You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by "Barnett, James" <Ja...@Aspect.com> on 2005/12/05 21:04:33 UTC
[scxml] removing superstep, etc.
I've developed a version of SCXML that matches the spec's semantics more
closely (no superstep, single event queue, internal and external events
treated identically, etc.) I am not going to check it in right away,
however, for two reasons:
1. I couldn't keep the changes local to the semantics component.
In particular I had to change SCXMLExecutor significantly (including
making it support the Runnable interface.)
2. This is my first time programming in Java so I'm sure I messed
things up.
Maybe we could set up a phone call to discuss how to merge the changes
without breaking existing applications. We also need to discuss how to
make other changes needed to get in synch with the upcoming release of
the spec. And in any case, I would like someone to review my code
before it gets checked in.
- Jim
Re: [scxml] removing superstep, etc.
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 12/5/05, Barnett, James <Ja...@aspect.com> wrote:
> I've developed a version of SCXML that matches the spec's semantics more
> closely (no superstep, single event queue, internal and external events
> treated identically, etc.)
<snip/>
This is great, thanks.
> I am not going to check it in right away,
> however, for two reasons:
>
> 1. I couldn't keep the changes local to the semantics component.
> In particular I had to change SCXMLExecutor significantly (including
> making it support the Runnable interface.)
> 2. This is my first time programming in Java so I'm sure I messed
> things up.
>
>
> Maybe we could set up a phone call to discuss how to merge the changes
> without breaking existing applications. We also need to discuss how to
> make other changes needed to get in synch with the upcoming release of
> the spec. And in any case, I would like someone to review my code
> before it gets checked in.
>
<snap/>
When you get a chance, please attach a patch to a bugzilla ticket, and
we'll be glad to take a look at it.
Bugzilla is here [1].
Some information related to filing tickets in bugzilla, specific to
SCXML, is here [2].
-Rahul
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
[2] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/scxml/issue-tracking.html
>
>
> - Jim
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org