get an issue applied to this release let me know and
> > > I'll
> > > > apply it.  I was anticipating doing the build on tuesday afternoon.
> > > >
> > > > After that we'll have a BETA4..
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: 1.1-BETA3 last call

[Chris Chabot <ch...@google.com>]

Awesome, thanks!

No blockers from my perspective then

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> wrote:

> I cleaned out the rhino jar that was buried there.  It was totally
> unnecessary.
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Chris Chabot <ch...@google.com> wrote:
>
> > The one remaining issue I had with the maven PHP packaging was that it
> > included rhino (which is located in features/...something../bin) in the
> > distribution.
> >
> > The problem reported was that it's license wasn't mentioned in the
> > php/LICENSE file, which I guess I could add, but I would much prefer to
> > just
> > not include it in the php distro, it's just wasting bytes and not used at
> > all.
> >
> > Has anyone been able to look at that since that was reported? My maven
> > knowledge is near statistical 0 so I'm not really the person who's going
> to
> > be able to figure out how to include / remove it without breaking stuff
> on
> > my first few attempts :)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Now that I have a pretty good handle on the licensing/build issues I
> > think
> > > we can actually get a beta release of shindig 1.1 through the IPMC.
> > > If you'd like to get an issue applied to this release let me know and
> > I'll
> > > apply it.  I was anticipating doing the build on tuesday afternoon.
> > >
> > > After that we'll have a BETA4..
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Paul
> > >
> >
>

Re: 1.1-BETA3 last call

[Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com>]

I cleaned out the rhino jar that was buried there.  It was totally
unnecessary.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Chris Chabot <ch...@google.com> wrote:

> The one remaining issue I had with the maven PHP packaging was that it
> included rhino (which is located in features/...something../bin) in the
> distribution.
>
> The problem reported was that it's license wasn't mentioned in the
> php/LICENSE file, which I guess I could add, but I would much prefer to
> just
> not include it in the php distro, it's just wasting bytes and not used at
> all.
>
> Has anyone been able to look at that since that was reported? My maven
> knowledge is near statistical 0 so I'm not really the person who's going to
> be able to figure out how to include / remove it without breaking stuff on
> my first few attempts :)
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Now that I have a pretty good handle on the licensing/build issues I
> think
> > we can actually get a beta release of shindig 1.1 through the IPMC.
> > If you'd like to get an issue applied to this release let me know and
> I'll
> > apply it.  I was anticipating doing the build on tuesday afternoon.
> >
> > After that we'll have a BETA4..
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Paul
> >
>

Re: 1.1-BETA3 last call

[Chris Chabot <ch...@google.com>]

The one remaining issue I had with the maven PHP packaging was that it
included rhino (which is located in features/...something../bin) in the
distribution.

The problem reported was that it's license wasn't mentioned in the
php/LICENSE file, which I guess I could add, but I would much prefer to just
not include it in the php distro, it's just wasting bytes and not used at
all.

Has anyone been able to look at that since that was reported? My maven
knowledge is near statistical 0 so I'm not really the person who's going to
be able to figure out how to include / remove it without breaking stuff on
my first few attempts :)

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com> wrote:

> Now that I have a pretty good handle on the licensing/build issues I think
> we can actually get a beta release of shindig 1.1 through the IPMC.
> If you'd like to get an issue applied to this release let me know and I'll
> apply it.  I was anticipating doing the build on tuesday afternoon.
>
> After that we'll have a BETA4..
>
> Thanks!
> Paul
>