You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@superset.apache.org by Beto Dealmeida <ro...@dealmeida.net.INVALID> on 2021/11/03 22:47:27 UTC
[VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Hi Superset community,
This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
<https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number
of votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Thank you,
--Beto Dealmeida
Re: [VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Posted by Ville Brofeldt <vi...@gmail.com>.
Really looking forward to this work to get started! +1 (binding)
Ville
> On 4. Nov 2021, at 0.47, Beto Dealmeida <ro...@dealmeida.net.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi Superset community,
>
> This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thank you,
> --Beto Dealmeida
Re: [VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Posted by Diego Pucci <di...@gmail.com>.
+1
Il giorno ven 5 nov 2021 alle ore 13:21 Michael S. Molina <
michael.s.molina@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1
>
> > On Nov 4, 2021, at 4:04 PM, John Bodley <jo...@airbnb.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 4:24 PM Elizabeth Thompson <el...@preset.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 binding
> >>
> >>> On Nov 3, 2021, at 3:47 PM, Beto Dealmeida
> <ro...@dealmeida.net.INVALID>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Superset community,
> >>>
> >>> This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets <
> >> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number
> >> of votes are reached.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote accordingly:
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>> --Beto Dealmeida
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Posted by "Michael S. Molina" <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1
> On Nov 4, 2021, at 4:04 PM, John Bodley <jo...@airbnb.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 4:24 PM Elizabeth Thompson <el...@preset.io>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2021, at 3:47 PM, Beto Dealmeida <ro...@dealmeida.net.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Superset community,
>>>
>>> This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets <
>> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number
>> of votes are reached.
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> --Beto Dealmeida
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Posted by John Bodley <jo...@airbnb.com.INVALID>.
+1 binding
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 4:24 PM Elizabeth Thompson <el...@preset.io>
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> > On Nov 3, 2021, at 3:47 PM, Beto Dealmeida <ro...@dealmeida.net.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Superset community,
> >
> > This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets <
> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --Beto Dealmeida
>
>
Re: [VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Posted by Elizabeth Thompson <el...@preset.io>.
+1 binding
> On Nov 3, 2021, at 3:47 PM, Beto Dealmeida <ro...@dealmeida.net.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi Superset community,
>
> This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thank you,
> --Beto Dealmeida
Re: [VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Posted by Maxime Beauchemin <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:14 AM Daniel Gaspar <dp...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On 2021/11/03 22:47:27 Beto Dealmeida wrote:
> > Hi Superset community,
> >
> > This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
> > <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --Beto Dealmeida
> >
>
Re: [VOTE][SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
Posted by Daniel Gaspar <dp...@apache.org>.
+1 binding
On 2021/11/03 22:47:27 Beto Dealmeida wrote:
> Hi Superset community,
>
> This is a call to vote for [SIP-68] A better model for Datasets
> <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/14909>.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 1 week or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thank you,
> --Beto Dealmeida
>