You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@archiva.apache.org by Eric Fetzer <er...@gmail.com> on 2022/03/01 20:49:52 UTC

Archiva Upgrade

Hi all!  I'm upgrading archiva 2.2.4 to 2.2.7 for the log4j vulnerability.
I'm going from the document at:

https://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.2.7/adminguide/upgrade.html

This doc says that I should copy forward the data/repositories folder, but
I don't have that folder.  My repositories folder is at the same level as
data.  Data only has databases, jcr, and remotes in it.

Should I copy forward the repositories folder where it is now to the 2.7
version or put it under data there?

Thanks,
Eric

Re: Archiva Upgrade

Posted by Thad Humphries <th...@gmail.com>.
Eric,

I also have data and repositories on the same level. My install--and it's
been a while--is Stanalone following the instructions for "Separating the
base from the installation" (
https://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.2.7/adminguide/standalone.html). So
Archiva is installed at /opt/apache-archiva and the rest--what the link
above calls 'data'--is at /u3/archiva, containing:

$ ls -F /u3/archiva
conf/  data/  groups/  logs/  nohup.out  repositories/  temp/

Does your setup look similar? So I think you can just update
/opt/apache-archiva. That's similar to how I install Tomcat--binaries one
place, config and apps in another.


On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:50 PM Eric Fetzer <er...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all!  I'm upgrading archiva 2.2.4 to 2.2.7 for the log4j vulnerability.
> I'm going from the document at:
>
> https://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.2.7/adminguide/upgrade.html
>
> This doc says that I should copy forward the data/repositories folder, but
> I don't have that folder.  My repositories folder is at the same level as
> data.  Data only has databases, jcr, and remotes in it.
>
> Should I copy forward the repositories folder where it is now to the 2.7
> version or put it under data there?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>


-- 
"Hell hath no limits, nor is circumscrib'd In one self-place; but where we
are is hell, And where hell is, there must we ever be" --Christopher
Marlowe, *Doctor Faustus* (v. 111-13)

RE: Archiva Upgrade

Posted by Jason Grammenos <ja...@agilitypr.com.INVALID>.
No the group still exists, but there is basically no activity. You may have to wait awhile for your question to get answered. I think you question is the first activity on the list in many months.

Jason Grammenos | Operations and Infrastructure Analyst
Pronouns: he/him
P: 613.232.7797 x1131
Toll-free: 866.545.3745 x1131
jason.grammenos@agilitypr.com
agilitypr.com
Learn new PR tips from our free resources.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Fetzer <er...@gmail.com> 
Sent: March 3, 2022 12:53 PM
To: users@archiva.apache.org
Subject: Re: Archiva Upgrade

Is this user group no longer maintained?

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 1:49 PM Eric Fetzer <er...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all!  I'm upgrading archiva 2.2.4 to 2.2.7 for the log4j 
> vulnerability.  I'm going from the document at:
>
> https://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.2.7/adminguide/upgrade.html
>
> This doc says that I should copy forward the data/repositories folder, 
> but I don't have that folder.  My repositories folder is at the same 
> level as data.  Data only has databases, jcr, and remotes in it.
>
> Should I copy forward the repositories folder where it is now to the 
> 2.7 version or put it under data there?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>

Re: Archiva Upgrade

Posted by Eric Fetzer <er...@gmail.com>.
Is this user group no longer maintained?

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 1:49 PM Eric Fetzer <er...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all!  I'm upgrading archiva 2.2.4 to 2.2.7 for the log4j
> vulnerability.  I'm going from the document at:
>
> https://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.2.7/adminguide/upgrade.html
>
> This doc says that I should copy forward the data/repositories folder, but
> I don't have that folder.  My repositories folder is at the same level as
> data.  Data only has databases, jcr, and remotes in it.
>
> Should I copy forward the repositories folder where it is now to the 2.7
> version or put it under data there?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>