You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> on 2021/03/01 12:32:41 UTC
Re: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to
MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
Hi Chris,
this commit: "- Updated the config.xmls to refer to the SWCs with the
updated Ant-names"
(sha: 70a06fb43714ddc937b985b44595e297b5cd6376)
has the changes I refer. There's some changes in pom.xml examples, but I
think since are poms and not distribution are ok
El dom, 28 feb 2021 a las 21:10, Christofer Dutz (<ch...@c-ware.de>)
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I can't even recall having changed anything in any of the pom.xml files.
> I'm currently working on the deistribution.
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 20:19
> An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Betreff: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to
> MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> this change in pom.xml:
>
>
> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.version}-js.swc:defaults.css;
>
> to this:
>
> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css;
>
> is not working right.
>
> If I build todomvc-jewel-crux (for example) with the later, I get MXRoyale
> styles mixed in the example.
>
> For example the main title gets bigger and bolder.
>
> If I return to the older, it works ok.
>
> I'm building with Maven, so it seems ok to left as before, while in
> asconfigc, I think it will be ok not having version in the name since SDK
> doesn't have
>
> make that sense?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira
AW: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to
MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Sure
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 16:42
An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
Hi Chris,
ok, just want to confirm with you. I think this is not related to distro, so I can put it back, unless you say is not ok to do it, so don't need to worry about it and continue with your task
thanks
El lun, 1 mar 2021 a las 13:36, Christofer Dutz (<ch...@c-ware.de>)
escribió:
> Aaahh ... ok .. that one.
>
> I renamed the artifacts in the distribution ... ok ... I think right
> now it perhaps doesn't make much sense to figgure out these little
> details and perhaps I should concentrate on the big refactoring. We
> can then put out the little fires there.
>
> You agree?
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 13:33
> An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to
> refer to MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> this commit: "- Updated the config.xmls to refer to the SWCs with the
> updated Ant-names"
>
> (sha: 70a06fb43714ddc937b985b44595e297b5cd6376)
>
> has the changes I refer. There's some changes in pom.xml examples, but
> I think since are poms and not distribution are ok
>
>
>
> El dom, 28 feb 2021 a las 21:10, Christofer Dutz (<
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > I can't even recall having changed anything in any of the pom.xml files.
> > I'm currently working on the deistribution.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 20:19
> > An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> > Betreff: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to
> > refer to MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > this change in pom.xml:
> >
> >
> > -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.ver
> > si
> > on}-js.swc:defaults.css;
> >
> > to this:
> >
> > -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css;
> >
> > is not working right.
> >
> > If I build todomvc-jewel-crux (for example) with the later, I get
> > MXRoyale styles mixed in the example.
> >
> > For example the main title gets bigger and bolder.
> >
> > If I return to the older, it works ok.
> >
> > I'm building with Maven, so it seems ok to left as before, while in
> > asconfigc, I think it will be ok not having version in the name
> > since SDK doesn't have
> >
> > make that sense?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to
MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Chris,
ok, just want to confirm with you. I think this is not related to distro,
so I can put it back, unless you say is not ok to do it, so don't need to
worry about it and continue with your task
thanks
El lun, 1 mar 2021 a las 13:36, Christofer Dutz (<ch...@c-ware.de>)
escribió:
> Aaahh ... ok .. that one.
>
> I renamed the artifacts in the distribution ... ok ... I think right now
> it perhaps doesn't make much sense to figgure out these little details and
> perhaps I should concentrate on the big refactoring. We can then put out
> the little fires there.
>
> You agree?
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 13:33
> An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to
> refer to MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> this commit: "- Updated the config.xmls to refer to the SWCs with the
> updated Ant-names"
>
> (sha: 70a06fb43714ddc937b985b44595e297b5cd6376)
>
> has the changes I refer. There's some changes in pom.xml examples, but I
> think since are poms and not distribution are ok
>
>
>
> El dom, 28 feb 2021 a las 21:10, Christofer Dutz (<
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > I can't even recall having changed anything in any of the pom.xml files.
> > I'm currently working on the deistribution.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 20:19
> > An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> > Betreff: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to
> > refer to MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > this change in pom.xml:
> >
> >
> > -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.versi
> > on}-js.swc:defaults.css;
> >
> > to this:
> >
> > -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css;
> >
> > is not working right.
> >
> > If I build todomvc-jewel-crux (for example) with the later, I get
> > MXRoyale styles mixed in the example.
> >
> > For example the main title gets bigger and bolder.
> >
> > If I return to the older, it works ok.
> >
> > I'm building with Maven, so it seems ok to left as before, while in
> > asconfigc, I think it will be ok not having version in the name since
> > SDK doesn't have
> >
> > make that sense?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira
AW: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to
MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Aaahh ... ok .. that one.
I renamed the artifacts in the distribution ... ok ... I think right now it perhaps doesn't make much sense to figgure out these little details and perhaps I should concentrate on the big refactoring. We can then put out the little fires there.
You agree?
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 13:33
An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
Hi Chris,
this commit: "- Updated the config.xmls to refer to the SWCs with the updated Ant-names"
(sha: 70a06fb43714ddc937b985b44595e297b5cd6376)
has the changes I refer. There's some changes in pom.xml examples, but I think since are poms and not distribution are ok
El dom, 28 feb 2021 a las 21:10, Christofer Dutz (<ch...@c-ware.de>)
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I can't even recall having changed anything in any of the pom.xml files.
> I'm currently working on the deistribution.
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 20:19
> An: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Betreff: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to
> refer to MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> this change in pom.xml:
>
>
> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.versi
> on}-js.swc:defaults.css;
>
> to this:
>
> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css;
>
> is not working right.
>
> If I build todomvc-jewel-crux (for example) with the later, I get
> MXRoyale styles mixed in the example.
>
> For example the main title gets bigger and bolder.
>
> If I return to the older, it works ok.
>
> I'm building with Maven, so it seems ok to left as before, while in
> asconfigc, I think it will be ok not having version in the name since
> SDK doesn't have
>
> make that sense?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira