You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ruleqa@spamassassin.apache.org by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> on 2018/06/10 19:53:18 UTC
Rule not appearing in masscheck results
Folks:
I recently added a test subrule to my sandbox...
(__JS_HTML_OBFU_01, see:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1832875&r2=1833128&diff_format=h
)
...but it's not showing up in the masscheck results reported on ruleqa at
all.
The SVN daterevs in ruleqa are advancing normally and are beyond the
1833128 commit, so I would expect it to be there. Everything passes lint
here and masscheck has been running lately so it's not that a stupid error
in the rule killed masschecks.
Could somebody take a look at their masscheck environment and see whether
that rule is indeed present?
Any idea why its results wouldn't be showing up on the ruleqa website? Is
ruleqa perhaps having SVN issues and isn't seeing the new rule even though
it is present in results?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...we talk about creating "millions of shovel-ready jobs" for a
society that doesn't really encourage people to pick up a shovel.
-- Mike Rowe, testifying before Congress
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
437 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
Re: Rule not appearing in masscheck results
Posted by David Jones <dj...@ena.com>.
On 06/10/2018 08:37 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, David Jones wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2018 02:53 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>> Folks:
>>>
>>> I recently added a test subrule to my sandbox...
>>>
>>> (__JS_HTML_OBFU_01, see:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1832875&r2=1833128&diff_format=h
>>> )
>>>
>>> ...but it's not showing up in the masscheck results reported on
>>> ruleqa at all.
>>>
>>> The SVN daterevs in ruleqa are advancing normally and are beyond the
>>> 1833128 commit, so I would expect it to be there. Everything passes
>>> lint here and masscheck has been running lately so it's not that a
>>> stupid error in the rule killed masschecks.
>>>
>>> Could somebody take a look at their masscheck environment and see
>>> whether that rule is indeed present?
>>>
>>> Any idea why its results wouldn't be showing up on the ruleqa
>>> website? Is ruleqa perhaps having SVN issues and isn't seeing the new
>>> rule even though it is present in results?
>>
>> I am seeing that rule in the sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf area
>> of my local masscheck work dir. I grep'ed my ham.log and spam.log for
>> that rule and got no hits. This is just a guess without looking at
>> the ruleqa code on the ruleqa server but maybe it won't show up in the
>> ruleqa web interface if there are no hits from any of the masscheck'ers.
>
> There are a bunch of zero-ham zero-spam rules displayed on the ruleqa
> website. I don't think that's it.
>
> I haven't looked at the ruleqa code in a long time, I was speculating
> that if a rule didn't appear in the local SVN repo then any results for
> that rule would be ignored - that is suggested by the fact that it's
> still reporting zeros for rules that don't appear in any of the result
> sets.
>
> Could you check whether the SVN repo on the ruleqa box is stale somehow?
>
>
The masscheck staging area where all of the masscheckers download from
is current since I was able to find that rule on my local masschecker
servers.
The http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org page is currently showing the latest
tagged version of 20180610-r1833258 from yesterday. The current trunk
is 1833317 so we aren't that far off considering the revisions are
shared with other Apache projects in SVN.
I have a script to check the masscheck SVN revision with the latest
tagged revision to make sure we have enough current masscheckers and it
hasn't been emailing the sysadmins list lately -- no news is good news.
--
David Jones
Re: Rule not appearing in masscheck results
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, David Jones wrote:
> On 06/10/2018 02:53 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>> Folks:
>>
>> I recently added a test subrule to my sandbox...
>>
>> (__JS_HTML_OBFU_01, see:
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1832875&r2=1833128&diff_format=h
>> )
>>
>> ...but it's not showing up in the masscheck results reported on ruleqa at
>> all.
>>
>> The SVN daterevs in ruleqa are advancing normally and are beyond the
>> 1833128 commit, so I would expect it to be there. Everything passes lint
>> here and masscheck has been running lately so it's not that a stupid error
>> in the rule killed masschecks.
>>
>> Could somebody take a look at their masscheck environment and see whether
>> that rule is indeed present?
>>
>> Any idea why its results wouldn't be showing up on the ruleqa website? Is
>> ruleqa perhaps having SVN issues and isn't seeing the new rule even though
>> it is present in results?
>
> I am seeing that rule in the sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf area of my
> local masscheck work dir. I grep'ed my ham.log and spam.log for that rule
> and got no hits. This is just a guess without looking at the ruleqa code on
> the ruleqa server but maybe it won't show up in the ruleqa web interface if
> there are no hits from any of the masscheck'ers.
There are a bunch of zero-ham zero-spam rules displayed on the ruleqa
website. I don't think that's it.
I haven't looked at the ruleqa code in a long time, I was speculating that
if a rule didn't appear in the local SVN repo then any results for that
rule would be ignored - that is suggested by the fact that it's still
reporting zeros for rules that don't appear in any of the result sets.
Could you check whether the SVN repo on the ruleqa box is stale somehow?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Care _is_ a right - the government has no business keeping
you from getting it. But forcing somebody else to pay for your
health care at gunpoint (i.e. subsidies funded through taxation)
is _not_ a right. It is armed robbery by proxy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
437 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
Re: Rule not appearing in masscheck results
Posted by David Jones <dj...@ena.com>.
On 06/10/2018 02:53 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I recently added a test subrule to my sandbox...
>
> (__JS_HTML_OBFU_01, see:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1832875&r2=1833128&diff_format=h
>
> )
>
> ...but it's not showing up in the masscheck results reported on ruleqa
> at all.
>
> The SVN daterevs in ruleqa are advancing normally and are beyond the
> 1833128 commit, so I would expect it to be there. Everything passes lint
> here and masscheck has been running lately so it's not that a stupid
> error in the rule killed masschecks.
>
> Could somebody take a look at their masscheck environment and see
> whether that rule is indeed present?
>
> Any idea why its results wouldn't be showing up on the ruleqa website?
> Is ruleqa perhaps having SVN issues and isn't seeing the new rule even
> though it is present in results?
>
>
I am seeing that rule in the sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf area of
my local masscheck work dir. I grep'ed my ham.log and spam.log for that
rule and got no hits. This is just a guess without looking at the
ruleqa code on the ruleqa server but maybe it won't show up in the
ruleqa web interface if there are no hits from any of the masscheck'ers.
--
David Jones
Re: Rule not appearing in masscheck results
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
Ignore please dumb question
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018, 16:04 Kevin A. McGrail <km...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sandbox on trunk?
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018, 15:53 John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> wrote:
>
>> Folks:
>>
>> I recently added a test subrule to my sandbox...
>>
>> (__JS_HTML_OBFU_01, see:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1832875&r2=1833128&diff_format=h
>> )
>>
>> ...but it's not showing up in the masscheck results reported on ruleqa at
>> all.
>>
>> The SVN daterevs in ruleqa are advancing normally and are beyond the
>> 1833128 commit, so I would expect it to be there. Everything passes lint
>> here and masscheck has been running lately so it's not that a stupid
>> error
>> in the rule killed masschecks.
>>
>> Could somebody take a look at their masscheck environment and see whether
>> that rule is indeed present?
>>
>> Any idea why its results wouldn't be showing up on the ruleqa website? Is
>> ruleqa perhaps having SVN issues and isn't seeing the new rule even
>> though
>> it is present in results?
>>
>>
>> --
>> John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>> jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
>> key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ...we talk about creating "millions of shovel-ready jobs" for a
>> society that doesn't really encourage people to pick up a shovel.
>> -- Mike Rowe, testifying before Congress
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 437 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster
>> (SpaceX)
>>
>
Re: Rule not appearing in masscheck results
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>.
Sandbox on trunk?
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018, 15:53 John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I recently added a test subrule to my sandbox...
>
> (__JS_HTML_OBFU_01, see:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1832875&r2=1833128&diff_format=h
> )
>
> ...but it's not showing up in the masscheck results reported on ruleqa at
> all.
>
> The SVN daterevs in ruleqa are advancing normally and are beyond the
> 1833128 commit, so I would expect it to be there. Everything passes lint
> here and masscheck has been running lately so it's not that a stupid error
> in the rule killed masschecks.
>
> Could somebody take a look at their masscheck environment and see whether
> that rule is indeed present?
>
> Any idea why its results wouldn't be showing up on the ruleqa website? Is
> ruleqa perhaps having SVN issues and isn't seeing the new rule even though
> it is present in results?
>
>
> --
> John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
> jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
> key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ...we talk about creating "millions of shovel-ready jobs" for a
> society that doesn't really encourage people to pick up a shovel.
> -- Mike Rowe, testifying before Congress
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 437 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster
> (SpaceX)
>