You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Leo Neumeyer <le...@gmail.com> on 2011/09/14 22:19:31 UTC
[PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Dear all,
I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
distributed streaming platform written in Java.
Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
Thanks,
Leo Neumeyer
http://s4.io
http://twitter.com/leoneu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Akash Ashok <th...@gmail.com>.
Sounds really interesting. Looking forward to seeing this incubated.
Cheers,
Akash A
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Scott Wilson <
scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2011, at 21:19, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
> > distributed streaming platform written in Java.
> >
> > Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leo Neumeyer
> >
> > http://s4.io
> > http://twitter.com/leoneu
>
>
> This sounds like a really interesting proposal Leo - would it work with
> emerging streaming capabilities for browser such as WebRTC and WebSockets?
> For example, would it work as a processor for streams coming in from a
> browser via WebRTC or HTML5 Device Capture, as well as for pushing streams
> out into <video> elements or to websocket clients?
>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com>.
On 14 Sep 2011, at 21:19, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
>
> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
>
> Thanks,
> Leo Neumeyer
>
> http://s4.io
> http://twitter.com/leoneu
This sounds like a really interesting proposal Leo - would it work with emerging streaming capabilities for browser such as WebRTC and WebSockets? For example, would it work as a processor for streams coming in from a browser via WebRTC or HTML5 Device Capture, as well as for pushing streams out into <video> elements or to websocket clients?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io>.
Thanks, Arun. I'm happy to have you on board!
-Flavio
On Sep 20, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Happy to help mentor S4.
>
> Arun
>
> On Sep 20, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> There are currently only 2 mentors volunteering to help out (Owen and
>> myself), would be great to have 3+ -- any IPMC members out there that
>> could help with the mentoring effort?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>> <vi...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points:
>>>>
>>>> - Monitor Nodes and PEs.
>>>> - Ability to query specific PE instance variables.
>>>> - Add remove nodes.
>>>> - Monitor logs.
>>>> - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node.
>>>> - Load/unload apps.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded
>>> to YARN.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN
>>>> for S4
>>>> cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok
>>>> with you,
>>>> I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an
>>>> issue we
>>>> could consider independently of the project going into incubator.
>>>> Let me
>>>> know if you agree.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Definitely.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
Happy to help mentor S4.
Arun
On Sep 20, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> There are currently only 2 mentors volunteering to help out (Owen and
> myself), would be great to have 3+ -- any IPMC members out there that
> could help with the mentoring effort?
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> <vi...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io> wrote:
>>
>>> To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points:
>>>
>>> - Monitor Nodes and PEs.
>>> - Ability to query specific PE instance variables.
>>> - Add remove nodes.
>>> - Monitor logs.
>>> - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node.
>>> - Load/unload apps.
>>>
>>
>>
>> It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded to YARN.
>>
>>
>>
>>> In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4
>>> cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you,
>>> I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we
>>> could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me
>>> know if you agree.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Definitely.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> +Vinod
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
There are currently only 2 mentors volunteering to help out (Owen and
myself), would be great to have 3+ -- any IPMC members out there that
could help with the mentoring effort?
Regards,
Patrick
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
<vi...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io> wrote:
>
>> To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points:
>>
>> - Monitor Nodes and PEs.
>> - Ability to query specific PE instance variables.
>> - Add remove nodes.
>> - Monitor logs.
>> - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node.
>> - Load/unload apps.
>>
>
>
> It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded to YARN.
>
>
>
>> In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4
>> cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you,
>> I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we
>> could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me
>> know if you agree.
>>
>
>
> Definitely.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io> wrote:
> To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points:
>
> - Monitor Nodes and PEs.
> - Ability to query specific PE instance variables.
> - Add remove nodes.
> - Monitor logs.
> - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node.
> - Load/unload apps.
>
It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded to YARN.
> In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4
> cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you,
> I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we
> could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me
> know if you agree.
>
Definitely.
Thanks,
+Vinod
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io>.
Hi Vinod, Thanks for the support and comments. See my more comments
below:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
> Great addition to Apache, +1.
>
> Some comments on the proposal:
> - In the "Initial Goals" section, you referred to "Add a cluster
> management
> system". Not sure of what it entirely means, but if it is what I
> think it
> is, the new resource-management layer in Hadoop (YARN/ JIRA issue
> MAPREDUCE-279) can be leveraged for this. YARN is going to be
> available in
> Hadoop 0.23 release. Willing to help in this regard in any way
> possible if
> you think it makes sense for S4, can have a separate discussion too.
To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points:
- Monitor Nodes and PEs.
- Ability to query specific PE instance variables.
- Add remove nodes.
- Monitor logs.
- Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node.
- Load/unload apps.
In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for
S4 cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok
with you, I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it
is an issue we could consider independently of the project going into
incubator. Let me know if you agree.
> - You may want to capture the discussion about Hdaoop/Flume/Kafka in
> the
> "Relationships with Other Apache Projects" section.
I have added a summary to the proposal, thanks for pointing it out.
> - Seen elsewhere that proposals list down the list of companies of the
> initial set of committers (section "Homogeneous Developers").
>
I have also added a list here.
-Flavio
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Leo Neumeyer
> <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4
>> is a
>> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
>>
>> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leo Neumeyer
>>
>> http://s4.io
>> http://twitter.com/leoneu
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>.
Great addition to Apache, +1.
Some comments on the proposal:
- In the "Initial Goals" section, you referred to "Add a cluster management
system". Not sure of what it entirely means, but if it is what I think it
is, the new resource-management layer in Hadoop (YARN/ JIRA issue
MAPREDUCE-279) can be leveraged for this. YARN is going to be available in
Hadoop 0.23 release. Willing to help in this regard in any way possible if
you think it makes sense for S4, can have a separate discussion too.
- You may want to capture the discussion about Hdaoop/Flume/Kafka in the
"Relationships with Other Apache Projects" section.
- Seen elsewhere that proposals list down the list of companies of the
initial set of committers (section "Homogeneous Developers").
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Leo Neumeyer <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
>
> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
>
> Thanks,
> Leo Neumeyer
>
> http://s4.io
> http://twitter.com/leoneu
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Leo Neumeyer <le...@gmail.com>.
Phil and all,
Great discussion and so happy you want to join the team. No need to apologize !!
My feeling is that if someone wants to join the project as a contributor and has technical merit he or she will become a committer pretty quickly. I think that having a minimal protocol is useful to make sure people get to know each other and the project. In fact, the current policy seems good to me: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html I love the DO-ocracy concept and seems to be the best way to become a committer.
So I propose that those who are interested and can volunteer some time, start thinking on how to contribute. If the project is accepted we will discuss the details in the mailing list.
Thanks again!
-leo
On Sep 15, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io> wrote:
>>
>> I have read the guide to participation:
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html
>>
>> and I understand from there that people shouldn't simply jump in as an
>> initial committer without a short introduction and without acknowledgment
>> from the proposer.
>
> Since I was one of those people, let me issue a "mea culpa" here. Despite
> having read the participation guidelines (more than once even) I apparently
> slipped into a bit of a conditioned response, from observed behavior. For
> better or worse, it has become not uncommon (in my experience) to see
> people simply "jump in" and add themselves. In retrospect, yes, it probably
> is a bit rude, and I apologize for my part in this.
>
> I suppose t's just what Roy said in 2006: everybody
> saw a certain process appearing to happen, assumed it was policy and
> didn't give it any further thought. Guess I'm guilty of that.
>
>
>> Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial set of
>> committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed to get
>> the current code to this stage, and we were not expecting arbitrary requests
>> to join the initial list of committers.
>
> While "jumping in" is - as we've already established - in bad taste, I
> *think* that
> (most|any|some) projects entering incubation should expect such requests.
> Part of the focus of the incubator, as I've understood it, is to
> promote sufficient
> diversity in the community and the team, that no one "block" of people can kill
> the project by dropping out or whatever. Having new initial
> committers that have
> no outstanding connection to the project is one way to achieve that.
> In this regard, the
> incubation period is radically different from other times in the
> project lifecycle.
> Or, again, that has been my understanding.
>
> Then again, maybe it only appears that way because some projects make
> it a point to
> appeal to people *to* join in as initial committers.
>
>> Of course, as a potential Apache
>> project (now potentially incubator, but looking forward to being TLP in the
>> future), we are ready to work towards building a community, which includes
>> granting the status of committer to contributors. However, we'd like new
>> committers to earn their status by showing commitment to the community and
>> demonstrating technical merit.
>
> Absolutely, and entering the incubator is the only time - AFAIK - that projects
> here tend to take a slightly different stance. It's all about seeding
> the initial pool
> before the project gets underway. That said, I'm not sure projects
> are required
> to accept an additional initial committers beyond what the proposer suggests.
>
>
> For my own part, I'll just say that I'm excited about S4, very happy
> to volunteer to help, and
> if you guys want me, I'm in. If not, take me off the list and it'll
> all be cool. FSM knows, I have
> plenty of stuff to keep me occupied already. ;-)
>
> As far as introduction goes... Well, I founded Fogbeam Labs, started
> the ScrewPile project to
> develop an OSS suite of Enterprise Knowledge Management software.
> I've been a professional
> software engineer for the past 12-13 years, working mostly in Java,
> but some C, C++, Python
> and Groovy as well. If anyone wants to know more about me, just ask,
> or see: https://plus.google.com/u/1/114301088526097505896/about
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Phil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io>.
Hi Phillip, Thanks for your feedback, see some more comments below:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>
>
>> Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial
>> set of
>> committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed
>> to get
>> the current code to this stage, and we were not expecting arbitrary
>> requests
>> to join the initial list of committers.
>
> Part of the focus of the incubator, as I've understood it, is to
> promote sufficient
> diversity in the community and the team, that no one "block" of
> people can kill
> the project by dropping out or whatever. Having new initial
> committers that have
> no outstanding connection to the project is one way to achieve that.
> In this regard, the
> incubation period is radically different from other times in the
> project lifecycle.
> Or, again, that has been my understanding.
>
I tend to agree with this observation that it is important to increase
diversity when the initial group is too homogeneous. However, I don't
see this risk with the group we proposed originally, we are coming
from different companies, and our interests converge to S4, but
overall I would say that our motivations are pretty different.
> Then again, maybe it only appears that way because some projects make
> it a point to
> appeal to people *to* join in as initial committers.
>
>> Of course, as a potential Apache
>> project (now potentially incubator, but looking forward to being
>> TLP in the
>> future), we are ready to work towards building a community, which
>> includes
>> granting the status of committer to contributors. However, we'd
>> like new
>> committers to earn their status by showing commitment to the
>> community and
>> demonstrating technical merit.
>
> Absolutely, and entering the incubator is the only time - AFAIK -
> that projects
> here tend to take a slightly different stance. It's all about seeding
> the initial pool
> before the project gets underway. That said, I'm not sure projects
> are required
> to accept an additional initial committers beyond what the proposer
> suggests.
>
To emphasize, just in the case it was not extra clear in the previous
message, it is not that we don't want new committers, but our
preference, assuming it doesn't go against the principles stated by
the community, is to grant committership status once we get to work a
little longer together.
>
> For my own part, I'll just say that I'm excited about S4, very happy
> to volunteer to help, and
> if you guys want me, I'm in. If not, take me off the list and it'll
> all be cool. FSM knows, I have
> plenty of stuff to keep me occupied already. ;-)
>
I'm sure you're busy and have other things to do, but that was not the
point. We want to get all help we can to make sure S4 succeeds in
building a strong community. We just feel that committership is a
separate issue and should be earned.
> As far as introduction goes... Well, I founded Fogbeam Labs, started
> the ScrewPile project to
> develop an OSS suite of Enterprise Knowledge Management software.
> I've been a professional
> software engineer for the past 12-13 years, working mostly in Java,
> but some C, C++, Python
> and Groovy as well. If anyone wants to know more about me, just ask,
> or see: https://plus.google.com/u/1/114301088526097505896/about
>
Thanks again, Phillip. We are looking forward to working with you, so
please consider contributing independent of the committership issue.
Cheers,
-Flavio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Phillip Rhodes <mo...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io> wrote:
>
> I have read the guide to participation:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html
>
> and I understand from there that people shouldn't simply jump in as an
> initial committer without a short introduction and without acknowledgment
> from the proposer.
Since I was one of those people, let me issue a "mea culpa" here. Despite
having read the participation guidelines (more than once even) I apparently
slipped into a bit of a conditioned response, from observed behavior. For
better or worse, it has become not uncommon (in my experience) to see
people simply "jump in" and add themselves. In retrospect, yes, it probably
is a bit rude, and I apologize for my part in this.
I suppose t's just what Roy said in 2006: everybody
saw a certain process appearing to happen, assumed it was policy and
didn't give it any further thought. Guess I'm guilty of that.
> Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial set of
> committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed to get
> the current code to this stage, and we were not expecting arbitrary requests
> to join the initial list of committers.
While "jumping in" is - as we've already established - in bad taste, I
*think* that
(most|any|some) projects entering incubation should expect such requests.
Part of the focus of the incubator, as I've understood it, is to
promote sufficient
diversity in the community and the team, that no one "block" of people can kill
the project by dropping out or whatever. Having new initial
committers that have
no outstanding connection to the project is one way to achieve that.
In this regard, the
incubation period is radically different from other times in the
project lifecycle.
Or, again, that has been my understanding.
Then again, maybe it only appears that way because some projects make
it a point to
appeal to people *to* join in as initial committers.
> Of course, as a potential Apache
> project (now potentially incubator, but looking forward to being TLP in the
> future), we are ready to work towards building a community, which includes
> granting the status of committer to contributors. However, we'd like new
> committers to earn their status by showing commitment to the community and
> demonstrating technical merit.
Absolutely, and entering the incubator is the only time - AFAIK - that projects
here tend to take a slightly different stance. It's all about seeding
the initial pool
before the project gets underway. That said, I'm not sure projects
are required
to accept an additional initial committers beyond what the proposer suggests.
For my own part, I'll just say that I'm excited about S4, very happy
to volunteer to help, and
if you guys want me, I'm in. If not, take me off the list and it'll
all be cool. FSM knows, I have
plenty of stuff to keep me occupied already. ;-)
As far as introduction goes... Well, I founded Fogbeam Labs, started
the ScrewPile project to
develop an OSS suite of Enterprise Knowledge Management software.
I've been a professional
software engineer for the past 12-13 years, working mostly in Java,
but some C, C++, Python
and Groovy as well. If anyone wants to know more about me, just ask,
or see: https://plus.google.com/u/1/114301088526097505896/about
Cheers,
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@s4.io>.
Hi everyone, To introduce myself, I'm a ZooKeeper committer and PMC
member. I'm used to the process of selecting committers for ZooKeeper,
but I'm new to the incubator process, so I would appreciate if the
community could shed some light here.
I have read the guide to participation:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html
and I understand from there that people shouldn't simply jump in as an
initial committer without a short introduction and without
acknowledgment from the proposer. Thanks to the ones who followed the
protocol and introduced themselves.
Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial
set of committers would comprise the people who have initially
contributed to get the current code to this stage, and we were not
expecting arbitrary requests to join the initial list of committers.
Of course, as a potential Apache project (now potentially incubator,
but looking forward to being TLP in the future), we are ready to work
towards building a community, which includes granting the status of
committer to contributors. However, we'd like new committers to earn
their status by showing commitment to the community and demonstrating
technical merit.
We understand that it is important to have other people who are
experienced with ASF to mentor the project, and we don't want to drive
these people away or anyone else who is willing to contribute.
Committership and mentorship sound like different issues, though, and
we would like committership in general (ASF experienced or not) to be
earned.
I was also checking some other threads that discuss the issue, and I
believe my message reflects some of the points in previous threads, so
I'm linking them here:
http://markmail.org/message/hfy2clgc3ddwfjnz
http://markmail.org/message/nkfugts33sw37gwf
What exactly is expected and how should we proceed?
Thanks,
-Flavio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Phillip Rhodes <mo...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
>
> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
>
Awesome! I'm very happy to see S4 joining Apache, and am volunteering
to help out. I've added myself to the "initial committers" list on
the proposal wiki.
Definitely looking forward to this.
Cheers,
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by adam wojtuniak <ad...@gmail.com>.
Hi Leo,
Looks very interesting.
I am very interested to join the project and help with implementation.
If you are interested you can add me to initial committers list.
In telecommunication (Ericsson) we are very interested in using distributed
streaming so is good
idea to start contributing for this project as well.
I am a committer (awojtuniak) of Apache Felix and Aries.
Cheers,
Adam Wojtuniak
awojtuniak@apache.org
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> I am also very much interested .. great to have this in Apache.
>
> --Srinath
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > We are quite interested in using and helping contribute to S4 as a
> > more pure streaming events processing platform.
> >
> > If there are no objections I would like to add myself to the initial
> > list of committers.
> >
> > My primary interest is in social platform and distributed systems.
> > Currently PMC in Apache Shindig, and contributing in other Apache
> projects.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
> >> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
> >>
> >> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Leo Neumeyer
> >>
> >> http://s4.io
> >> http://twitter.com/leoneu
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ============================
> WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com
> Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Leo,
I am also very much interested .. great to have this in Apache.
--Srinath
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> We are quite interested in using and helping contribute to S4 as a
> more pure streaming events processing platform.
>
> If there are no objections I would like to add myself to the initial
> list of committers.
>
> My primary interest is in social platform and distributed systems.
> Currently PMC in Apache Shindig, and contributing in other Apache projects.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
>> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
>>
>> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leo Neumeyer
>>
>> http://s4.io
>> http://twitter.com/leoneu
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
============================
WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com
Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Leo,
We are quite interested in using and helping contribute to S4 as a
more pure streaming events processing platform.
If there are no objections I would like to add myself to the initial
list of committers.
My primary interest is in social platform and distributed systems.
Currently PMC in Apache Shindig, and contributing in other Apache projects.
- Henry
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a
> distributed streaming platform written in Java.
>
> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal
>
> Thanks,
> Leo Neumeyer
>
> http://s4.io
> http://twitter.com/leoneu
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org