You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> on 2006/12/18 09:39:48 UTC
[Vote] Release 2.1.10
Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release.
The release candidate can be downloaded from:
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/
The corresponding sources are under:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/tags/RC_2_1_10/
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
If the vote passes, I will rename the tag to RELEASE_2_1_10,
rename the downloadable archives, sign them etc. and put them up for
download.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> Those tests do not involve any sitemap processing, so
> JXTemplateGenerator is not involved. It's more likely that the upgrade
> of the XML libs [1] caused this not quite unwanted side effects
> (removing a marked DIRTY HACK). But this commit was on 27th of November.
> If the tests were really successful last week, I don't know what caused
> this failure now.
>
Your recent changes fixed these problems for me, thanks! - so our test
cases were buggy and I think this is not a showstopper for the release.
> But for me now
> org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManagerTestCase fails
> in testExecuteRunnablelonglong:
This one fails for me from time to time; invoking the test again runs
successfully...
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 18.12.2006 20:34, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>> all the automated tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype fail
>> (DynamicSelectionListTestCase,EnumSelectionListTestCase,FlowJXPathSelectionListTestCase).
>>
>> IIRC the same tests passed last week, anyone know what could have
>> changed?
>
> As forms block is mounted from trunk and trunk's block only has the
> JXTemplateGenerator from template block I was quite sure not to break
> anything.
Those tests do not involve any sitemap processing, so
JXTemplateGenerator is not involved. It's more likely that the upgrade
of the XML libs [1] caused this not quite unwanted side effects
(removing a marked DIRTY HACK). But this commit was on 27th of November.
If the tests were really successful last week, I don't know what caused
this failure now.
But for me now
org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManagerTestCase fails
in testExecuteRunnablelonglong:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Unexpected Exception at
org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManagerTestCase.
testExecuteRunnablelonglong(DefaultRunnableManagerTestCase.java:758)
Or a bit verbose:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
Unexpected method call debug("Executing command EasyMock for
interface java.lang.Runnable in pool "default", schedule with
interval=100"):
debug("Executing command EasyMock for interface java.lang.Runnable
in pool "default", schedule with interval=100"): expected: 0, actual: 1
debug("Exiting loop"): expected: 1, actual: 0
at
org.easymock.internal.ObjectMethodsFilter.invoke(ObjectMethodsFilter.java:44)
at $Proxy1.debug(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManager$ExecutionInfo.execute(DefaultRunnableManager.java:829)
at
org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManager.run(DefaultRunnableManager.java:485)
at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
Unexpected method call isDebugEnabled():
isDebugEnabled(): expected: 0, actual: 1
debug("Exiting loop"): expected: 1, actual: 0
at
org.easymock.internal.ObjectMethodsFilter.invoke(ObjectMethodsFilter.java:44)
at $Proxy1.isDebugEnabled(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManager.dispose(DefaultRunnableManager.java:258)
at
org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManagerTestCase.testExecuteRunnablelonglong(DefaultRunnableManagerTestCase.java:752)
Can somebody have a look on this one?
Jörg
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&sortby=date&revision=479509
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 18.12.2006 10:42, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> all the automated tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype fail
> (DynamicSelectionListTestCase,EnumSelectionListTestCase,FlowJXPathSelectionListTestCase).
>
> IIRC the same tests passed last week, anyone know what could have changed?
This is probably due to my change to fix some samples:
Commit:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-cvs&m=116638665114040&w=4
Thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=116640290515848&w=4
Jira messages:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=116639428428700&w=4
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=116639494414680&w=4
As forms block is mounted from trunk and trunk's block only has the
JXTemplateGenerator from template block I was quite sure not to break
anything. I'll have a look on what the tests are actually checking for
and see if it is the test or the result that is broken.
Jörg
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On 12/18/06, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> ...The release candidate can be downloaded from:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/..
>
> On my macosx system with either JDK 1.4.2 or 1.5, all the automated
> tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype fail
> (DynamicSelectionListTestCase,EnumSelectionListTestCase,FlowJXPathSelectionListTestCase).
>
> IIRC the same tests passed last week, anyone know what could have changed?
>
Same here on windows...sigh...the question is now, are the test cases
wrong or do we really have bugs?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On 12/18/06, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
> > ...The release candidate can be downloaded from:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/..
On my macosx system with either JDK 1.4.2 or 1.5, all the automated
tests from org.apache.cocoon.forms.datatype fail
(DynamicSelectionListTestCase,EnumSelectionListTestCase,FlowJXPathSelectionListTestCase).
IIRC the same tests passed last week, anyone know what could have changed?
-Bertrand
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release.
>
> The release candidate can be downloaded from:
> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/
>
> The corresponding sources are under:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/tags/RC_2_1_10/
>
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 18.12.2006 09:39, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release.
+1
Jörg
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Giacomo Pati <gi...@apache.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release.
+1
Ciao and thanks
- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFiUFNLNdJvZjjVZARAjb4AJ9n23UPYnTD17KNLQhsQy0UQZn2TACgziHx
ECR/9mnJdEHPhNAmpEdgFOg=
=SfvS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Peter Hunsberger <pe...@gmail.com>.
On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
> IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes:
> a) Added the fixes for the failing junit tests in cforms
> b) Added the patch for a failing xsp soap sample
> c) Removed the remark about jdk 1.3
>
> So, you can download the new version from
> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/
>
> The corresponding sources are under:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/tags/RC_2_1_10/
>
> Everything else stays the same! Which means *if* the vote passes,
> I will release on thursday.
>
> All votes so far are invalid (there was only one from me anyway)!
+1 !!!
--
Peter Hunsberger
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Jeroen Reijn <j....@hippo.nl>.
Here is my (non-binding) +1 :-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen Reijn
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> My +1 too.
>
> Many thanks guys.
>
> regards Jeremy
>
> On 19 Dec 2006, at 12:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing.
>>
>> +1 on the release.
>
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Jeremy Quinn <je...@apache.org>.
My +1 too.
Many thanks guys.
regards Jeremy
On 19 Dec 2006, at 12:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing.
>
> +1 on the release.
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@codeconsult.ch>.
On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...So here are the md5's:
> MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.zip) = 3dfee1d2d8b5f3e761eb763809249073
> MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.tar.gz) = d073b36274ab359b59bbb760e083a934...
Thanks Carsten, and thanks Joerg for the bugfixing.
+1 on the release.
On my macosx/JDK1.5, all junit tests pass, and one of the htmlunit
tests fails: RedirectTestCase, testSendStatus fails, NPE in
IOUtils.copy, looks like a a defect in the test code, not a release
blocker IMO.
-Bertrand
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> So here are the md5's:
> MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.tar.gz) = d073b36274ab359b59bbb760e083a934
-0 ... meaning that i don't want to stop the release,
however i am concerned that we are not following the new
licensing which all releases after early November are
asked to follow.
A while ago i said that although i had done all the work
to replace the license headers in the source files, there
is still the task of adding whatever third-party attributions
into the NOTICE.txt and declaring the licenses in LICENSE.txt
-David
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>> ...IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes...
>
> Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release
> candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements
> which try to create files like d:/enum.xml.
>
As I have the right os they worked for me :) Anyway, thanks for finding
this!
> I have committed fixes, all junit tests pass on my macosx system now.
>
> Five of the htmlunit tests fail here, I won't have time to investigate ATM.
>
> If you redo the distribution files, could you post the new md5 digests
> here to avoid any confusion?
Yepp, I just did the 3rd attempt which will be the final one; if we find
anything
else I will reschedule the release for the end of the year and start
from scratch.
So here are the md5's:
MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.zip) = 3dfee1d2d8b5f3e761eb763809249073
MD5 (cocoon-2.1.10rc-src.tar.gz) = d073b36274ab359b59bbb760e083a934
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz <at> apache.org> writes:
> Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release
> candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements
> which try to create files like d:/enum.xml.
Oh, sorry for this. Needed this for comparing the files. Carsten should probably
clean up his D: drive as well.
If i could execute the tests in Eclipse, I would not need those debug statements
:-/ After fixing the classpath by adding test-resources dir for *.xtest files, I
got NPEs somewhere in Xalan.
Remote debugging the test (ant target 'junit-test-debug' or so) did neither work
due to ClassNotFoundException. It probably only works with core tests.
Regards
Jörg
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On 12/19/06, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes...
Sorry to rain on this party again, but Junit tests in your release
candidates fail on non-Windows systems, due to debugging statements
which try to create files like d:/enum.xml.
I have committed fixes, all junit tests pass on my macosx system now.
Five of the htmlunit tests fail here, I won't have time to investigate ATM.
If you redo the distribution files, could you post the new md5 digests
here to avoid any confusion?
-Bertrand
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Alfred Nathaniel <an...@apache.org>.
+1
Cheers, Alfred.
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.10
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
IMPORTANT: I reassembled the release as I included recent changes:
a) Added the fixes for the failing junit tests in cforms
b) Added the patch for a failing xsp soap sample
c) Removed the remark about jdk 1.3
So, you can download the new version from
http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/
The corresponding sources are under:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/tags/RC_2_1_10/
Everything else stays the same! Which means *if* the vote passes,
I will release on thursday.
All votes so far are invalid (there was only one from me anyway)!
So please cast your votes
Carsten
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please cast your votes on the 2.1.10 release.
>
> The release candidate can be downloaded from:
> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/cocoon/
>
> The corresponding sources are under:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/tags/RC_2_1_10/
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> If the vote passes, I will rename the tag to RELEASE_2_1_10,
> rename the downloadable archives, sign them etc. and put them up for
> download.
>
> Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/