You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@thrift.apache.org by Michael Greene <mi...@gmail.com> on 2009/07/08 08:13:00 UTC
July Board Report Due
The board report looks like it is due today. Since the last one, we
had an rc1 and rc2, the second of which was well-received but I'm not
sure where we are in the process. From a coding and discussion
perspective, progress was made on release artifacts, a non-blocking
C++ server, more language support for the compact protocol, a
fledgling AS3 generator, an improved Java configuration/install
process, dependency removal for the compiler to ease installation on
more platforms, evaluating Thrift's performance against other
serialization options, and general bug-fixing.
What else do we have?
Michael
RE: July Board Report Due
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
It'd be great to answer:
* Three next issues to work on before graduation
* any community changes, e.g. new committers/PPMC members
* any legal issues (statement of "no legal issues at this time" is
always good.
Also, clarify the point that we're working towards putting the RC2
before the incubator PMC - that shows we understand the next step.
Oh, and when we do actually put a release before the Incubator PMC, I'll
try to be more attentive than I was for the recent Shindig release.
Upayavira
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 10:16 -0700, Mark Slee wrote:
> I've updated the wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2009
>
> Thanks for summarizing, Michael, basically took the points from your email verbatim. Anyone should feel free to edit/update if something has been missed.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chad Walters [mailto:Chad.Walters@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:57 AM
> To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: July Board Report Due
>
>
> We really need to finalize the 0.1 release. It's an important step in the incubation process. More importantly, the first release certifies that all the IP is properly under the Apache license.
>
> We need to get some votes recorded on 0.1RC2, especially from the committers, I believe. Anyone?
>
> Chad
>
> On 7/8/09 7:48 AM, "Bryan Duxbury" <br...@rapleaf.com> wrote:
>
> I think that sums it up. The release is sort of frozen due to general
> lack of initiative, I think.
>
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Michael Greene wrote:
>
> > The board report looks like it is due today. Since the last one, we
> > had an rc1 and rc2, the second of which was well-received but I'm not
> > sure where we are in the process. From a coding and discussion
> > perspective, progress was made on release artifacts, a non-blocking
> > C++ server, more language support for the compact protocol, a
> > fledgling AS3 generator, an improved Java configuration/install
> > process, dependency removal for the compiler to ease installation on
> > more platforms, evaluating Thrift's performance against other
> > serialization options, and general bug-fixing.
> >
> > What else do we have?
> >
> > Michael
>
>
RE: July Board Report Due
Posted by Mark Slee <ms...@facebook.com>.
I've updated the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2009
Thanks for summarizing, Michael, basically took the points from your email verbatim. Anyone should feel free to edit/update if something has been missed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chad Walters [mailto:Chad.Walters@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:57 AM
To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: July Board Report Due
We really need to finalize the 0.1 release. It's an important step in the incubation process. More importantly, the first release certifies that all the IP is properly under the Apache license.
We need to get some votes recorded on 0.1RC2, especially from the committers, I believe. Anyone?
Chad
On 7/8/09 7:48 AM, "Bryan Duxbury" <br...@rapleaf.com> wrote:
I think that sums it up. The release is sort of frozen due to general
lack of initiative, I think.
On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Michael Greene wrote:
> The board report looks like it is due today. Since the last one, we
> had an rc1 and rc2, the second of which was well-received but I'm not
> sure where we are in the process. From a coding and discussion
> perspective, progress was made on release artifacts, a non-blocking
> C++ server, more language support for the compact protocol, a
> fledgling AS3 generator, an improved Java configuration/install
> process, dependency removal for the compiler to ease installation on
> more platforms, evaluating Thrift's performance against other
> serialization options, and general bug-fixing.
>
> What else do we have?
>
> Michael
Re: July Board Report Due
Posted by Chad Walters <Ch...@microsoft.com>.
We really need to finalize the 0.1 release. It's an important step in the incubation process. More importantly, the first release certifies that all the IP is properly under the Apache license.
We need to get some votes recorded on 0.1RC2, especially from the committers, I believe. Anyone?
Chad
On 7/8/09 7:48 AM, "Bryan Duxbury" <br...@rapleaf.com> wrote:
I think that sums it up. The release is sort of frozen due to general
lack of initiative, I think.
On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Michael Greene wrote:
> The board report looks like it is due today. Since the last one, we
> had an rc1 and rc2, the second of which was well-received but I'm not
> sure where we are in the process. From a coding and discussion
> perspective, progress was made on release artifacts, a non-blocking
> C++ server, more language support for the compact protocol, a
> fledgling AS3 generator, an improved Java configuration/install
> process, dependency removal for the compiler to ease installation on
> more platforms, evaluating Thrift's performance against other
> serialization options, and general bug-fixing.
>
> What else do we have?
>
> Michael
Re: July Board Report Due
Posted by Bryan Duxbury <br...@rapleaf.com>.
I think that sums it up. The release is sort of frozen due to general
lack of initiative, I think.
On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Michael Greene wrote:
> The board report looks like it is due today. Since the last one, we
> had an rc1 and rc2, the second of which was well-received but I'm not
> sure where we are in the process. From a coding and discussion
> perspective, progress was made on release artifacts, a non-blocking
> C++ server, more language support for the compact protocol, a
> fledgling AS3 generator, an improved Java configuration/install
> process, dependency removal for the compiler to ease installation on
> more platforms, evaluating Thrift's performance against other
> serialization options, and general bug-fixing.
>
> What else do we have?
>
> Michael