You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org> on 2016/09/03 15:56:23 UTC
Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Hi Guys,
let me kick off the Dust of this Thread :-)
Somehow the discussion on this stopped. I would really like to use one of these logos in my Presentation. I still think we should use one of the colored ones. Even if green is the most friendly one, somehow JS for me is sort of "red". I just did a short picture search, and that sort of looks as if most JS logos are Yellow to Orange.
What do you think? I really like the disgns Deepak used in his last post:
http://snag.gy/544ut.jpg
Would it be ok for me to use one of them in my slides?
Chris
On 2016-02-15 14:47 (+0200), Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> great stuff ... it's getting better and better ... even if I can't really say, which color I like most, but definitely one of the colors.
> Probably the red or orange one stands out the most, but the green one is really friendly ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2016 09:45
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: FlexJS Logo?
>
> Tried to pick up 'J' from existing 'F' to maintain the text design flow.
> Some of the variations:
>
> http://snag.gy/544ut.jpg
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree with Alex that everything on the same baseline looks better. The
> > subscript adds negative space in the middle that makes the eye jump all
> > over the place.
> >
> > I would experiment with making the "apache" text larger so that it starts
> > closer to the top of the l, like the Apache Flex logo without the JS.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Nick. If it were up to me, I would choose the all-black
> > > all-on-the-same-baseline (flexjs-logo-baseline), but I am definitely less
> > > hip than you so I will defer to others.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 2/12/16, 9:12 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski"
> > > <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Here are some of the deviations you asked for :
> > > >
> > >
> > https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=ED8E53EA91913A03!3221&authkey=!ADQdx
> > > >D68LZwx-2s&ithint=folder%2c
> > > >
> > > >I've been told that the JS as a subscript is the new hipster thing to
> > do,
> > > >but I don't really know. I'm not an artist or a graphic designer -- I
> > > >just
> > > >know how to use Illustrator and Photoshop.
> > > >
> > > >-Nick
> > > >
> > > >On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Interesting. I don't want to start a huge discussion, but can you
> > make
> > > >>a
> > > >> version that has the JS on the same baseline? Or is a subscript "JS"
> > > >>the
> > > >> new hip trend?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> -Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2/12/16, 6:33 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski"
> > > >> <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Lets try this another way :
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=ED8E53EA91913A03!3217&authkey=!AM33
> > > >>B
> > > >> >WbIWmdOkI4&ithint=folder%2c
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Christofer Dutz
> > > >> ><ch...@c-ware.de>
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Hmmm ... that didn't seem to work ... I only got an empty
> > > >>"error-image"
> > > >> >>...
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> ________________________________
> > > >> >> Von: Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 17:31
> > > >> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > >> >> Betreff: Re: FlexJS Logo?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Here is a quick stab at a FlexJS logo. I don't have the original
> > > >>font
> > > >> >> they used in the logo (they said it was Calibri, which is what I
> > used
> > > >> >>here,
> > > >> >> but it looks like there were some embellishments to it that aren't
> > in
> > > >> >>that
> > > >> >> font). Let me know your thoughts.
> > > >> >> [cid:ii_ikiheh940_152d12b461da413c]
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Christofer Dutz <
> > > >> >> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de<ma...@c-ware.de>>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >> I think I'm not the right person for some Text about FlexJS ... I'm
> > > >>just
> > > >> >> taking care of the tooling. Think Alex, Om or the others would be
> > > >>better
> > > >> >> suited to do that. I was just looking for something I can add to my
> > > >> >>stuff
> > > >> >> to make people curious and click on the link to the FlexJS page. If
> > > >>the
> > > >> >> logo simply is the Flex-Logo, most people won't click on it, but a
> > > >> >>FlexJS
> > > >> >> logo where the JS part pops the eye should definitely gain some
> > > >> >>attention.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Would be great if you could whip up some logo for that :-)
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Chris
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> ________________________________________
> > > >> >> Von: Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholaskwiatkowski@gmail.com<mailto:
> > > >> >> nicholaskwiatkowski@gmail.com>>
> > > >> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 13:54
> > > >> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>
> > > >> >> Betreff: Re: FlexJS Logo?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I think everything would be branded under our existing "Apache
> > Flex"
> > > >> >>logo,
> > > >> >> but with different text.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I have the source EPS files they gave us, so I can make that.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> FlexJS does have its own portion of the new website I'm working on
> > --
> > > >> >>but I
> > > >> >> don't have any text. If you'd be willing to supply it, I can put
> > it
> > > >>up
> > > >> >> right now.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> -Nick
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Christofer Dutz <
> > > >> >> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de<ma...@c-ware.de>>
> > > >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Hi,
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > I would like to start creating a few FlexJS tools. I would like
> > to
> > > >> >>add a
> > > >> >> > Powered by FlexJS logo to them, that links them back to our
> > FlexJS
> > > >> >> website
> > > >> >> > (we do have such a thing? A shiny, landing page punting out the
> > > >> >> awesomeness
> > > >> >> > of FlexJS). Do we have such a logo? If not, could someone whip up
> > > >> >>such a
> > > >> >> > thing?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Chris
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
AW: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Thanks :-)
________________________________
Von: Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 10:44:40
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Here's the kinder logo then : )
http://pasteboard.co/hzEUfvsMJ.png
You can download the image from 'Download Image' option on the top right
corner of the screen.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> Well I would love the designs with the JS in the Style of the Flex ... for
> me the red one was sort of the one I looked at first, but I think the Green
> one is the kinder one. I see it that way:
>
>
> JS is generally RED, but the way we code JS is the GREEN way ;-)
>
>
> I would be really happy if you could send me a high res Version of the
> Logo so I could add that to my slides for my FlexJS talk on Thursday ;-)
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 07:38:56
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
>
> Kindly feel free to use any of those designs. Let me know if I need to
> official send out any legal stuff.
>
> Those were basics designs we had been trying that time. I think if we
> freeze on one design, I can send out a high resolution logo of that design,
> so that people can refer/use that logo.
>
> -Deepak
>
> On 4 Sep 2016 7:50 pm, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/4/16, 4:27 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I didn't caught this one at that time. I think It looks very good. I will
> >grab it :)
>
> I don't know enough about branding to know whether we have to pick one
> color or not.
> I think we would at minimum need an ICLA from Deepak.
>
> -Alex
>
Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Posted by Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>.
Here's the kinder logo then : )
http://pasteboard.co/hzEUfvsMJ.png
You can download the image from 'Download Image' option on the top right
corner of the screen.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> Well I would love the designs with the JS in the Style of the Flex ... for
> me the red one was sort of the one I looked at first, but I think the Green
> one is the kinder one. I see it that way:
>
>
> JS is generally RED, but the way we code JS is the GREEN way ;-)
>
>
> I would be really happy if you could send me a high res Version of the
> Logo so I could add that to my slides for my FlexJS talk on Thursday ;-)
>
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 07:38:56
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
>
> Kindly feel free to use any of those designs. Let me know if I need to
> official send out any legal stuff.
>
> Those were basics designs we had been trying that time. I think if we
> freeze on one design, I can send out a high resolution logo of that design,
> so that people can refer/use that logo.
>
> -Deepak
>
> On 4 Sep 2016 7:50 pm, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/4/16, 4:27 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I didn't caught this one at that time. I think It looks very good. I will
> >grab it :)
>
> I don't know enough about branding to know whether we have to pick one
> color or not.
> I think we would at minimum need an ICLA from Deepak.
>
> -Alex
>
AW: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Well I would love the designs with the JS in the Style of the Flex ... for me the red one was sort of the one I looked at first, but I think the Green one is the kinder one. I see it that way:
JS is generally RED, but the way we code JS is the GREEN way ;-)
I would be really happy if you could send me a high res Version of the Logo so I could add that to my slides for my FlexJS talk on Thursday ;-)
Chris
________________________________
Von: Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 07:38:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Kindly feel free to use any of those designs. Let me know if I need to
official send out any legal stuff.
Those were basics designs we had been trying that time. I think if we
freeze on one design, I can send out a high resolution logo of that design,
so that people can refer/use that logo.
-Deepak
On 4 Sep 2016 7:50 pm, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
On 9/4/16, 4:27 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>I didn't caught this one at that time. I think It looks very good. I will
>grab it :)
I don't know enough about branding to know whether we have to pick one
color or not.
I think we would at minimum need an ICLA from Deepak.
-Alex
Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Posted by Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>.
Kindly feel free to use any of those designs. Let me know if I need to
official send out any legal stuff.
Those were basics designs we had been trying that time. I think if we
freeze on one design, I can send out a high resolution logo of that design,
so that people can refer/use that logo.
-Deepak
On 4 Sep 2016 7:50 pm, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
On 9/4/16, 4:27 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>I didn't caught this one at that time. I think It looks very good. I will
>grab it :)
I don't know enough about branding to know whether we have to pick one
color or not.
I think we would at minimum need an ICLA from Deepak.
-Alex
Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 9/4/16, 4:27 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>I didn't caught this one at that time. I think It looks very good. I will
>grab it :)
I don't know enough about branding to know whether we have to pick one
color or not.
I think we would at minimum need an ICLA from Deepak.
-Alex
Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
I didn't caught this one at that time. I think It looks very good. I will
grab it :)
2016-09-03 17:56 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>:
> Hi Guys,
>
> let me kick off the Dust of this Thread :-)
>
> Somehow the discussion on this stopped. I would really like to use one of
> these logos in my Presentation. I still think we should use one of the
> colored ones. Even if green is the most friendly one, somehow JS for me is
> sort of "red". I just did a short picture search, and that sort of looks as
> if most JS logos are Yellow to Orange.
>
> What do you think? I really like the disgns Deepak used in his last post:
> http://snag.gy/544ut.jpg
>
> Would it be ok for me to use one of them in my slides?
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 2016-02-15 14:47 (+0200), Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > great stuff ... it's getting better and better ... even if I can't
> really say, which color I like most, but definitely one of the colors.
> > Probably the red or orange one stands out the most, but the green one is
> really friendly ;-)
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Von: Deepak MS <me...@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2016 09:45
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: FlexJS Logo?
> >
> > Tried to pick up 'J' from existing 'F' to maintain the text design flow.
> > Some of the variations:
> >
> > http://snag.gy/544ut.jpg
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Josh Tynjala <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with Alex that everything on the same baseline looks better.
> The
> > > subscript adds negative space in the middle that makes the eye jump all
> > > over the place.
> > >
> > > I would experiment with making the "apache" text larger so that it
> starts
> > > closer to the top of the l, like the Apache Flex logo without the JS.
> > >
> > > - Josh
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Nick. If it were up to me, I would choose the all-black
> > > > all-on-the-same-baseline (flexjs-logo-baseline), but I am definitely
> less
> > > > hip than you so I will defer to others.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 2/12/16, 9:12 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski"
> > > > <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Here are some of the deviations you asked for :
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=ED8E53EA91913A03!
> 3221&authkey=!ADQdx
> > > > >D68LZwx-2s&ithint=folder%2c
> > > > >
> > > > >I've been told that the JS as a subscript is the new hipster thing
> to
> > > do,
> > > > >but I don't really know. I'm not an artist or a graphic designer
> -- I
> > > > >just
> > > > >know how to use Illustrator and Photoshop.
> > > > >
> > > > >-Nick
> > > > >
> > > > >On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Interesting. I don't want to start a huge discussion, but can you
> > > make
> > > > >>a
> > > > >> version that has the JS on the same baseline? Or is a subscript
> "JS"
> > > > >>the
> > > > >> new hip trend?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> -Alex
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2/12/16, 6:33 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski"
> > > > >> <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >Lets try this another way :
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=ED8E53EA91913A03!
> 3217&authkey=!AM33
> > > > >>B
> > > > >> >WbIWmdOkI4&ithint=folder%2c
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Christofer Dutz
> > > > >> ><ch...@c-ware.de>
> > > > >> >wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Hmmm ... that didn't seem to work ... I only got an empty
> > > > >>"error-image"
> > > > >> >>...
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> ________________________________
> > > > >> >> Von: Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 17:31
> > > > >> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > > >> >> Betreff: Re: FlexJS Logo?
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Here is a quick stab at a FlexJS logo. I don't have the
> original
> > > > >>font
> > > > >> >> they used in the logo (they said it was Calibri, which is what
> I
> > > used
> > > > >> >>here,
> > > > >> >> but it looks like there were some embellishments to it that
> aren't
> > > in
> > > > >> >>that
> > > > >> >> font). Let me know your thoughts.
> > > > >> >> [cid:ii_ikiheh940_152d12b461da413c]
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Christofer Dutz <
> > > > >> >> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de<ma...@c-ware.de>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >> I think I'm not the right person for some Text about FlexJS
> ... I'm
> > > > >>just
> > > > >> >> taking care of the tooling. Think Alex, Om or the others would
> be
> > > > >>better
> > > > >> >> suited to do that. I was just looking for something I can add
> to my
> > > > >> >>stuff
> > > > >> >> to make people curious and click on the link to the FlexJS
> page. If
> > > > >>the
> > > > >> >> logo simply is the Flex-Logo, most people won't click on it,
> but a
> > > > >> >>FlexJS
> > > > >> >> logo where the JS part pops the eye should definitely gain some
> > > > >> >>attention.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Would be great if you could whip up some logo for that :-)
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Chris
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> ________________________________________
> > > > >> >> Von: Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholaskwiatkowski@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> > > > >> >> nicholaskwiatkowski@gmail.com>>
> > > > >> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 13:54
> > > > >> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>
> > > > >> >> Betreff: Re: FlexJS Logo?
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> I think everything would be branded under our existing "Apache
> > > Flex"
> > > > >> >>logo,
> > > > >> >> but with different text.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> I have the source EPS files they gave us, so I can make that.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> FlexJS does have its own portion of the new website I'm
> working on
> > > --
> > > > >> >>but I
> > > > >> >> don't have any text. If you'd be willing to supply it, I can
> put
> > > it
> > > > >>up
> > > > >> >> right now.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> -Nick
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Christofer Dutz <
> > > > >> >> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de<ma...@c-ware.de>>
> > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> > Hi,
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> > I would like to start creating a few FlexJS tools. I would
> like
> > > to
> > > > >> >>add a
> > > > >> >> > Powered by FlexJS logo to them, that links them back to our
> > > FlexJS
> > > > >> >> website
> > > > >> >> > (we do have such a thing? A shiny, landing page punting out
> the
> > > > >> >> awesomeness
> > > > >> >> > of FlexJS). Do we have such a logo? If not, could someone
> whip up
> > > > >> >>such a
> > > > >> >> > thing?
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> > Chris
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.