[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2352) Gremlin Python driver default pool size makes Gremlin keep-alive difficult

["Mark Br...e (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17127360#comment-17127360 ] 

Mark Br...e commented on TINKERPOP-2352:
----------------------------------------

I've started on this, hoping to have a PR ready soon...

> Gremlin Python driver default pool size makes Gremlin keep-alive difficult
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2352
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2352
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: python
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.5, 3.4.5
>         Environment: AWS Lambda, Python 3.7 runtime, AWS Neptune.
> (AWS Lambda functions can remain in memory and thus hold connections open for many minutes between invocations)
>            Reporter: Mark Br...e
>            Priority: Major
>
> I'm working with a Gremlin database that (like many) terminates connections if they don't execute any transactions with a timeout period.  When we want to run a traversal we first check our `GraphTraversalSource` by running `g.V().limit(1).count().next()` and if that raises an exception we know we need to reconnect before running the actual traversal.
> We've been very confused that this hasn't worked as expected: we intermittently see traversals fail with `WebSocketClosed` or other connection-related errors immediately after the "connection test" passes. 
> I've (finally) found the cause of this inconsistency is the default pool size in `gremlin_python.driver.client.Client` being 4.  This means there's no visiblity outside the `Client` of which connection in the pool is tested and/or used, and in fact no way for the application (`GraphTraversalSource`) to run keep-alive type traversals reliably.  Anytime an application passes in a pool size of `None` or a number > 1 there'll be no way to make sure that each and every connection in the pool actually sends keep-alive traversals to the remote, _except_ in the case of a single-threaded application where a tight loop could issue `pool_size` of them.  In that latter case as the application is single-threaded then a `pool_size` above 1 won't provide much benefit.
> I've raised this as a bug because I think a default `pool_size` of 1 would give much more predictable behaviour, and in the specific case of the Python driver is probably more appropriate because Python applications tend to run single-threaded by default, with multi-threading carefully added when performance requires it.  Perhaps it's a wish, but as the behaviour from the default option is quite confusing it feels more like a bug, at least.  If it would help I'm happy to raise a PR with some updated function header comments or maybe updated documentation about multi-threaded / multi-async-loop usage of gremlin-python.
> (This is my first issue here, apologies if it has some fields wrong.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)