You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2015/12/01 10:33:24 UTC

[Bug 58593] mod_proxy wrong decision between http and ws

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593

--- Comment #10 from Tabby <s....@gmail.com> ---
Sorry, but I'm a bit confused.
Since using the same URL for ws(s) and http(s) seems to be perfectly legal
(although I'd always go with distinct URL patterns), I'm not sure about what
you are suggesting to do.

At the moment, is there a valid alternative to this?
---
RewriteRule ^/ws/live/(.*)  %{ENV:proto}://vip-be/wwgw/var/$1 [P,QSA,L]
<Proxy http://vip-be/wwgw/var>
  ProxySet smax=0 ttl=15
</Proxy>
---

Furthermore: is it necessary, in your opinion, to add a <Proxy> block also for
ws, in order to keep its connection alive or is it worthless because of its
long-living nature?

Thanks
ST

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org