You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by br...@apache.org on 2013/05/14 10:13:33 UTC

svn commit: r1482249 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

Author: brane
Date: Tue May 14 08:13:32 2013
New Revision: 1482249

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1482249
Log:
* branches/1.8.x/STATUS: Revoke my veto of r1469519 and friends.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS?rev=1482249&r1=1482248&r2=1482249&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Tue May 14 08:13:32 2013
@@ -102,23 +102,19 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: julianfoad
 
-Veto-blocked changes:
-=====================
-
  * r1469519, r1469520, r1481848, r1481870
    Silence compiler warnings, tighten scopes and improve code.
    Justification:
      Clean builds make it more likely to notice real compiler warnings.
    Votes:
      +1: blair (who has nominated brane's commits after his veto was
-                added.  @philip: what do you mean wrong value?
-                @brane: nominating your commits on top of my commits,
-                that way to avoid a merge conflict)
+                added.  @philip: what do you mean wrong value?)
+     +1: brane (for 1.8.1)
      -0: philip (on r1469519, r1469520, no vote on r1481848, 1481870;
                  see dev thread: it's a false alarm, wrong value)
-     -1: brane (superseded by r1481848 and 1481870, respectively,
-                which silence the warnings while also avoiding
-                the negative effects noted by philip)
+
+Veto-blocked changes:
+=====================
 
 Approved changes:
 =================