You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de> on 2010/12/28 14:24:22 UTC

Service Administration and MUC

On 28.12.10 14:12, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Bernd Fondermann<bf...@brainlounge.de>  wrote:
>> Yep, Psi and Coccinella do support it, both with caveats.
>> Psi fails to display "note's", which indicate when a form contains errors
>> (known open issue in the client) - not very helpful.
>> Coccinella misses the 'reporting' items in the form, but at least recognizes
>> the commands.
>
> Cool, thanks! If we were to provide a web based admin console for
> Vysper, it would make sense to use Service admin for its integration
> with Vysper right? Would also make it usable for other servers I
> guess.

Also, I'd like to use the admin's defined in Service Admin for the admin 
affiliation in MUC.

WDYT?

   Bernd

Re: Service Administration and MUC

Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de> wrote:
> Also, I'd like to use the admin's defined in Service Admin for the admin
> affiliation in MUC.

Makes perfect sense to me.

/niklas