You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "James Taylor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/26 20:34:12 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2920) Incorrect Queries on Multi-tenant tables with WHERE clause containing Row Value Constructor

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2920:
----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 4.8.0

> Incorrect Queries on Multi-tenant tables with WHERE clause containing Row Value Constructor
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2920
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2920
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.7.0
>            Reporter: Brian Esserlieu
>            Assignee: Samarth Jain
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>
> Nothing returns from query against multi-tenant table where the SELECT statement contains a WHERE condition filtering on the multi-tenant field and also contains a row value constructor.
> REPRO:
> Run the statement below and see that no records are returned (the second upserted record should be returned).  Notice that you can either remove the multi-tenancy of the table, or the "pk1 = 1 AND" WHERE condition and the query returns the second record fine, but does not return the second record as it is.
> DROP TABLE IF EXISTS TEST_TABLE;
> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TEST_TABLE (
>     pk1 DECIMAL NOT NULL,
>     pk2 DECIMAL NOT NULL,
>     v1 VARCHAR
>     CONSTRAINT PK PRIMARY KEY 
>     (
>         pk1,
>         pk2
>     )
> ) MULTI_TENANT=true,IMMUTABLE_ROWS=true;
> CREATE INDEX TEST_INDEX ON TEST_TABLE (v1);
> upsert into TEST_TABLE (pk1, pk2, v1) values (1, 1, 'value');
> upsert into TEST_TABLE (pk1, pk2, v1) values (1, 2, 'value');
> SELECT pk1, pk2, v1 
> FROM TEST_TABLE
> WHERE 
> -- notice that if you comment/remove the "pk1=1 AND " statment below the query returns the second record correctly
> pk1 = 1 AND
> (pk1, pk2) > (1, 1)
> ORDER BY PK1, PK2
> LIMIT 2;



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)