You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by Jaydeep Vishwakarma <ja...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/27 07:17:00 UTC
Re: Review Request 31255: OOZIE-1638 Action retry does not respect
default retry max count
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31255/#review93074
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jaydeep Vishwakarma
On Feb. 21, 2015, 7:40 a.m., Azrael Seoeun Park wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31255/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2015, 7:40 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for oozie.
>
>
> Bugs: OOZIE-1638
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1638
>
>
> Repository: oozie-git
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Revised to respect oozie.service.LiteWorkflowStoreService.user.retry.max at oozie-default.xml
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/LiteWorkflowStoreService.java d661d08
> core/src/main/resources/oozie-default.xml 27ef11d
> core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/wf/TestActionErrors.java 8eb98af
> core/src/test/resources/wf-ext-schema-valid-user-retry-max.xml PRE-CREATION
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31255/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Unit test.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Azrael Seoeun Park
>
>