You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by John Yu <jo...@scioworks.com> on 2002/09/25 04:13:29 UTC
[Digester] Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] - [Patch]
CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
I haven't got any response/comment on this patch I submitted a week ago.
Some feedback please. >:-)
At 09:56 am 25-09-2002, you wrote:
>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756
>
>[Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>
>john@scioworks.com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Summary|[Patch] |[Patch]
> |CallMethodRule/CallParamRule|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From john@scioworks.com 2002-09-25 01:55 -------
>It seems the fix from Bug#11693 has addressed (partly?) the last issue that
>CallMethodRule didn't work correctly in nested situation.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
John Yu
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [Digester] Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] - [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
Posted by Christopher Lenz <cm...@gmx.de>.
Hi John,
I'd also like to see the functionality you describe in Digester. I
needed to do equivalent changes in my local workspace to meet the
requirements of my use cases, but my personal patch queue against
Digester is still not cleared so ... :-P
Just to add a bit of pressure behind this issue ;-P
John Yu wrote:
>
> I haven't got any response/comment on this patch I submitted a week ago.
> Some feedback please. >:-)
>
> At 09:56 am 25-09-2002, you wrote:
>
>> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
>> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756>.
>> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
>> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>>
>> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756
>>
>> [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>>
>> john@scioworks.com changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Summary|[Patch] |[Patch]
>>
>> |CallMethodRule/CallParamRule|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional Comments From john@scioworks.com 2002-09-25 01:55
>> -------
>> It seems the fix from Bug#11693 has addressed (partly?) the last issue
>> that
>> CallMethodRule didn't work correctly in nested situation.
--
Christopher Lenz
/=/ cmlenz at gmx.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>