You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> on 2024/10/10 01:38:54 UTC
[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Hey all,
I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on October 13,
2024 01:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
Consider this my (binding) +1.
Airflow Providers are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
*apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
packages.
*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
Python "wheel" release.
The test procedure for PMC members is described in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
described in:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
Public keys are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
the artifact checksums when we actually release.
The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/42882
The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
candidates.
Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.0.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/5.8.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.6.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.11.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.8.3rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cloudant/4.0.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/9.0.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-compat/1.2.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.4.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.18.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/6.11.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.11.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.5.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.4.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.24.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jdbc/4.5.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/10.5.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/5.7.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.12.2rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opensearch/1.5.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.13.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.8.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.8.1rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ydb/1.4.0rc1/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>.
+1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums and licences.
On Sunday, October 13, 2024, Vishnu Chilukoori <vi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 Non binding
>
> --
> Regards,
> Vishnu C.
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024, 05:00 Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding, tested my changes on a few dag examples, everything looks
> > good!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pavan Kumar
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 4:43 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding on sigs, license & checksums
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 20:46, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures,
> > licences.
> > > > That also includes sdist packages tests.
> > > >
> > > > I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC
> > steps
> > > > for reproducibility of providers to more selectively exclude Python
> > 3.12
> > > > when running reproducibility checks:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42944
> > > >
> > > > There was a problem raised that Python 3.12 could not be used for
> > breeze
> > > > (there was a python version check), and the main reason was that
> > > > reproducibility check also includes verification of .sdist packages
> of
> > > ours
> > > > - and this verification fails for Python 3.12 because Apache Beam
> still
> > > > does not support Python 3.12 (
> > > https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32617
> > > > )
> > > >
> > > > Apparently it was not very clear why Python 3.12 is excluded from
> > breeze,
> > > > so I am adding this explanation here for those PMC members who follow
> > the
> > > > most important "release" threads of ours, so that they are aware of
> it.
> > > >
> > > > Those PMC members who do not run PMC verification now should be able
> to
> > > use
> > > > Python 3.12 to help release manager to verify if providers are ready
> to
> > > > release and gives they +1
> > > >
> > > > Those PMC members who do not help in this effort, can still use
> Python
> > > 3.12
> > > > for their breeze commands.
> > > >
> > > > I hope that explanation is prominent enough so that I do not have to
> > > > explain it additionally,
> > > >
> > > > J.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Vishnu Chilukoori <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1 Non binding
--
Regards,
Vishnu C.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024, 05:00 Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 non binding, tested my changes on a few dag examples, everything looks
> good!
>
> Regards,
> Pavan Kumar
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 4:43 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding on sigs, license & checksums
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 20:46, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures,
> licences.
> > > That also includes sdist packages tests.
> > >
> > > I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC
> steps
> > > for reproducibility of providers to more selectively exclude Python
> 3.12
> > > when running reproducibility checks:
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42944
> > >
> > > There was a problem raised that Python 3.12 could not be used for
> breeze
> > > (there was a python version check), and the main reason was that
> > > reproducibility check also includes verification of .sdist packages of
> > ours
> > > - and this verification fails for Python 3.12 because Apache Beam still
> > > does not support Python 3.12 (
> > https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32617
> > > )
> > >
> > > Apparently it was not very clear why Python 3.12 is excluded from
> breeze,
> > > so I am adding this explanation here for those PMC members who follow
> the
> > > most important "release" threads of ours, so that they are aware of it.
> > >
> > > Those PMC members who do not run PMC verification now should be able to
> > use
> > > Python 3.12 to help release manager to verify if providers are ready to
> > > release and gives they +1
> > >
> > > Those PMC members who do not help in this effort, can still use Python
> > 3.12
> > > for their breeze commands.
> > >
> > > I hope that explanation is prominent enough so that I do not have to
> > > explain it additionally,
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@gmail.com>.
+1 non binding, tested my changes on a few dag examples, everything looks
good!
Regards,
Pavan Kumar
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 4:43 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 binding on sigs, license & checksums
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 20:46, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures, licences.
> > That also includes sdist packages tests.
> >
> > I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC steps
> > for reproducibility of providers to more selectively exclude Python 3.12
> > when running reproducibility checks:
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42944
> >
> > There was a problem raised that Python 3.12 could not be used for breeze
> > (there was a python version check), and the main reason was that
> > reproducibility check also includes verification of .sdist packages of
> ours
> > - and this verification fails for Python 3.12 because Apache Beam still
> > does not support Python 3.12 (
> https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32617
> > )
> >
> > Apparently it was not very clear why Python 3.12 is excluded from breeze,
> > so I am adding this explanation here for those PMC members who follow the
> > most important "release" threads of ours, so that they are aware of it.
> >
> > Those PMC members who do not run PMC verification now should be able to
> use
> > Python 3.12 to help release manager to verify if providers are ready to
> > release and gives they +1
> >
> > Those PMC members who do not help in this effort, can still use Python
> 3.12
> > for their breeze commands.
> >
> > I hope that explanation is prominent enough so that I do not have to
> > explain it additionally,
> >
> > J.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding on sigs, license & checksums
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 20:46, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures, licences.
> That also includes sdist packages tests.
>
> I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC steps
> for reproducibility of providers to more selectively exclude Python 3.12
> when running reproducibility checks:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42944
>
> There was a problem raised that Python 3.12 could not be used for breeze
> (there was a python version check), and the main reason was that
> reproducibility check also includes verification of .sdist packages of ours
> - and this verification fails for Python 3.12 because Apache Beam still
> does not support Python 3.12 (https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32617
> )
>
> Apparently it was not very clear why Python 3.12 is excluded from breeze,
> so I am adding this explanation here for those PMC members who follow the
> most important "release" threads of ours, so that they are aware of it.
>
> Those PMC members who do not run PMC verification now should be able to use
> Python 3.12 to help release manager to verify if providers are ready to
> release and gives they +1
>
> Those PMC members who do not help in this effort, can still use Python 3.12
> for their breeze commands.
>
> I hope that explanation is prominent enough so that I do not have to
> explain it additionally,
>
> J.
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures, licences.
That also includes sdist packages tests.
I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC steps
for reproducibility of providers to more selectively exclude Python 3.12
when running reproducibility checks:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42944
There was a problem raised that Python 3.12 could not be used for breeze
(there was a python version check), and the main reason was that
reproducibility check also includes verification of .sdist packages of ours
- and this verification fails for Python 3.12 because Apache Beam still
does not support Python 3.12 (https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32617)
Apparently it was not very clear why Python 3.12 is excluded from breeze,
so I am adding this explanation here for those PMC members who follow the
most important "release" threads of ours, so that they are aware of it.
Those PMC members who do not run PMC verification now should be able to use
Python 3.12 to help release manager to verify if providers are ready to
release and gives they +1
Those PMC members who do not help in this effort, can still use Python 3.12
for their breeze commands.
I hope that explanation is prominent enough so that I do not have to
explain it additionally,
J.
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
+1 non binding
Tested my dag set, looks good!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:03 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), tested my changes and a few example dags
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Oct 11, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
> > Licenses, Signatures
> >
> > On 10.10.24 13:15, Freddy Demiane wrote:
> >> +1 (non-binding) on google providers package
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:40 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> >>> calling a vote on the release,
> >>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on October
> 13,
> >>> 2024 01:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> >>>
> >>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >>>
> >>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >>>
> >>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> >>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> provider
> >>> packages.
> >>>
> >>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> >>> Python "wheel" release.
> >>>
> >>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >>>
> >>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> is
> >>> described in:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Public keys are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please vote accordingly:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>>
> >>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> are
> >>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >>>
> >>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> >>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> >>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >>>
> >>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/42882
> >>>
> >>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> RC
> >>> candidates.
> >>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> documentation
> >>> after the
> >>> RC candidates are released.
> >>>
> >>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.0.0rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/5.8.1rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.6.1rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.11.1rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.8.3rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cloudant/4.0.1rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/9.0.0rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-compat/1.2.1rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.4.2rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.18.0rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/6.11.0rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.11.0rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.5.2rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.4.1rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.24.0rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jdbc/4.5.2rc1/
> >>>
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/10.5.1rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/5.7.2rc1/
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.12.2rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opensearch/1.5.0rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.13.1rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.8.0rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.8.1rc1/
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ydb/1.4.0rc1/
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Elad Kalif
> >>>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding), tested my changes and a few example dags
Best,
Wei
> On Oct 11, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.INVALID> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
> Licenses, Signatures
>
> On 10.10.24 13:15, Freddy Demiane wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding) on google providers package
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:40 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>>> calling a vote on the release,
>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on October 13,
>>> 2024 01:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
>>>
>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>
>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>>
>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
>>> packages.
>>>
>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>> Python "wheel" release.
>>>
>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>>>
>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
>>> described in:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>>>
>>>
>>> Public keys are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>
>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>
>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/42882
>>>
>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
>>> candidates.
>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
>>> after the
>>> RC candidates are released.
>>>
>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>>>
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.0.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/5.8.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.6.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.11.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.8.3rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cloudant/4.0.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/9.0.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-compat/1.2.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.4.2rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.18.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/6.11.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.11.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.5.2rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.4.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.24.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jdbc/4.5.2rc1/
>>>
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/10.5.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/5.7.2rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.12.2rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opensearch/1.5.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.13.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.8.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.8.1rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ydb/1.4.0rc1/
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Elad Kalif
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Jens Scheffler <j_...@gmx.de.INVALID>.
+1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
Licenses, Signatures
On 10.10.24 13:15, Freddy Demiane wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) on google providers package
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:40 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>> calling a vote on the release,
>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on October 13,
>> 2024 01:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
>>
>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>
>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>
>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
>> packages.
>>
>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>> Python "wheel" release.
>>
>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>>
>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
>> described in:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>>
>>
>> Public keys are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>
>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>
>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/42882
>>
>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
>> candidates.
>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
>> after the
>> RC candidates are released.
>>
>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.0.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/5.8.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.6.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.11.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.8.3rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cloudant/4.0.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/9.0.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-compat/1.2.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.4.2rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.18.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/6.11.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.11.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.5.2rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.4.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.24.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jdbc/4.5.2rc1/
>>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/10.5.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/5.7.2rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.12.2rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opensearch/1.5.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.13.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.8.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.8.1rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ydb/1.4.0rc1/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Elad Kalif
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024
Posted by Freddy Demiane <fd...@google.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding) on google providers package
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:40 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on October 13,
> 2024 01:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
>
> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>
> Airflow Providers are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>
> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
> packages.
>
> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> Python "wheel" release.
>
> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>
> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> described in:
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>
>
> Public keys are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>
> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/42882
>
> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> candidates.
> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
> after the
> RC candidates are released.
>
> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.0.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/5.8.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.6.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.11.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.8.3rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cloudant/4.0.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/9.0.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-compat/1.2.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-io/1.4.2rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.18.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/6.11.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.11.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.5.2rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.4.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.24.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jdbc/4.5.2rc1/
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/10.5.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/5.7.2rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.12.2rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opensearch/1.5.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.13.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/5.8.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.8.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ydb/1.4.0rc1/
>
> Cheers,
> Elad Kalif
>