You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "lushilun (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/08/03 07:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-29965) Race in executor shutdown handling can lead to executor never fully unregistering

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17169774#comment-17169774 ] 

lushilun commented on SPARK-29965:
----------------------------------

I have the same issue on Spark 2.4.4 when i run the Spark SQL: select * from table_a where column not in (select column from table_b). Logs show:

WARN BlockManagerMasterEndpoint: Error trying to remove broadcast 258143 from block manager BlockManagerId

And the job is always running. I have known that the sql of "not in (select ..) " will broadcast many of blocks. But I wonder how can i handle this type of issues when running other Spark SQL?

> Race in executor shutdown handling can lead to executor never fully unregistering
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-29965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29965
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Spark Core
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Marcelo Masiero Vanzin
>            Priority: Major
>
> I ran into a situation that I had never noticed before, but I seem to be able to hit with just a few retries when using K8S with dynamic allocation.
> Basically, there's a race when killing an executor, where it may send a heartbeat to the driver right at the wrong time during shutdown, e.g.:
> {noformat}
> 19/11/19 21:14:05 INFO CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend: Driver commanded a shutdown
> 19/11/19 21:14:05 INFO Executor: Told to re-register on heartbeat
> 19/11/19 21:14:05 INFO BlockManager: BlockManager BlockManagerId(10, 192.168.3.99, 39923, None) re-registering with master
> 19/11/19 21:14:05 INFO BlockManagerMaster: Registering BlockManager BlockManagerId(10, 192.168.3.99, 39923, None)
> 19/11/19 21:14:05 INFO BlockManagerMaster: Registered BlockManager BlockManagerId(10, 192.168.3.99, 39923, None)
> 19/11/19 21:14:06 INFO BlockManager: Reporting 0 blocks to the master.
> {noformat}
> On the driver side it will happily re-register the executor (time diff is just because of time zone in log4j config):
> {noformat}
> 19/11/19 13:14:05 INFO BlockManagerMasterEndpoint: Trying to remove executor 10 from BlockManagerMaster.
> 19/11/19 13:14:05 INFO BlockManagerMasterEndpoint: Removing block manager BlockManagerId(10, 192.168.3.99, 39923, None)
> 19/11/19 13:14:05 INFO BlockManagerMaster: Removed 10 successfully in removeExecutor
> 19/11/19 13:14:05 INFO DAGScheduler: Shuffle files lost for executor: 10 (epoch 18)
> {noformat}
> And a little later:
> {noformat}
> 19/11/19 13:14:05 DEBUG HeartbeatReceiver: Received heartbeat from unknown executor 10
> 19/11/19 13:14:05 INFO BlockManagerMasterEndpoint: Registering block manager 192.168.3.99:39923 with 413.9 MiB RAM, BlockManagerId(10, 192.168.3.99, 39923, None)
> {noformat}
> This becomes a problem later, where you start to see period exceptions in the driver's logs:
> {noformat}
> 19/11/19 13:14:39 WARN BlockManagerMasterEndpoint: Error trying to remove broadcast 4 from block manager BlockManagerId(10, 192.168.3.99, 39923, None)
> java.io.IOException: Failed to send RPC RPC 4999007301825869809 to /10.65.55.240:14233: java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException
>         at org.apache.spark.network.client.TransportClient$RpcChannelListener.handleFailure(TransportClient.java:362)
>         at org.apache.spark.network.client.TransportClient$StdChannelListener.operationComplete(TransportClient.java:339)
>         at io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultPromise.notifyListener0(DefaultPromise.java:577)
>         at io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultPromise.notifyListenersNow(DefaultPromise.java:551)
> {noformat}
> That happens every time some code calls into the block manager to request stuff from all executors. Meaning that the dead executor re-registered, and then was never removed from the block manager.
> I found a few races in the code that can lead to this situation. I'll post a PR once I test it more.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org