You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/07/14 22:14:48 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] HeartSaVioR opened a new pull request #25154: [SPARK-28247][SS][BRANCH-2.4] Fix flaky test "query without test harness" on ContinuousSuite

HeartSaVioR opened a new pull request #25154: [SPARK-28247][SS][BRANCH-2.4] Fix flaky test "query without test harness" on ContinuousSuite
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25154
 
 
   ## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   This patch fixes the flaky test "query without test harness" on ContinuousSuite, via adding some more gaps on waiting query to commit the epoch which writes output rows.
   
   The observation of this issue is below (injected some debug logs to get them):
   
   ```
   reader creation time                                   1562225320210
   epoch 1 launched                                       1562225320593 (+380ms from reader creation time)
   epoch 13 launched                                      1562225321702 (+1.5s from reader creation time)
   partition reader creation time                         1562225321715 (+1.5s from reader creation time)
   
   next read time for first next call                     1562225321210 (+1s from reader creation time)
   first next called in partition reader                  1562225321746 (immediately after creation of partition reader)
   wait finished in next called in partition reader       1562225321746 (no wait)
   
   second next called in partition reader                 1562225321747 (immediately after first next())
   
   epoch 0 commit started                                 1562225321861
   
   writing rows (0, 1) (belong to epoch 13)               1562225321866 (+100ms after first next())
   
   wait start in waitForRateSourceTriggers(2)             1562225322059
   
   next read time for second next call                    1562225322210 (+1s from previous "next read time")
   wait finished in next called in partition reader       1562225322211 (+450ms wait)
   
   writing rows (2, 3) (belong to epoch 13)               1562225322211 (immediately after next())
   
   epoch 14 launched                                      1562225322246
   
   desired wait time in waitForRateSourceTriggers(2)      1562225322510 (+2.3s from reader creation time)
   
   epoch 12 committed                                     1562225323034
   ```
   
   These rows were written within desired wait time, but the epoch 13 couldn't be committed within it. Interestingly, epoch 12 was lucky to be committed within a gap between finished waiting in waitForRateSourceTriggers and query.stop() - but even suppose the rows were written in epoch 12, it would be just in luck and epoch should be committed within desired wait time.
   
   This patch modifies Rate continuous stream to track the highest committed value, so that test can wait until desired value is reported to the stream as committed.
   
   This patch also modifies Rate continuous stream to track the timestamp at stream gets the first committed offset, and let `waitForRateSourceTriggers` use the timestamp. This also relies on waiting for specific period, but safer approach compared to current based on the observation above. Based on the change, this patch saves couple of seconds in test time.
   
   ## How was this patch tested?
   
   3 sequential test runs succeeded locally.
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org