You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to infrastructure-dev@apache.org by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> on 2012/10/01 09:42:36 UTC

Re: New "When and how to contact infra" FAQ

Daniel,

While I haven't read nor looked at the other N places nor suffered the
pain, I do think this is a great document, (especially if you eradicate
the N other pages!). I found it very clear and usable.

My only other comment is that if the tlpreq page isn't up and working
yet (even if it will be soon!), the page should show what is needed to
create a TLP *now*, and can be updated once tlpreq is there.

Thanks!

Upayavira

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> http://www.staging.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
> 
> Reviews, please.  If no objections, I'll promote it from "Draft policy"
> to "Policy" and consolidate the N other places that answer this question
> (hi Crossley!) into this one.  (I imagine it'll end up as a table for
> quick-reference, with detailed description either in the "Notes" column
> or in separate FAQ-like entries linked from it.)
> 
> Oh, and there are 2-3 TODO comments in the source, which I hope I won't
> forget to address at that time too...

Re: New "When and how to contact infra" FAQ

Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.

Thanks, and done.

Upayavira wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:42:36 +0100:
> Daniel,
> 
> While I haven't read nor looked at the other N places nor suffered the
> pain, I do think this is a great document, (especially if you eradicate
> the N other pages!). I found it very clear and usable.
> 
> My only other comment is that if the tlpreq page isn't up and working
> yet (even if it will be soon!), the page should show what is needed to
> create a TLP *now*, and can be updated once tlpreq is there.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Upayavira
> 
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > http://www.staging.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
> > 
> > Reviews, please.  If no objections, I'll promote it from "Draft policy"
> > to "Policy" and consolidate the N other places that answer this question
> > (hi Crossley!) into this one.  (I imagine it'll end up as a table for
> > quick-reference, with detailed description either in the "Notes" column
> > or in separate FAQ-like entries linked from it.)
> > 
> > Oh, and there are 2-3 TODO comments in the source, which I hope I won't
> > forget to address at that time too...