divide and conquer bsp package

[Suraj Menon <me...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I would like to know the general opinion on the number of classes in
org.apache.hama.bsp package.
I feel it has too many classes and could be logically divided into more
entities like groom, master, job, task, io, etc. (possibly ft, checkpoint,
recovery to come soon :) )
I think we are already handling message part of it now.

Thanks,
Suraj

Re: divide and conquer bsp package

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

+1

나의 iPhone에서 보냄

2012. 2. 24. 오전 4:41 Suraj Menon <me...@gmail.com> 작성:

> Hi,
> 
> I would like to know the general opinion on the number of classes in
> org.apache.hama.bsp package.
> I feel it has too many classes and could be logically divided into more
> entities like groom, master, job, task, io, etc. (possibly ft, checkpoint,
> recovery to come soon :) )
> I think we are already handling message part of it now.
> 
> Thanks,
> Suraj

Re: divide and conquer bsp package

[Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>]

I'm +1 for it for more than a year now.
Hope the others share the same opinion.

2012/2/23 Suraj Menon <me...@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> I would like to know the general opinion on the number of classes in
> org.apache.hama.bsp package.
> I feel it has too many classes and could be logically divided into more
> entities like groom, master, job, task, io, etc. (possibly ft, checkpoint,
> recovery to come soon :) )
> I think we are already handling message part of it now.
>
> Thanks,
> Suraj
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin <th...@gmail.com>