You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Bryan Call (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/16 17:31:21 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (TS-3173) Configuration to control list of protocols advertised in the NPN/ALPN list

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Bryan Call updated TS-3173:
---------------------------
    Component/s:     (was: SPDY)

> Configuration to control list of protocols advertised in the NPN/ALPN list
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-3173
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3173
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HTTP, HTTP/2
>            Reporter: Sudheer Vinukonda
>             Fix For: sometime
>
>
> Currently, {{proxy.config.http.server_ports}} allows to configure supported/allowed list of protocols for a given proxy port. The same list gets sent as the advertised protocol list in the NPN/ALPN advertisement.
> However, there are situations, where the servers may want the allowed/supported protocol list to be different to the npn advertised list. For example, you may want to allow http/1.0 for clients not supporting npn extensions, but, do not want to advertise http/1.0 in the npn list to prevent clients that support npn extension from picking http/1.0.
> As such, I am wondering if we should have a separate control on the npn/alpn advertised protocol list. 
> If so, please provide comments/suggestions. One straightforward choice is to extend the supported parameters for proxy ports (i.e add another parameter similar to ":proto"), but, it seems like the configuration becomes more and more complex and harder to understand/comprehend.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)