You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2008/11/07 09:16:16 UTC
[Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Hi folks,
currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however
is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big*
improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
enhancements (new (api) features).
I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a
maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a)
spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make
sense
to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
features require JSF 1.2.
Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that
has a more detailed outline.
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
over the last 1,5 weeks, I only got positive feedback on this.
So I filed this task against myself:
-https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1311
-https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1312
-Matthias
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Jeanne Waldman
<je...@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Cagatay Civici wrote, On 11/7/2008 10:53 AM PT:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Cagatay
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek
>> <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>
>> I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
>>
>> -Andrew
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
>> <matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1,
>> however
>> > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
>> > I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
>> >
>> > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
>> > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
>> >
>> > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
>> > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least
>> for *big*
>> > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
>> > enhancements (new (api) features).
>> >
>> > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda
>> go into a
>> > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
>> >
>> > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit
>> since a)
>> > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would
>> make
>> > sense
>> > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
>> > features require JSF 1.2.
>> >
>> > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki
>> page, that
>> > has a more detailed outline.
>> >
>> > -Matthias
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Posted by Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com>.
+1
Cagatay Civici wrote, On 11/7/2008 10:53 AM PT:
> +1
>
> Cagatay
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek
> <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>
> I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
> <matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1,
> however
> > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
> > I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
> >
> > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
> > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
> >
> > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
> > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least
> for *big*
> > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
> > enhancements (new (api) features).
> >
> > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda
> go into a
> > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
> >
> > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit
> since a)
> > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would
> make
> > sense
> > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
> > features require JSF 1.2.
> >
> > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki
> page, that
> > has a more detailed outline.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
Re: [Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>.
Ok. Sorry. I will do it next week.
Sent from my iPod.
Am 07.11.2008 um 20:49 schrieb "Grant Smith" <wo...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> However, is there any chance of clearing out some of the branches/
> in the svn repo ? Theres a ton of branches, do we really need them
> all ? Doing a clean myfaces/ checkout was a real pain with all that
> extra bloat.
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> +1
>
> Cagatay
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
>
> I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
> <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however
> > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
> > I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
> >
> > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
> > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
> >
> > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
> > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big*
> > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
> > enhancements (new (api) features).
> >
> > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go
> into a
> > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
> >
> > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a)
> > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make
> > sense
> > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
> > features require JSF 1.2.
> >
> > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that
> > has a more detailed outline.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
Re: [Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
+1
However, is there any chance of clearing out some of the branches/ in the
svn repo ? Theres a ton of branches, do we really need them all ? Doing a
clean myfaces/ checkout was a real pain with all that extra bloat.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1
>
> Cagatay
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
>>
>> I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
>>>
>>> -Andrew
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi folks,
>>> >
>>> > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however
>>> > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
>>> > I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
>>> >
>>> > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
>>> > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
>>> >
>>> > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
>>> > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big*
>>> > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
>>> > enhancements (new (api) features).
>>> >
>>> > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a
>>> > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
>>> >
>>> > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a)
>>> > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make
>>> > sense
>>> > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
>>> > features require JSF 1.2.
>>> >
>>> > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that
>>> > has a more detailed outline.
>>> >
>>> > -Matthias
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >
>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: [Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Posted by Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>.
+1
Cagatay
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
> wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
>
> I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
>>
>> -Andrew
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however
>> > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
>> > I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
>> >
>> > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
>> > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
>> >
>> > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
>> > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big*
>> > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
>> > enhancements (new (api) features).
>> >
>> > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a
>> > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
>> >
>> > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a)
>> > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make
>> > sense
>> > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
>> > features require JSF 1.2.
>> >
>> > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that
>> > has a more detailed outline.
>> >
>> > -Matthias
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: [Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2008/11/7 Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>
> I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however
> > is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
> > I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
> >
> > trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
> > trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
> >
> > Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
> > release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big*
> > improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
> > enhancements (new (api) features).
> >
> > I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a
> > maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
> >
> > Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a)
> > spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make
> > sense
> > to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
> > features require JSF 1.2.
> >
> > Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that
> > has a more detailed outline.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Trinidad] a roadmap ?
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
I am all for making 1.2 the trunk and 1.0 a support-based branch
-Andrew
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> currently we support both, JSF 1.1 and JSF 1.2. The JSF 1.1, however
> is the real trunk and JSF 1.2 is kinda a stepchild like trunk.
> I'd like to *swap* the trunks.
>
> trunk -> JSF 1.2 based Trinidad
> trunk1x -> JSF 1.1 based Trinidad
>
> Also, I'd like focus for upcoming releases (not the next 1.x.10
> release) more on the JSF 1.2 version of Trinidad, at least for *big*
> improvements (like fixing memory leaks, HA support, etc.) or
> enhancements (new (api) features).
>
> I think technically that would mean, the 1.0.n version kinda go into a
> maintaining stage, where we "only" apply (serious) bug fixes.
>
> Also, when we move to JSF 2.0 (yes... that may take a bit since a)
> spec isn't final b) nobody will use it before 2010) it would make
> sense
> to kinda focus only on JSF 1.2, since applying those *new* 2.0
> features require JSF 1.2.
>
> Based the communities feedback, I'd like to write a wiki page, that
> has a more detailed outline.
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>