You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> on 2014/06/25 01:04:58 UTC
[REQUEST] Seeking volunteer replacement mentors for NPanday
Hi!
given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
could consider spending your cycles helping
NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
please reply to this thread.
My goal is to find at least one active replacement
mentor by the end of this week.
Thanks,
Roman.
Re: [REQUEST] Seeking volunteer replacement mentors for NPanday
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Done. The email has been sent to the npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
Cos
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 07:07PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since in 5 days nobody else volunteered, I'd like
> to propose that we finalize Cos's offer of his
> cycles and replace the current AWOL mentors
> with him.
>
> I'll make sure this gets recorded in the podling
> XML description.
>
> Cos, can you please follow up with the NPanday
> community and work out a transition plan with
> them? I guess the first order of business would
> be to help them with the monthly report (they
> are on schedule for this one). If you could
> do that before Wed -- that would be very much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hey Roman.
> >
> > I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
> > wants to step in.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
> >> I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
> >> could consider spending your cycles helping
> >> NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
> >> please reply to this thread.
> >>
> >> My goal is to find at least one active replacement
> >> mentor by the end of this week.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Roman.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
Re: [REQUEST] Seeking volunteer replacement mentors for NPanday
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Done. The email has been sent to the npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
Cos
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 07:07PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since in 5 days nobody else volunteered, I'd like
> to propose that we finalize Cos's offer of his
> cycles and replace the current AWOL mentors
> with him.
>
> I'll make sure this gets recorded in the podling
> XML description.
>
> Cos, can you please follow up with the NPanday
> community and work out a transition plan with
> them? I guess the first order of business would
> be to help them with the monthly report (they
> are on schedule for this one). If you could
> do that before Wed -- that would be very much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hey Roman.
> >
> > I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
> > wants to step in.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
> >> I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
> >> could consider spending your cycles helping
> >> NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
> >> please reply to this thread.
> >>
> >> My goal is to find at least one active replacement
> >> mentor by the end of this week.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Roman.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [REQUEST] Seeking volunteer replacement mentors for NPanday
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
Hi!
Since in 5 days nobody else volunteered, I'd like
to propose that we finalize Cos's offer of his
cycles and replace the current AWOL mentors
with him.
I'll make sure this gets recorded in the podling
XML description.
Cos, can you please follow up with the NPanday
community and work out a transition plan with
them? I guess the first order of business would
be to help them with the monthly report (they
are on schedule for this one). If you could
do that before Wed -- that would be very much
appreciated.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey Roman.
>
> I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
> wants to step in.
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
>> I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
>> could consider spending your cycles helping
>> NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
>> please reply to this thread.
>>
>> My goal is to find at least one active replacement
>> mentor by the end of this week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
Re: [REQUEST] Seeking volunteer replacement mentors for NPanday
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
Hi!
Since in 5 days nobody else volunteered, I'd like
to propose that we finalize Cos's offer of his
cycles and replace the current AWOL mentors
with him.
I'll make sure this gets recorded in the podling
XML description.
Cos, can you please follow up with the NPanday
community and work out a transition plan with
them? I guess the first order of business would
be to help them with the monthly report (they
are on schedule for this one). If you could
do that before Wed -- that would be very much
appreciated.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey Roman.
>
> I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
> wants to step in.
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
>> I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
>> could consider spending your cycles helping
>> NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
>> please reply to this thread.
>>
>> My goal is to find at least one active replacement
>> mentor by the end of this week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
AW: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Lars Corneliussen // Zen <me...@lcorneliussen.de>.
I guess the deadline passed by :( :-)
I hope to be able to use some time on npanday in march/april next year
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Konstantin Boudnik [mailto:cos@apache.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. November 2014 06:44
An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Guys,
the report was due on 5th, so the shepherds can put on their notes by the end of tomorrow. Is anyone works on it?
Thanks,
Cos
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:41PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I won't have any ability to do that, or a report, for at least two
> weeks (and lots of stuff going on the month after that). It'd be great
> if someone else can pick it up - it doesn't require being a committer.
>
> - Brett
>
> > On 3 Nov 2014, at 5:56 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Any one in the community has cycles to do the pre-release docs review?
> >
> > I would be happy to, but I am not really familiar with the code to
> > make sane documentation comments.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:02PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >> Hi Konstantin,
> >>
> >> I don't think there's been any progress. I've been occupied on
> >> other projects for the last couple of months.
> >>
> >> It is ready to go other than a review of the docs which are a little stale.
> >> Has anyone else had a chance to look at the docs? Anyone want to
> >> try the release process?
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >>> On 17 Oct 2014, at 3:23 pm, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Guys,
> >>>
> >>> are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to
> >>> be a chunk of activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point.
> >>>
> >>> Can I help anyhow?
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>> I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list
> >>>> last Friday - only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over
> >>>> the getting started documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be
> >>>> particularly helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and
> >>>> contributions to the documentation would be most welcome.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is
> >>>>> "good enough" to be released from the community standpoint - I'd
> >>>>> go for it. But as always - it should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
> >>>>>> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
> >>>>>> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Last issue to resolve would be
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per
> >>>>>> project. I think if that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>>>> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von
> >>>>>> Brett Porter
> >>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
> >>>>>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over
> >>>>>> the non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can
> >>>>>> be closed or bumped.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Brett
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ladies and gentlemen.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are
> >>>>>>> only 4 tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are
> >>>>>>> effectively standing between today and the next release of the
> >>>>>>> project. One of the critical is
> >>>>>> also an improvement.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the
> >>>>>>> blockers and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic
> >>>>>>> will help to get the release out so the users have something
> >>>>>>> new to work with. And it also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What do you guys think?
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Guys,
the report was due on 5th, so the shepherds can put on their notes by the end
of tomorrow. Is anyone works on it?
Thanks,
Cos
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:41PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I won't have any ability to do that, or a report, for at least two weeks
> (and lots of stuff going on the month after that). It'd be great if someone
> else can pick it up - it doesn't require being a committer.
>
> - Brett
>
> > On 3 Nov 2014, at 5:56 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Any one in the community has cycles to do the pre-release docs review?
> >
> > I would be happy to, but I am not really familiar with the code to make sane
> > documentation comments.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:02PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >> Hi Konstantin,
> >>
> >> I don't think there's been any progress. I've been occupied on other
> >> projects for the last couple of months.
> >>
> >> It is ready to go other than a review of the docs which are a little stale.
> >> Has anyone else had a chance to look at the docs? Anyone want to try the
> >> release process?
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >>> On 17 Oct 2014, at 3:23 pm, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Guys,
> >>>
> >>> are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to be a chunk of
> >>> activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point.
> >>>
> >>> Can I help anyhow?
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>> I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday -
> >>>> only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started
> >>>> documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly
> >>>> helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the
> >>>> documentation would be most welcome.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to
> >>>>> be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it
> >>>>> should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
> >>>>>> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
> >>>>>> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Last issue to resolve would be
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
> >>>>>> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>>>> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
> >>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
> >>>>>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
> >>>>>> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
> >>>>>> bumped.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Brett
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ladies and gentlemen.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
> >>>>>>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
> >>>>>>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
> >>>>>> also an improvement.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
> >>>>>>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
> >>>>>>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
> >>>>>>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What do you guys think?
> >>>>>>> Cos
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I won't have any ability to do that, or a report, for at least two weeks (and lots of stuff going on the month after that). It'd be great if someone else can pick it up - it doesn't require being a committer.
- Brett
> On 3 Nov 2014, at 5:56 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Any one in the community has cycles to do the pre-release docs review?
>
> I would be happy to, but I am not really familiar with the code to make sane
> documentation comments.
>
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:02PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> Hi Konstantin,
>>
>> I don't think there's been any progress. I've been occupied on other
>> projects for the last couple of months.
>>
>> It is ready to go other than a review of the docs which are a little stale.
>> Has anyone else had a chance to look at the docs? Anyone want to try the
>> release process?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>>> On 17 Oct 2014, at 3:23 pm, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to be a chunk of
>>> activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point.
>>>
>>> Can I help anyhow?
>>> Regards,
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>> I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday -
>>>> only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started
>>>> documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly
>>>> helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the
>>>> documentation would be most welcome.
>>>>
>>>> - Brett
>>>>
>>>> On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to
>>>>> be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it
>>>>> should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
>>>>>> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
>>>>>> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last issue to resolve would be
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
>>>>>> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
>>>>>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
>>>>>> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
>>>>>> bumped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Brett
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ladies and gentlemen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
>>>>>>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
>>>>>>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
>>>>>> also an improvement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
>>>>>>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
>>>>>>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
>>>>>>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>>>> Cos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Any one in the community has cycles to do the pre-release docs review?
I would be happy to, but I am not really familiar with the code to make sane
documentation comments.
Regards,
Cos
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:02PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I don't think there's been any progress. I've been occupied on other
> projects for the last couple of months.
>
> It is ready to go other than a review of the docs which are a little stale.
> Has anyone else had a chance to look at the docs? Anyone want to try the
> release process?
>
> - Brett
>
> > On 17 Oct 2014, at 3:23 pm, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to be a chunk of
> > activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point.
> >
> > Can I help anyhow?
> > Regards,
> > Cos
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >> I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday -
> >> only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started
> >> documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly
> >> helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the
> >> documentation would be most welcome.
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to
> >>> be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it
> >>> should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
> >>>
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
> >>>> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
> >>>> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Last issue to resolve would be
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
> >>>>
> >>>> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
> >>>> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
> >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
> >>>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
> >>>> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
> >>>> bumped.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ladies and gentlemen.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
> >>>>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
> >>>>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
> >>>> also an improvement.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
> >>>>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
> >>>>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
> >>>>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you guys think?
> >>>>> Cos
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Hi Konstantin,
I don't think there's been any progress. I've been occupied on other projects for the last couple of months.
It is ready to go other than a review of the docs which are a little stale. Has anyone else had a chance to look at the docs? Anyone want to try the release process?
- Brett
> On 17 Oct 2014, at 3:23 pm, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to be a chunk of
> activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point.
>
> Can I help anyhow?
> Regards,
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday -
>> only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started
>> documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use.
>>
>> Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly
>> helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the
>> documentation would be most welcome.
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to
>>> be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it
>>> should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
>>>
>>> Cos
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
>>>> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
>>>> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
>>>>
>>>> Last issue to resolve would be
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
>>>>
>>>> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
>>>> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
>>>>
>>>> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
>>>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
>>>>
>>>> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
>>>> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
>>>> bumped.
>>>>
>>>> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Brett
>>>>
>>>> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ladies and gentlemen.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
>>>>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
>>>>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
>>>> also an improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
>>>>>
>>>>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
>>>>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
>>>>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
>>>>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>> Cos
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Guys,
are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to be a chunk of
activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point.
Can I help anyhow?
Regards,
Cos
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday -
> only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started
> documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use.
>
> Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly
> helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the
> documentation would be most welcome.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to
> > be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it
> > should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
> >> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
> >> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
> >>
> >> Last issue to resolve would be
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
> >>
> >> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
> >> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
> >>
> >> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
> >> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
> >>
> >> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
> >>
> >> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
> >> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
> >> bumped.
> >>
> >> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Brett
> >>
> >> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ladies and gentlemen.
> >>>
> >>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
> >>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
> >>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
> >> also an improvement.
> >>>
> >>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
> >>>
> >>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
> >>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
> >>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
> >>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
> >>>
> >>> What do you guys think?
> >>> Cos
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday - only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use.
Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the documentation would be most welcome.
- Brett
On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to
> be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it
> should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
>
> Cos
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
>> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
>> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
>>
>> Last issue to resolve would be
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
>>
>> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
>> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
>>
>> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
>>
>> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
>>
>> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
>> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
>> bumped.
>>
>> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brett
>>
>> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Ladies and gentlemen.
>>>
>>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
>>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
>>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
>> also an improvement.
>>>
>>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
>>>
>>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
>>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
>>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
>>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
>>>
>>> What do you guys think?
>>> Cos
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to
be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it
should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
Cos
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote:
> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
>
> Last issue to resolve would be
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
>
> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
>
> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
>
> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
>
> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
> bumped.
>
> Do any others have a moment to look through them?
>
> Thanks,
> Brett
>
> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Ladies and gentlemen.
> >
> > I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
> > tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
> > between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
> also an improvement.
> >
> > Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
> >
> > I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
> > and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
> > the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
> > also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> > Cos
> >
>
>
AW: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Lars Corneliussen // Zen <me...@lcorneliussen.de>.
I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there.
The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now.
Last issue to resolve would be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599
Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if
that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43
An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the
non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or
bumped.
Do any others have a moment to look through them?
Thanks,
Brett
On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen.
>
> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4
> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing
> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is
also an improvement.
>
> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
>
> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers
> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get
> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it
> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors?
>
> What do you guys think?
> Cos
>
Re: Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin.
I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or bumped.
Do any others have a moment to look through them?
Thanks,
Brett
On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen.
>
> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4 tickets (of
> which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing between today and the
> next release of the project. One of the critical is also an improvement.
>
> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
>
> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers and push
> Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get the release out
> so the users have something new to work with. And it also will provide a new
> development baseline for the contributors?
>
> What do you guys think?
> Cos
>
Release 1.5.0 ??
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Ladies and gentlemen.
I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4 tickets (of
which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing between today and the
next release of the project. One of the critical is also an improvement.
Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS
I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers and push
Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get the release out
so the users have something new to work with. And it also will provide a new
development baseline for the contributors?
What do you guys think?
Cos
Re: [REQUEST] Seeking volunteer replacement mentors for NPanday
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Hey Roman.
I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
wants to step in.
Regards,
Cos
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
> I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
> could consider spending your cycles helping
> NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
> please reply to this thread.
>
> My goal is to find at least one active replacement
> mentor by the end of this week.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: [REQUEST] Seeking volunteer replacement mentors for NPanday
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Hey Roman.
I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
wants to step in.
Regards,
Cos
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
> I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If you
> could consider spending your cycles helping
> NPanday community figure out the roadmap ahead,
> please reply to this thread.
>
> My goal is to find at least one active replacement
> mentor by the end of this week.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>