You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/04 17:51:54 UTC
Defects Need Verification Query is created and please help on these defects
Hi all,
I just created and published one query "DefectsNeedVerification" in
BugZilla, I'd suggest you all take a look for these defects and do the
verification, this way we can clearup more and more bugs in BugZilla,
meanwhile, for those very old resolved defects to see if there are
regression against current AOO 3.4 release to improve the quality. Thanks.
Best regards,
Lily
Re: Defects Need Verification Query is created and please help on
these defects
Posted by Herbert Duerr <hd...@apache.org>.
On 12.06.2012 09:38, Linyi Li wrote:
> Thanks for explanation, Juergen.
> I will focus on the old defects which can be verified on official AOO3.4
> build first. Then to deal with others when the nightly builds for trunk is
> ready.
Nightly builds for trunk are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
Herbert
Re: Defects Need Verification Query is created and please help on
these defects
Posted by Linyi Li <li...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for explanation, Juergen.
I will focus on the old defects which can be verified on official AOO3.4
build first. Then to deal with others when the nightly builds for trunk is
ready.
2012/6/12 Juergen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>
> Am Dienstag, 12. Juni 2012 um 05:17 schrieb Linyi Li:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I planed to do defects verification recently. I have got two questions.
> > 1. Defects in query "
> > DefectsNeedVerificaiton<
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=DefectsNeedVerificaiton&sharer_id=248824
> >"
> > have two status: RESOLVED, VERIFIED. For verification, My understanding
> is
> > to verify defects which are fixed. How to deal with the defects already
> > marked as VERIFIED? To mark it CLOSED?
> >
> >
>
> In the past we verified issues in a cws and cross checked it later in an
> "official" dev/milestone build and closed it afterwards.
> Today I would say we can verify issues in official dev builds or hopefully
> in the future in nightly builds. And cross check and close them in official
> published dev builds.
> But maybe others have a different opinion.
>
> > 2. I found there are some fixed defect, marked as "committed to trunk in
> > revision 1345624". Is there any official build after AOO3.4. And where to
> > get these revision to verity there defects?
> >
> >
>
> No not yet, I would hope that we can use nightly builds for trunk and more
> official builds for 3.4.1 soon
>
> Juergen
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Sorry, originally this note I plan send to ooo-qa mail list... But I do
> > > hope everyone can contribute to defects verification.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Lily
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I just created and published one query "DefectsNeedVerification" in
> > > > BugZilla, I'd suggest you all take a look for these defects and do
> the
> > > > verification, this way we can clearup more and more bugs in BugZilla,
> > > > meanwhile, for those very old resolved defects to see if there are
> > > > regression against current AOO 3.4 release to improve the quality.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Lily
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best wishes.
> >
> > Lynn
>
>
--
Best wishes.
Lynn
Re: Defects Need Verification Query is created and please help
on these defects
Posted by Juergen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
Am Dienstag, 12. Juni 2012 um 05:17 schrieb Linyi Li:
> Hi,
>
> I planed to do defects verification recently. I have got two questions.
> 1. Defects in query "
> DefectsNeedVerificaiton<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=DefectsNeedVerificaiton&sharer_id=248824>"
> have two status: RESOLVED, VERIFIED. For verification, My understanding is
> to verify defects which are fixed. How to deal with the defects already
> marked as VERIFIED? To mark it CLOSED?
>
>
In the past we verified issues in a cws and cross checked it later in an "official" dev/milestone build and closed it afterwards.
Today I would say we can verify issues in official dev builds or hopefully in the future in nightly builds. And cross check and close them in official published dev builds.
But maybe others have a different opinion.
> 2. I found there are some fixed defect, marked as "committed to trunk in
> revision 1345624". Is there any official build after AOO3.4. And where to
> get these revision to verity there defects?
>
>
No not yet, I would hope that we can use nightly builds for trunk and more official builds for 3.4.1 soon
Juergen
>
>
>
> 2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
>
> > Sorry, originally this note I plan send to ooo-qa mail list... But I do
> > hope everyone can contribute to defects verification.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Lily
> >
> >
> > 2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I just created and published one query "DefectsNeedVerification" in
> > > BugZilla, I'd suggest you all take a look for these defects and do the
> > > verification, this way we can clearup more and more bugs in BugZilla,
> > > meanwhile, for those very old resolved defects to see if there are
> > > regression against current AOO 3.4 release to improve the quality.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Lily
>
>
>
> --
> Best wishes.
>
> Lynn
Re: Defects Need Verification Query is created and please help on
these defects
Posted by Linyi Li <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I planed to do defects verification recently. I have got two questions.
1. Defects in query "
DefectsNeedVerificaiton<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=DefectsNeedVerificaiton&sharer_id=248824>"
have two status: RESOLVED, VERIFIED. For verification, My understanding is
to verify defects which are fixed. How to deal with the defects already
marked as VERIFIED? To mark it CLOSED?
2. I found there are some fixed defect, marked as "committed to trunk in
revision 1345624". Is there any official build after AOO3.4. And where to
get these revision to verity there defects?
2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
> Sorry, originally this note I plan send to ooo-qa mail list... But I do
> hope everyone can contribute to defects verification.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lily
>
>
> 2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just created and published one query "DefectsNeedVerification" in
> > BugZilla, I'd suggest you all take a look for these defects and do the
> > verification, this way we can clearup more and more bugs in BugZilla,
> > meanwhile, for those very old resolved defects to see if there are
> > regression against current AOO 3.4 release to improve the quality.
> Thanks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Lily
> >
>
--
Best wishes.
Lynn
Re: Defects Need Verification Query is created and please help on
these defects
Posted by Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, originally this note I plan send to ooo-qa mail list... But I do
hope everyone can contribute to defects verification.
Best regards,
Lily
2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
> Hi all,
>
> I just created and published one query "DefectsNeedVerification" in
> BugZilla, I'd suggest you all take a look for these defects and do the
> verification, this way we can clearup more and more bugs in BugZilla,
> meanwhile, for those very old resolved defects to see if there are
> regression against current AOO 3.4 release to improve the quality. Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lily
>
Re: Defects Need Verification Query is created and please help on
these defects
Posted by Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, originally this note I plan send to ooo-qa mail list... But I do
hope everyone can contribute to defects verification.
Best regards,
Lily
2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <li...@gmail.com>
> Hi all,
>
> I just created and published one query "DefectsNeedVerification" in
> BugZilla, I'd suggest you all take a look for these defects and do the
> verification, this way we can clearup more and more bugs in BugZilla,
> meanwhile, for those very old resolved defects to see if there are
> regression against current AOO 3.4 release to improve the quality. Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lily
>