You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beehive.apache.org by "Chad Schoettger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/02/07 22:47:05 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (BEEHIVE-558) Controls doc needs discussion of
control state
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Chad Schoettger resolved BEEHIVE-558.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: V.Next
Assignee: Jacob Danner (was: Chad Schoettger)
Updated doc, svn rev 504701
> Controls doc needs discussion of control state
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEEHIVE-558
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-558
> Project: Beehive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: v1m1
> Reporter: Kyle Marvin
> Assigned To: Jacob Danner
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: V.Next
>
>
> The Controls programming model doc could be made better by adding a discussion of state handling for controls if serialized. This would discuss topics such as:
> - how properties state is serialized for the bean
> - the fact that external config/annotations aren't written into local instance state
> - the isTransient attribute of @ControlImplementation (see BEEHIVE-351)
> - the fact that contextual services are never serialized
> - a discussion of XML vs. Java serialization
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.