You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2016/03/25 07:52:10 UTC
[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Alex Harui
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the clarifications :)
I believe it might be good idea to use standard jar file locations
(like maven repo) and standard way of integration, and reduce
dependendency on people.a.o :)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/16, 9:29 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hello Alex,
>>
>>just curious, why are you using
>>http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>instead of
>>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.8/apache-rat-0.8
>>.jar
>>(or even better
>>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.11/apache-rat-0.
>>11.jar)
>>?
>
> Way back when I first did this, 0.8 was what I had on my system, and I
> didn't want to find out if the output format might change in newer
> versions. The Ant script does some string replacement on the output to
> try to make it easier to find binary files in the package.
>
> But I just made the switch to 0.11 and it seems ok.
>
> -Alex
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/28/16, 9:29 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello Alex,
>
>just curious, why are you using
>http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>instead of
>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.8/apache-rat-0.8
>.jar
>(or even better
>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.11/apache-rat-0.
>11.jar)
>?
Way back when I first did this, 0.8 was what I had on my system, and I
didn't want to find out if the output format might change in newer
versions. The Ant script does some string replacement on the output to
try to make it easier to find binary files in the package.
But I just made the switch to 0.11 and it seems ok.
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Alex,
just curious, why are you using
http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
instead of http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.8/apache-rat-0.8.jar
(or even better
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.11/apache-rat-0.11.jar)
?
additionally we are using Apache Rat as part of our maven build
(previously it was used as part of our ant build, and was
auto-downloaded using Ivy)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Ah yes, people.apache.org is no more. I pushed a new approval script.
> Please download it and try again.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/28/16, 6:17 PM, "Mark Kessler" <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Had an error running the ApproveFlexJS.xml
>>
>>
>>
>>D:\PortableDev\FlexJS>ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.6.0
>>-Drc=1
>>
>>Buildfile: D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\ApproveFlexJS.xml
>>
>>install-rat.jar:
>>Getting: http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>To: D:\PortableDev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>>http://people.apache.org
>>/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>>http://people.apache.org
>>/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>>http://people.apache.org
>>/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>Can't get http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar to
>>D:\Portable
>>Dev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>
>>BUILD FAILED
>>D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\ApproveFlexJS.xml:187: Can't get
>>http://people.apache.org/
>>~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar to
>>D:\PortableDev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
>>
>>Total time: 0 seconds
>>
>>
>>-Mark
>>
>>On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alex Harui
>>>
>>>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Ah yes, people.apache.org is no more. I pushed a new approval script.
Please download it and try again.
-Alex
On 3/28/16, 6:17 PM, "Mark Kessler" <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Had an error running the ApproveFlexJS.xml
>
>
>
>D:\PortableDev\FlexJS>ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.6.0
>-Drc=1
>
>Buildfile: D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\ApproveFlexJS.xml
>
>install-rat.jar:
>Getting: http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>To: D:\PortableDev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
>Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>http://people.apache.org
>/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>http://people.apache.org
>/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
>http://people.apache.org
>/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>Can't get http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar to
>D:\Portable
>Dev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
>
>BUILD FAILED
>D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\ApproveFlexJS.xml:187: Can't get
>http://people.apache.org/
>~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar to
>D:\PortableDev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
>
>Total time: 0 seconds
>
>
>-Mark
>
>On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex Harui
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
Had an error running the ApproveFlexJS.xml
D:\PortableDev\FlexJS>ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.6.0
-Drc=1
Buildfile: D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\ApproveFlexJS.xml
install-rat.jar:
Getting: http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
To: D:\PortableDev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
http://people.apache.org
/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
http://people.apache.org
/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
Error opening connection java.io.FileNotFoundException:
http://people.apache.org
/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
Can't get http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar to
D:\Portable
Dev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
BUILD FAILED
D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\ApproveFlexJS.xml:187: Can't get
http://people.apache.org/
~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar to D:\PortableDev\Ant\lib\apache-rat-0.8.jar
Total time: 0 seconds
-Mark
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex Harui
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
HI,
> compc.jar does exist in $ANT_HOME/lib so I’m not sure what causes the above issue. Anyone have any idea?
Sorry I meant to say flexTasks.jar not comic.jar there. Do we perhaps have an issue with different versions of compc/flexTasks.jar?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Is your Falcon the RC I posted or a nightly? I wonder if it is related to
[1]
-Alex
[1] http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2014/04/01/jdk-compatibility.html
On 3/28/16, 3:42 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>
>> On a Mac, when you do getInfo on a file, do those sharing and permission
>> settings map to the 777 bits or are the different?
>
>They show up as read & write to me, staff and everyone.
>
>> What version of Ant and Java are you using?
>
>$ant -version
>Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.3 compiled on December 23 2013
>
>$java -version
>java version "1.8.0_73"
>Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_73-b02)
>Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.73-b02, mixed mode)
>
>Changing java to 1.7 makes no difference and I get the same error
>
>> Any custom class loaders or anything like that?
>
>Nothing I’m aware of.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
> On a Mac, when you do getInfo on a file, do those sharing and permission
> settings map to the 777 bits or are the different?
They show up as read & write to me, staff and everyone.
> What version of Ant and Java are you using?
$ant -version
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.3 compiled on December 23 2013
$java -version
java version "1.8.0_73"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_73-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.73-b02, mixed mode)
Changing java to 1.7 makes no difference and I get the same error
> Any custom class loaders or anything like that?
Nothing I’m aware of.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/28/16, 3:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Check out compc.jar's permissions in:
>>
>>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin
>>/c
>> ompiler/generated/dist/sdk
>
>No luck changing to 777 on the jar and directory and still got the same
>error :-(
>
>java -jar compc.jar works as expected
>
>ant -v showsthe exception is from flex.ant.FlexTask.resolveClass:
>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/fr
>ameworks/projects/Core/build.xml:159: File does not exist: compc.jar
> at flex.ant.FlexTask.resolveClass(Unknown Source)
> at flex.ant.FlexTask.executeOutOfProcess(Unknown Source)
> at flex.ant.FlexTask.execute(Unknown Source)
> at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:292)
> ...
Yeah, that's the area of code I was looking in.
On a Mac, when you do getInfo on a file, do those sharing and permission
settings map to the 777 bits or are the different?
What version of Ant and Java are you using? Any custom class loaders or
anything like that?
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Check out compc.jar's permissions in:
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/c
> ompiler/generated/dist/sdk
No luck changing to 777 on the jar and directory and still got the same error :-(
java -jar compc.jar works as expected
ant -v showsthe exception is from flex.ant.FlexTask.resolveClass:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/build.xml:159: File does not exist: compc.jar
at flex.ant.FlexTask.resolveClass(Unknown Source)
at flex.ant.FlexTask.executeOutOfProcess(Unknown Source)
at flex.ant.FlexTask.execute(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:292)
...
Given up for now will take another look later today.
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Sorry, grabbed wrong line.
Check out compc.jar's permissions in:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/c
ompiler/generated/dist/sdk
Not just its rwx bits, but any other OS-level user-level permissions.
-Alex
On 3/28/16, 1:06 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>
>>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin
>>/l
>> ib
>
>I don’t have a lib directory - here what I have:
>find . -name "*lib*"
>./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/ant/lib
>./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib
>./compiler/lib
>./compiler.tests/lib
>./js/lib
>./js/libs
>./lib-legacy
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/l
> ib
I don’t have a lib directory - here what I have:
find . -name "*lib*"
./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/ant/lib
./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib
./compiler/lib
./compiler.tests/lib
./js/lib
./js/libs
./lib-legacy
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Totally wild guess, but can you check permissions on compc.jar in
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/l
ib
I don't know the Ant flex-tasks code at all, but it looks like it is
simple Java doing a File.exists() on compc.jar.
-Alex
On 3/27/16, 10:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> How did you get your Falcon build? Is it just an unzip of a binary kit?
>
>Yes it was.
>
>I also tried installing over FlexJS it using the installer script
>provided but that also gives an error:
>
>From the FlexJS base directory:
>ant -f ../../ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/installer.xml
>-DFLEX_HOME=.
>
>movefiles:
>
>BUILD FAILED
>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/
>installer.xml:114:
>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/
>lib does not exist.
>
>> Is there a falcon-flextasks.jar in
>>
>>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin
>>/c
>> ompiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib
>
>Yes there is.
>
>Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> How did you get your Falcon build? Is it just an unzip of a binary kit?
Yes it was.
I also tried installing over FlexJS it using the installer script provided but that also gives an error:
From the FlexJS base directory:
ant -f ../../ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/installer.xml -DFLEX_HOME=.
movefiles:
BUILD FAILED
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/installer.xml:114: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/lib does not exist.
> Is there a falcon-flextasks.jar in
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/c
> ompiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib
Yes there is.
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/27/16, 6:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>HI,
>
>Unable to compile FlexJS - last bit:
>
>compile-extern-swc:
> [echo] Compiling target/externs/Core-0.6.0.swc
> [echo] FLEX_HOME:
>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src
> [echo] FALCON_HOME:
>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/
>compiler/generated/dist/sdk
How did you get your Falcon build? Is it just an unzip of a binary kit?
Is there a falcon-flextasks.jar in
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/c
ompiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
HI,
Unable to compile FlexJS - last bit:
compile-extern-swc:
[echo] Compiling target/externs/Core-0.6.0.swc
[echo] FLEX_HOME: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src
[echo] FALCON_HOME: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/compiler/generated/dist/sdk
BUILD FAILED
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/build.xml:441: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/build.xml:79: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/build.xml:170: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src/frameworks/projects/Core/build.xml:159: File does not exist: compc.jar
compc.jar does exist in $ANT_HOME/lib so I’m not sure what causes the above issue. Anyone have any idea?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> I assumed since MIT is supposedly as friendly as Apache, that all licenses
> in an MIT package were also Category A or B.
Sadly this is not always the case for instance MIT is comparable with GPL but that doesn't mean we can use a MIT licensed bundle containing GPL software in Apache licensed code. Likewise the Apache 2.0 license itself also also compatible with GPL (i.e. GPL software can bundle Apache license software) but not the other way arround.
> I saw your note on the issue. Why couldn't they use some other CC license
> like CC-BY that doesn't have NC and/or ND?
Any Apache comparable licence would be fine, given they license other files under MIT that’s probably the easiest for them.
> The link for CC-A in Legal
> Resolved [2] seems to end up at CC-BY. I've never been clear whether they
> are the same or not. I thought many forms of CC could be used in binary
> packages.
I think that may of recently changed I’ll find the details and post here.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/27/16, 10:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>HI,
>
>> OK, left them this issue
>> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
>
>That probably could of been worded a little differently.
>
>If you look at the bundled SVG file you can clearly see what license it
>is under:
> "fontURL": "http://designmodo.com/flat",
> "designer": "Sergey Shmidt",
> "designerURL": "http://designmodo.com",
> "license": "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported",
> "licenseURL": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/“,
>
>Both the Non Commercial and No Derivatives parts of that license are
>incompatible with the Apache license.
>
>It doesn’t matter if the whole bundle is licensed under MIT. I’m sure you
>know just because a package is under MIT that doesn’t mean that all files
>in that bundle are also licensed MIT. Just like you can bundle
>differently licensed files in an Apache licensed bundle i.e. MIT and BSD
>or even CDDL (for binaries).
I assumed since MIT is supposedly as friendly as Apache, that all licenses
in an MIT package were also Category A or B. I didn't think I had to go
digging through their IP, especially since it was the basis for the
FlatSpark theme.
I saw your note on the issue. Why couldn't they use some other CC license
like CC-BY that doesn't have NC and/or ND? The link for CC-A in Legal
Resolved [2] seems to end up at CC-BY. I've never been clear whether they
are the same or not. I thought many forms of CC could be used in binary
packages.
-Alex
[2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> Regarding the LICENSE in the ASDoc package: Did you see other content in
> there that needs mentioning in LICENSE or is the ALv2 sufficient.
Nothing I could see, just a straight boiler plate Apache 2.0 LICENSE is required I think.
BYW having extra info in LICENSE while incorrect is a licensing issue not an error as such so we could still release that and fix it in a later release.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/29/16, 12:20 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>I need to do more testing of the install script changes before creating
>> another RC.
>
>Perhaps give people a little more time to look at the FlexJS RC as it may
>save another RC if an issue is found? I’ll post my vote s it contains a
>few other minor things I found that someone may want to fix.
The bits will have been available for testing for 72 hours plus the
weekend by time I get around to another RC. Plus the Last Call went out
20 days ago. Back then people wanted to get a release out before the SF
event. Have folks changed their minds?
Regarding the LICENSE in the ASDoc package: Did you see other content in
there that needs mentioning in LICENSE or is the ALv2 sufficient.
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
HI,
> No word from designmodo yet. I've pushed changes to make the fonts an
> optional dependency.
That is also a valid way around the issue, but means more work for the user. [1]
> I need to do more testing of the install script changes before creating
> another RC.
Perhaps give people a little more time to look at the FlexJS RC as it may save another RC if an issue is found? I’ll post my vote s it contains a few other minor things I found that someone may want to fix.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/27/16, 10:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>HI,
>
>> OK, left them this issue
>> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
>
>Anyway fingers crossed they get back to us and this can be resolved
>quickly.
No word from designmodo yet. I've pushed changes to make the fonts an
optional dependency. Only folks who want to use the Flat component set
needs the fonts.
I need to do more testing of the install script changes before creating
another RC.
There is a good chance we won't have a release for the SF event. I know
everyone is busy, but these things are supposed to be found during Last
Call, not when the RC is posted.
-Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
HI,
> OK, left them this issue
> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
That probably could of been worded a little differently.
If you look at the bundled SVG file you can clearly see what license it is under:
"fontURL": "http://designmodo.com/flat",
"designer": "Sergey Shmidt",
"designerURL": "http://designmodo.com",
"license": "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported",
"licenseURL": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/“,
Both the Non Commercial and No Derivatives parts of that license are incompatible with the Apache license.
It doesn’t matter if the whole bundle is licensed under MIT. I’m sure you know just because a package is under MIT that doesn’t mean that all files in that bundle are also licensed MIT. Just like you can bundle differently licensed files in an Apache licensed bundle i.e. MIT and BSD or even CDDL (for binaries).
Anyway fingers crossed they get back to us and this can be resolved quickly.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
OK, left them this issue
https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
-Alex
On 3/27/16, 5:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>JFYI the owners of the code are fairly responsive to licence issues (for
>instance [1]) and tend to give permission to use their stuff (few other
>issues). I think the simplest way to resolve this may be ask can we use
>the font files under an more permissive / Apache compatible licence. We
>should also make clear we are redistributing those files as well when
>asking.
>
>Files in question are probably flat-ui-icons-regular.eot,
>flat-ui-icons-regular.swf, flat-ui-icons-regular.ttf,
>flat-ui-icons-regular.woff and lat-ui-icons-regular.svg. (I looked inside
>the ttf one and it also states it has a non commercial license).
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
>
>1. https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/18
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
JFYI the owners of the code are fairly responsive to licence issues (for instance [1]) and tend to give permission to use their stuff (few other issues). I think the simplest way to resolve this may be ask can we use the font files under an more permissive / Apache compatible licence. We should also make clear we are redistributing those files as well when asking.
Files in question are probably flat-ui-icons-regular.eot, flat-ui-icons-regular.swf, flat-ui-icons-regular.ttf, flat-ui-icons-regular.woff and lat-ui-icons-regular.svg. (I looked inside the ttf one and it also states it has a non commercial license).
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/18
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Just looking throuth the binary release and I notice that this file [1] is licensed with a CC license [2] (look inside the file). Sadly this is not an Apache compatible license. Anyone know the history of that file / can head some light on this? The font has a URL with points to http://designmodo.com which has [3].
Thanks,
Justin
1. apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-bin/frameworks/fonts/flat-ui-icons-regular.svg
2. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
3, http://designmodo.com/license/