You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com> on 2011/09/29 11:59:51 UTC
hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Hi,
the low-hanging fruits are hanging quite high ;-)
Thus, as given at [1], we can get file ksc5601.h from [2] under a Apache
permissive license.
Unfortunately, the provided file [3] does not contain a license or
copyright header. But a copyright file [4] exists at the same location
as ksc5601.h which contains the copyright and license not only for
ksc5601.h, but for all files at [2]
My proposal to go ahead is:
- copy the following contents of the copyright file [4] into the
downloaded ksc5601.h file
<contents from copyright file [4] to be copied into new ksc5601.h file>
Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
"Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM,
DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR
OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR
THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
</contents from copyright file to be copied into new ksc5601.h file>
- replace the current ksc5601.h be the one created by the first step.
- adjust dependencies of our source code on ksc5601.h accordingly, if
needed.
- add a corresponding statement in the NOTICE that parts of the source
code are on the copyright from Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Is this ok and conform to Apache regarding 3rd party licenses?
Best regards, Oliver.
[1]
http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration#A_header_from_GNU_c_library_.28solved.29
[2] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/#dirlist
[3]
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/ksc5601.h?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
[4]
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/COPYRIGHT?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni <gi...@tutopia.com> wrote:
> Hi Oliver;
>
> --- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Thanks for the input.
>>
>> Adding the URL for the origin of the copyright and license
>> text is a good idea. I will add it and use it also to point
>> to the origin of ksc5601.h.
>> As Pedro researched the files are also found at
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/tree/src/xlibi18n/lcUniConv
>> I will use this URL as the origin.
>>
>
> I suggest we take the original XFree86 file as this preserves
> better the origin information. At a later time we can update
> it to the X.Org version but XFree86 deserves some form of
> credit for convincing the FSF ;).
>
> (Just for curiosity I will compare the file we have with
> the new header to check if there may be any significant
> difference.)
>
Thanks. And btw, I like what Oliver did here. We should do more of
this. I'd recommend that for every 3rd party component that we're
investigating, that the person who is looking at it should start a new
thread on ooo-dev to discuss. The collective knowledge and experience
we have on the history of these components, and possible replacements,
is greater than any single one of us has.
> cheers,
>
> Pedro.
>
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org>.
Hi;
--- On Fri, 9/30/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
> Ok, I will reference the original URL [1] in the header
> file.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
> [1] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/#dirlist
>
I don't like adding URLs to the headers as those can change
or disappear. Just keeping the CVS string is enough: people
can google "XFree86 ksc5601.h" and find it. It can also be
mentioned in the commit.
In general when I do header IP clean up (yes, I've done
it before in FreeBSD audio drivers) I first copy the clean
header untouched, then get the code to build cleanly and
*then* I make local changes which are good to keep in VCS.
It's actually easy to do in SVN.. but I have some problems
in my setup and I can't build/test it yet.
Pedro.
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Pedro,
On 29.09.2011 18:29, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Oliver;
>
> --- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Thanks for the input.
>>
>> Adding the URL for the origin of the copyright and license
>> text is a good idea. I will add it and use it also to point
>> to the origin of ksc5601.h.
>> As Pedro researched the files are also found at
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/tree/src/xlibi18n/lcUniConv
>> I will use this URL as the origin.
>>
>
> I suggest we take the original XFree86 file as this preserves
> better the origin information. At a later time we can update
> it to the X.Org version but XFree86 deserves some form of
> credit for convincing the FSF ;).
>
Ok, I will reference the original URL [1] in the header file.
Best regards, Oliver.
[1] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/#dirlist
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by "Pedro F. Giffuni" <gi...@tutopia.com>.
Hi Oliver;
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
...
>
> Thanks for the input.
>
> Adding the URL for the origin of the copyright and license
> text is a good idea. I will add it and use it also to point
> to the origin of ksc5601.h.
> As Pedro researched the files are also found at
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/tree/src/xlibi18n/lcUniConv
> I will use this URL as the origin.
>
I suggest we take the original XFree86 file as this preserves
better the origin information. At a later time we can update
it to the X.Org version but XFree86 deserves some form of
credit for convincing the FSF ;).
(Just for curiosity I will compare the file we have with
the new header to check if there may be any significant
difference.)
cheers,
Pedro.
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>.
On 29.09.2011 15:15, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> <or...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the low-hanging fruits are hanging quite high ;-)
>>
>> Thus, as given at [1], we can get file ksc5601.h from [2] under a Apache
>> permissive license.
>> Unfortunately, the provided file [3] does not contain a license or copyright
>> header. But a copyright file [4] exists at the same location as ksc5601.h
>> which contains the copyright and license not only for ksc5601.h, but for all
>> files at [2]
>>
>
> OK. So [4] is a permissive license for all files in the directory.
> This may seen odd, coming from the FSF, but they encourage this is
> some cases, such as when the code is very small, or where the code
> promotes the use of an open standard that competes against a
> proprietary standard.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html
>
>
>> My proposal to go ahead is:
>> - copy the following contents of the copyright file [4] into the downloaded
>> ksc5601.h file
>> <contents from copyright file [4] to be copied into new ksc5601.h file>
>
> The Apache practice is documented here. Look under "Treatment of
> Third-Party Works".
>
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>
> One of the steps says, "Do ensure that every third-party work includes
> its associated license, even if that requires adding a copy of the
> license from the third-party download site into the distribution."
>
> It is not clear to me how we apply that step in this case:
>
> 1) Do we copy that license file into the same directory as ksc5601.h?
> But the license is written very poorly, "This notice applies to the
> files in this directory". We might have it in a directory that has
> other files that were not originally in the same directory. This
> seems like a bad idea.
>
> 2) Do we add the license to the specific files that we've copied?
> That is your proposal.
>
> 3) Or do we not touch the original file, but simple put the license
> text in our NOTICE.txt
>
> Maybe best is #2, but also put a comment in the source code where you
> document the provenance of the file, giving the facts you gave above:
> that the file is from this URL, that the license is in this other
> file, and the text of the license is as follows, etc.
>
Thanks for the input.
Adding the URL for the origin of the copyright and license text is a
good idea. I will add it and use it also to point to the origin of
ksc5601.h.
As Pedro researched the files are also found at
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/tree/src/xlibi18n/lcUniConv
I will use this URL as the origin.
Best regards, Oliver.
>
>> Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>
>> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
>> of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
>> deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
>> rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
>> sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
>> furnished to do so.
>>
>> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
>> IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
>> FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
>> FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
>> LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
>> FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
>> IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> </contents from copyright file to be copied into new ksc5601.h file>
>>
>> - replace the current ksc5601.h be the one created by the first step.
>>
>> - adjust dependencies of our source code on ksc5601.h accordingly, if
>> needed.
>>
>> - add a corresponding statement in the NOTICE that parts of the source code
>> are on the copyright from Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>
>> Is this ok and conform to Apache regarding 3rd party licenses?
>>
>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration#A_header_from_GNU_c_library_.28solved.29
>>
>> [2] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/#dirlist
>>
>> [3]
>> http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/ksc5601.h?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>>
>> [4]
>> http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/COPYRIGHT?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>>
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by "Pedro F. Giffuni" <gi...@tutopia.com>.
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
...
>
> OK. So [4] is a permissive license for all files in
> the directory.
> This may seen odd, coming from the FSF, but they encourage
> this is some cases, such as when the code is very small,
> or where the code promotes the use of an open standard
> that competes against a proprietary standard.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html
>
FWIW, What happened here is that the XFree86 guys
only uses code under MIT/BSD licenses, so they
contacted the FSF and got the permission from them.
The X.org guys forked from XFree86 and I see they removed
the XFree86 CVS tags. Normal practice is keep the tags,
for origin reference.
Pedro.
> > [4]
> > http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/COPYRIGHT?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
> >
>
>
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
<or...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the low-hanging fruits are hanging quite high ;-)
>
> Thus, as given at [1], we can get file ksc5601.h from [2] under a Apache
> permissive license.
> Unfortunately, the provided file [3] does not contain a license or copyright
> header. But a copyright file [4] exists at the same location as ksc5601.h
> which contains the copyright and license not only for ksc5601.h, but for all
> files at [2]
>
OK. So [4] is a permissive license for all files in the directory.
This may seen odd, coming from the FSF, but they encourage this is
some cases, such as when the code is very small, or where the code
promotes the use of an open standard that competes against a
proprietary standard.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html
> My proposal to go ahead is:
> - copy the following contents of the copyright file [4] into the downloaded
> ksc5601.h file
> <contents from copyright file [4] to be copied into new ksc5601.h file>
The Apache practice is documented here. Look under "Treatment of
Third-Party Works".
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
One of the steps says, "Do ensure that every third-party work includes
its associated license, even if that requires adding a copy of the
license from the third-party download site into the distribution."
It is not clear to me how we apply that step in this case:
1) Do we copy that license file into the same directory as ksc5601.h?
But the license is written very poorly, "This notice applies to the
files in this directory". We might have it in a directory that has
other files that were not originally in the same directory. This
seems like a bad idea.
2) Do we add the license to the specific files that we've copied?
That is your proposal.
3) Or do we not touch the original file, but simple put the license
text in our NOTICE.txt
Maybe best is #2, but also put a comment in the source code where you
document the provenance of the file, giving the facts you gave above:
that the file is from this URL, that the license is in this other
file, and the text of the license is as follows, etc.
-Rob
> Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
> of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
> deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
> rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
> furnished to do so.
>
> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
> FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
> IN THE SOFTWARE.
> </contents from copyright file to be copied into new ksc5601.h file>
>
> - replace the current ksc5601.h be the one created by the first step.
>
> - adjust dependencies of our source code on ksc5601.h accordingly, if
> needed.
>
> - add a corresponding statement in the NOTICE that parts of the source code
> are on the copyright from Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Is this ok and conform to Apache regarding 3rd party licenses?
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
>
> [1]
> http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration#A_header_from_GNU_c_library_.28solved.29
>
> [2] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/#dirlist
>
> [3]
> http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/ksc5601.h?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>
> [4]
> http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/COPYRIGHT?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Pedro,
thanks for the investigation.
What you are proposing are exactly the changes which I have made locally
to integrate the new header file and to prepare a corresponding patch.
Additionally, I deleted everything in the header file which is not used
in our source code. Thus, only the two records are left over. I also
changed the type of the record entries to <const hchar>.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 30.09.2011 06:04, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Oliver-Rainer;
>
> I looked at the files: the GPL'd file has
> only two records and the names don't match the
> ones in the XFree86 file.
>
> We shouldn't rename anything in the header, but
> change the sources instead. It's not difficult
> because both names appear only on hcode.cpp.
>
> cheers,
>
> Pedro.
>
> --- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann<or...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann<or...@googlemail.com>
>> Subject: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Thursday, September 29, 2011, 4:59 AM
>> Hi,
>>
>> the low-hanging fruits are hanging quite high ;-)
>>
>> Thus, as given at [1], we can get file ksc5601.h from [2]
>> under a Apache permissive license.
>> Unfortunately, the provided file [3] does not contain a
>> license or copyright header. But a copyright file [4] exists
>> at the same location as ksc5601.h which contains the
>> copyright and license not only for ksc5601.h, but for all
>> files at [2]
>>
>> My proposal to go ahead is:
>> - copy the following contents of the copyright file [4]
>> into the downloaded ksc5601.h file
>> <contents from copyright file [4] to be copied into new
>> ksc5601.h file>
>> Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Free Software Foundation,
>> Inc.
>>
>> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
>> obtaining a copy of this software and associated
>> documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the
>> Software without restriction, including without limitation
>> the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute,
>> sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
>> permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so.
>>
>> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY
>> KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE
>> WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>> PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FREE
>> SOFTWARE FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
>> OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR
>> OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE
>> SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> </contents from copyright file to be copied into new
>> ksc5601.h file>
>>
>> - replace the current ksc5601.h be the one created by the
>> first step.
>>
>> - adjust dependencies of our source code on ksc5601.h
>> accordingly, if needed.
>>
>> - add a corresponding statement in the NOTICE that parts of
>> the source code are on the copyright from Free Software
>> Foundation, Inc.
>>
>> Is this ok and conform to Apache regarding 3rd party
>> licenses?
>>
>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration#A_header_from_GNU_c_library_.28solved.29
>>
>> [2] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/#dirlist
>>
>> [3] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/ksc5601.h?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>>
>> [4] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/COPYRIGHT?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>>
>>
Re: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
Posted by Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org>.
Oliver-Rainer;
I looked at the files: the GPL'd file has
only two records and the names don't match the
ones in the XFree86 file.
We shouldn't rename anything in the header, but
change the sources instead. It's not difficult
because both names appear only on hcode.cpp.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>
> Subject: hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h - header from GNU c library
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, September 29, 2011, 4:59 AM
> Hi,
>
> the low-hanging fruits are hanging quite high ;-)
>
> Thus, as given at [1], we can get file ksc5601.h from [2]
> under a Apache permissive license.
> Unfortunately, the provided file [3] does not contain a
> license or copyright header. But a copyright file [4] exists
> at the same location as ksc5601.h which contains the
> copyright and license not only for ksc5601.h, but for all
> files at [2]
>
> My proposal to go ahead is:
> - copy the following contents of the copyright file [4]
> into the downloaded ksc5601.h file
> <contents from copyright file [4] to be copied into new
> ksc5601.h file>
> Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Free Software Foundation,
> Inc.
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> obtaining a copy of this software and associated
> documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the
> Software without restriction, including without limitation
> the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute,
> sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
> permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so.
>
> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY
> KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE
> WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FREE
> SOFTWARE FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
> OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR
> OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE
> SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> </contents from copyright file to be copied into new
> ksc5601.h file>
>
> - replace the current ksc5601.h be the one created by the
> first step.
>
> - adjust dependencies of our source code on ksc5601.h
> accordingly, if needed.
>
> - add a corresponding statement in the NOTICE that parts of
> the source code are on the copyright from Free Software
> Foundation, Inc.
>
> Is this ok and conform to Apache regarding 3rd party
> licenses?
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
>
> [1] http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration#A_header_from_GNU_c_library_.28solved.29
>
> [2] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/#dirlist
>
> [3] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/ksc5601.h?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>
> [4] http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/*checkout*/xc/lib/X11/lcUniConv/COPYRIGHT?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>
>