You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by James Delaney <bl...@txis.com> on 1997/09/03 19:40:03 UTC

general/1091: mod_unique_id is listed as a feature of 1.3 but is not present in 1.3a1

>Number:         1091
>Category:       general
>Synopsis:       mod_unique_id is listed as a feature of 1.3 but is not present in 1.3a1
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache (Apache HTTP Project)
>State:          open
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Sep  3 10:40:02 1997
>Originator:     blank@txis.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        1.3a1
>Environment:
Linux mumu 2.0.29 #7 Tue May 6 21:46:39 CDT 1997 i486
>Description:
According to file:
http://www.apache.org/docs/new_features_1_3.html
A module called mod_unique_id can be included to
generate a unique identifier...
When searching through the source of:
http://www.apache.org/dist/apache_1.3a1.tar.gz
The module does not appear to be included.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
Update http://www.apache.org/docs/new_features_1_3.html or
http://www.apache.org/dist/apache_1.3a1.tar.gz
to reflect correct information
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Re: general/1091: mod_unique_id is listed as a feature of 1.3 but is not present in 1.3a1

Posted by Alexei Kosut <ak...@organic.com>.
On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, James Delaney wrote:

[from apache-bugdb]

> According to file:
> http://www.apache.org/docs/new_features_1_3.html
> A module called mod_unique_id can be included to
> generate a unique identifier...
> When searching through the source of:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/apache_1.3a1.tar.gz
> The module does not appear to be included.

Hmm. I was pretty sure I had stuck the copy of new_features_1_3.html to
the APACHE_1_3a1 tag, explicitly to prevent this from happening. It
appears someone replaced the docs directory with a new one from apachen,
and the tags got removed (the two files that had them were
new_features_1_3.html and windows.html).

They should be added back.

-- Alexei Kosut <ak...@organic.com>