You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Sanjay Rao <sa...@4raos.com> on 2014/02/24 04:01:28 UTC
RTMPS / HTTPS support in 2.0
Couldn't find a definitive answer to - is rtmps and/or https supported in
2.0 on a Mac client? There are too many conflicting answers to this.
Appreciate if somebody can answer this question. I have followed published
instructions and also done enough research on configuration but still can't
get it to work.
Thanks
Sanjay
Re: RTMPS / HTTPS support in 2.0
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Unfortunately 3.0.0 is based on the same unstable version of red5
hopefully we will release 3.0.1 based on updated red5 with stable SSL
support
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Daniela Kirsch <dk...@excelsystems.com>wrote:
> We have tried it a lot too. And it did work on a Mac client. However it
> wasn't stable, so we also dropped it for now and will try again with 3.0.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Artur Neumann [ICT Projects, INF/N] <
> ict.projects@nepal.inf.org> wrote:
>
>> I've tried RTMPS with 2.1 and 2.2 in Oct 2013 with no luck. Maxim helped
>> a lot to investigate that problem. But we could not fix it so I, had to
>> drop the project of running OpenMeetings in our organization for now as
>> we required a secure connection.
>>
>> I will try again with 3.0 when I find time as we still need a solution.
>>
>> Artur Neumann, INF/N IT Projects
>> International Nepal Fellowship
>> Web: http://www.inf.org
>> Skype: artur.n.
>>
>> Am 24.02.2014 08:46, schrieb Sanjay Rao:
>> > Couldn't find a definitive answer to - is rtmps and/or https supported
>> > in 2.0 on a Mac client? There are too many conflicting answers to
>> > this. Appreciate if somebody can answer this question. I have followed
>> > published instructions and also done enough research on configuration
>> > but still can't get it to work.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Sanjay
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: RTMPS / HTTPS support in 2.0
Posted by Daniela Kirsch <dk...@excelsystems.com>.
We have tried it a lot too. And it did work on a Mac client. However it
wasn't stable, so we also dropped it for now and will try again with 3.0.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Artur Neumann [ICT Projects, INF/N] <
ict.projects@nepal.inf.org> wrote:
> I've tried RTMPS with 2.1 and 2.2 in Oct 2013 with no luck. Maxim helped
> a lot to investigate that problem. But we could not fix it so I, had to
> drop the project of running OpenMeetings in our organization for now as
> we required a secure connection.
>
> I will try again with 3.0 when I find time as we still need a solution.
>
> Artur Neumann, INF/N IT Projects
> International Nepal Fellowship
> Web: http://www.inf.org
> Skype: artur.n.
>
> Am 24.02.2014 08:46, schrieb Sanjay Rao:
> > Couldn't find a definitive answer to - is rtmps and/or https supported
> > in 2.0 on a Mac client? There are too many conflicting answers to
> > this. Appreciate if somebody can answer this question. I have followed
> > published instructions and also done enough research on configuration
> > but still can't get it to work.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sanjay
> >
>
>
Re: RTMPS / HTTPS support in 2.0
Posted by "Artur Neumann [ICT Projects, INF/N]" <ic...@nepal.inf.org>.
I've tried RTMPS with 2.1 and 2.2 in Oct 2013 with no luck. Maxim helped
a lot to investigate that problem. But we could not fix it so I, had to
drop the project of running OpenMeetings in our organization for now as
we required a secure connection.
I will try again with 3.0 when I find time as we still need a solution.
Artur Neumann, INF/N IT Projects
International Nepal Fellowship
Web: http://www.inf.org
Skype: artur.n.
Am 24.02.2014 08:46, schrieb Sanjay Rao:
> Couldn't find a definitive answer to - is rtmps and/or https supported
> in 2.0 on a Mac client? There are too many conflicting answers to
> this. Appreciate if somebody can answer this question. I have followed
> published instructions and also done enough research on configuration
> but still can't get it to work.
>
> Thanks
> Sanjay
>