RE: Does Doc/Literal allows users to directly work with language constructs (classes, structures etc..)?

["Agarwal, Naresh" <na...@informatica.com>]

Hi Srinivas,

thanks for the reply.

Doc/Literal support in Axis allows users to directly work with constructs (classes, structures etc..) available
in languages. But in general can we do this in case of Doc/Literal? I believe that the fundamental difference between
RPC/Encoded and Doc/Literal is that in case of RPC/Encoded, users can directly work with constructs (classes, structures etc..) available in languages. 

However, we cann't do this in Doc/Literal since, it is the service implementation, who pareses the SOAP message and interpret it.

Does doc/literal support in other SOAP implementation also allows this? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:06 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does Doc/Literal allows users to directly work with
language constructs (classes, structures etc..)?


Yes, Doc/Literal support in Axis can do the same.

--- "Agarwal, Naresh" <na...@informatica.com> wrote:
> Hi
>  
> RPC/Encoded allows users to directly work with constructs (classes, structures etc..) available
> in languages. 
> Does Doc/Literal allows the same?
>  
> AFAIK, it does not, as in case of Doc/Literal, it is responsibility of client and the service to
> interpret the SOAP message.
>  
> thanks
> Naresh Agarwal
> 


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com